Moral distress among physicians in Norway: a longitudinal study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 5 2024
pubmed: 28 5 2024
entrez: 28 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To explore and compare physicians' reported moral distress in 2004 and 2021 and identify factors that could be related to these responses. Longitudinal survey. Data were gathered from the Norwegian Physician Panel Study, a representative sample of Norwegian physicians, conducted in 2004 and 2021. 1499 physicians in 2004 and 2316 physicians in 2021. The same survey instrument was used to measure change in moral distress from 2004 to 2021. Logistic regression analyses examined the role of gender, age and place of work. Response rates were 67% (1004/1499) in 2004 and 71% (1639/2316) in 2021. That patient care is deprived due to time constraints is the most severe dimension of moral distress among physicians, and it has increased as 68.3% reported this 'somewhat' or 'very morally distressing' in 2004 compared with 75.1% in 2021. Moral distress also increased concerning that patients who 'cry the loudest' get better and faster treatment than others. Moral distress was reduced on statements about long waiting times, treatment not provided due to economic limitations, deprioritisation of older patients and acting against one's conscience. Women reported higher moral distress than men at both time points, and there were significant gender differences for six statements in 2021 and one in 2004. Age and workplace influenced reported moral distress, though not consistently for all statements. In 2004 and 2021 physicians' moral distress related to scarcity of time or unfair distribution of resources was high. Moral distress associated with resource scarcity and acting against one's conscience decreased, which might indicate improvements in the healthcare system. On the other hand, it might suggest that physicians have reduced their ideals or expectations or are morally fatigued.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38803245
pii: bmjopen-2023-080380
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080380
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e080380

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Ingrid Miljeteig (I)

Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway ingrid.miljeteig@uib.no.
Department for Research and Development, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.

Reidun Førde (R)

Center for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Norway.
Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway.

Karin Isaksson Rø (KI)

Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway.

Fredrik Bååthe (F)

Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Stress Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Berit Horn Bringedal (BH)

Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH