How does communication affect patient safety? Protocol for a systematic review and logic model.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 5 2024
pubmed: 28 5 2024
entrez: 27 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

One in 10 patients are harmed in healthcare, more than three million deaths occur annually worldwide due to patient safety incidents, and the economic burden of patient safety incidents accounts for 15% of hospital expenditure. Poor communication between patients and practitioners is a significant contributor to patient safety incidents. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which patient safety is affected by communication and to provide a logic model that illustrates how communication impacts patient safety. We will conduct a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies, reported in any language, that quantify the effects of practitioner and patient communication on patient safety. We will search MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsychINfo, CENTRAL, Scopus and ProQuest theses and dissertations from 2013 to 7 February 2024. We will also hand-search references of included studies. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised studies, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2 (RoB2) for randomised controlled trials. If appropriate, results will be pooled with summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs); otherwise, we will conduct a narrative synthesis. We will organise our findings by healthcare discipline, type of communication and type of patient safety incident. We will produce a logic model to illustrate how communication impacts patient safety. This systematic review does not require formal ethics approval. Findings will be disseminated through international conferences, news and peer-reviewed journals. CRD42024507578.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38802275
pii: bmjopen-2024-085312
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085312
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e085312

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Jeremy Howick (J)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK jh815@leicester.ac.uk.
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Amber Bennett-Weston (A)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK.

Josie Solomon (J)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK.

Keith Nockels (K)

University Library, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Jennifer Bostock (J)

The Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics, London, UK.

Leila Keshtkar (L)

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, Leicester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH