Stakeholder perspectives on contributors to delayed and inaccurate diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and their implications for digital health technologies: a UK-based qualitative study.
Humans
Cardiovascular Diseases
/ diagnosis
United Kingdom
Qualitative Research
Female
Male
Focus Groups
Middle Aged
Adult
Delayed Diagnosis
/ prevention & control
Aged
Digital Technology
Physician-Patient Relations
Biomedical Technology
Interviews as Topic
Communication
Diagnostic Errors
/ prevention & control
Stakeholder Participation
Digital Health
cardiology
health services accessibility
patient satisfaction
patient-centered care
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 May 2024
20 May 2024
Historique:
medline:
22
5
2024
pubmed:
22
5
2024
entrez:
21
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to understand stakeholder experiences of diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) to support the development of technological solutions that meet current needs. Specifically, we aimed to identify challenges in the process of diagnosing CVD, to identify discrepancies between patient and clinician experiences of CVD diagnosis, and to identify the requirements of future health technology solutions intended to improve CVD diagnosis. Semistructured focus groups and one-to-one interviews to generate qualitative data that were subjected to thematic analysis. UK-based individuals (N=32) with lived experience of diagnosis of CVD (n=23) and clinicians with experience in diagnosing CVD (n=9). We identified four key themes related to delayed or inaccurate diagnosis of CVD: symptom interpretation, patient characteristics, patient-clinician interactions and systemic challenges. Subthemes from each are discussed in depth. Challenges related to time and communication were greatest for both stakeholder groups; however, there were differences in other areas, for example, patient experiences highlighted difficulties with the psychological aspects of diagnosis and interpreting ambiguous symptoms, while clinicians emphasised the role of individual patient differences and the lack of rapport in contributing to delays or inaccurate diagnosis. Our findings highlight key considerations when developing digital technologies that seek to improve the efficiency and accuracy of diagnosis of CVD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38772579
pii: bmjopen-2023-080445
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080445
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e080445Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.