Social contact patterns during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: insights from a panel study, April to September 2020.
COVID-19
Contact matrices
Contact pattern
Control measures, CoMix
Physical distancing
Social distance
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2024
29 May 2024
Historique:
received:
15
12
2023
accepted:
14
05
2024
medline:
30
5
2024
pubmed:
30
5
2024
entrez:
29
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted social distance measures and lockdowns of varying strictness. Social contact patterns are essential in driving the spread of respiratory infections, and country-specific measurements are needed. This study aimed to gain insights into changes in social contacts and behaviour during the early pandemic phase in Norway. We conducted an online panel study among a nationally representative sample of Norwegian adults by age and gender. The panel study included six data collections waves between April and September 2020, and 2017 survey data from a random sample of the Norwegian population (including children < 18 years old) were used as baseline. The market research company Ipsos was responsible for carrying out the 2020 surveys. We calculated mean daily contacts, and estimated age-stratified contact matrices during the study period employing imputation of child-to-child contacts. We used the next-generation method to assess the relative reduction of R0 and compared the results to reproduction numbers estimated for Norway during the 2020 study period. Over the six waves in 2020, 5 938 observations/responses were registered from 1 718 individuals who reported data on 22 074 contacts. The mean daily number of contacts among adults varied between 3.2 (95%CI 3.0-3.4) to 3.9 (95%CI 3.6-4.2) across the data collection waves, representing a 67-73% decline compared to pre-pandemic levels (baseline). Fewer contacts in the community setting largely drove the reduction; the drop was most prominent among younger adults. Despite gradual easing of social distance measures during the survey period, the estimated population contact matrices remained relatively stable and displayed more inter-age group mixing than at baseline. Contacts within households and the community outside schools and workplaces contributed most to social encounters. Using the next-generation method R0 was found to be roughly 25% of pre-pandemic levels during the study period, suggesting controlled transmission. Social contacts declined significantly in the months following the March 2020 lockdown, aligning with implementation of stringent social distancing measures. These findings contribute valuable empirical information into the social behaviour in Norway during the early pandemic, which can be used to enhance policy-relevant models for addressing future crises when mitigation measures might be implemented.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries adopted social distance measures and lockdowns of varying strictness. Social contact patterns are essential in driving the spread of respiratory infections, and country-specific measurements are needed. This study aimed to gain insights into changes in social contacts and behaviour during the early pandemic phase in Norway.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted an online panel study among a nationally representative sample of Norwegian adults by age and gender. The panel study included six data collections waves between April and September 2020, and 2017 survey data from a random sample of the Norwegian population (including children < 18 years old) were used as baseline. The market research company Ipsos was responsible for carrying out the 2020 surveys. We calculated mean daily contacts, and estimated age-stratified contact matrices during the study period employing imputation of child-to-child contacts. We used the next-generation method to assess the relative reduction of R0 and compared the results to reproduction numbers estimated for Norway during the 2020 study period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Over the six waves in 2020, 5 938 observations/responses were registered from 1 718 individuals who reported data on 22 074 contacts. The mean daily number of contacts among adults varied between 3.2 (95%CI 3.0-3.4) to 3.9 (95%CI 3.6-4.2) across the data collection waves, representing a 67-73% decline compared to pre-pandemic levels (baseline). Fewer contacts in the community setting largely drove the reduction; the drop was most prominent among younger adults. Despite gradual easing of social distance measures during the survey period, the estimated population contact matrices remained relatively stable and displayed more inter-age group mixing than at baseline. Contacts within households and the community outside schools and workplaces contributed most to social encounters. Using the next-generation method R0 was found to be roughly 25% of pre-pandemic levels during the study period, suggesting controlled transmission.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Social contacts declined significantly in the months following the March 2020 lockdown, aligning with implementation of stringent social distancing measures. These findings contribute valuable empirical information into the social behaviour in Norway during the early pandemic, which can be used to enhance policy-relevant models for addressing future crises when mitigation measures might be implemented.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38811933
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18853-8
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-18853-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1438Subventions
Organisme : Norwegian Research Council
ID : PID 312721
Organisme : Norwegian Research Council
ID : PID 312721
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg. 2020;78:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
pubmed: 32305533
pmcid: 7162753
Control ECfDPa. Data on country response measures to COVID-19. 2022. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/download-data-response-measures-covid-19 . Accessed 5 Sept 2023.
Verelst F, Kuylen E, Beutels P. Indications for healthcare surge capacity in European countries facing an exponential increase in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases, March 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(13). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.13.2000323 .
Seppälä E, Tønnessen R, Veneti L, Paulsen TH, Steens A, Whittaker R, Bragstad K, Berild JD, Løvlie AL, Naseer U, MacDonald E, Vold L. COVID-19 cases reported to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health in the first six weeks of the epidemic. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020;140(18). https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.20.0525 . Print 2020 Dec 15.
Ursin G, Skjesol I, Tritter J. The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: the dominance of social implications in framing the policy response. Health Policy Technol. 2020;9(4):663–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004
pubmed: 32874857
pmcid: 7452841
(DSS) Ds-os. Tidslinje: myndighetenes håndtering av koronasituasjonen. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/Koronasituasjonen/tidslinje-koronaviruset/id2692402/ . Accessed 5 Sept 2023.
Johansen TB, Astrup E, Jore S, et al. Infection prevention guidelines and considerations for paediatric risk groups when reopening primary schools during COVID-19 pandemic, Norway, April 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(22). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2020.25.22.2000921 .
Winje BA, Ofitserova TS, Brynildsrud OB, et al. Comprehensive contact tracing, testing and sequencing show limited transmission of SARS-CoV-2 between children in schools in Norway, August 2020 to May 2021. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9122587 .
Health NIoP. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Norwegian population measured in residual sera collected in late summer 2020. 2020. https://www.fhi.no/en/publ/2020/Seroprevalence-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-Norwegian-population-measured-in-residual-sera-collected-in-late-summer-2020/ .
Holmdahl I, Buckee C. Wrong but useful - what covid-19 epidemiologic models can and cannot tell us. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(4):303–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2016822 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2016822
pubmed: 32412711
Delamater PL, Street EJ, Leslie TF, Yang YT, Jacobsen KH. Complexity of the basic reproduction number (R(0)). Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2501.171901 .
doi: 10.3201/eid2501.171901
pubmed: 30560777
pmcid: 6302597
Storvik G, Diz-Lois Palomares A, Engebretsen S, Rø G, Engø-Monsen K, Kristoffersen A, de Blasio BF, Frigessi A. A sequential Monte Carlo approach to estimate a time varying reproduction number in infectious disease models: the Covid-19 case. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society. 2023;2023:qnad043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssa/qnad043 .
doi: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnad043
Engebretsen S, Diz-Lois Palomares A, Rø G, et al. A real-time regional model for COVID-19: probabilistic situational awareness and forecasting. PLoS Comput Biol. 2023;19(1):e1010860.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010860
pubmed: 36689468
pmcid: 9894546
Wallinga J, Teunis P, Kretzschmar M. Using data on social contacts to estimate age-specific transmission parameters for respiratory-spread infectious agents. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(10):936–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj317 .
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj317
pubmed: 16968863
Mossong J, Hens N, Jit M, et al. Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 2008;5(3):e74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074
pubmed: 18366252
pmcid: 2270306
Hoang T, Coletti P, Melegaro A, et al. A systematic review of social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections. Epidemiology. 2019;30(5):723–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001047 .
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001047
pubmed: 31274572
pmcid: 6684224
Health NIoP. Social contact and vaccine coverage survey, Norway 2016. 2019. https://www.fhi.no/en/cristin-projects/concluded/social-contact-and-vaccine-coverage-survey-norway-2016/ . Accessed September 5, 2023.
Verelst F, Hermans L, Vercruysse S, et al. SOCRATES-CoMix: a platform for timely and open-source contact mixing data during and in between COVID-19 surges and interventions in over 20 European countries. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02133-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02133-y
pubmed: 34583683
pmcid: 8478607
Jarvis CI, Van Zandvoort K, Gimma A, et al. Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8
pubmed: 32375776
pmcid: 7202922
Steens A, Freiesleben de Blasio B, Veneti L, et al. Poor self-reported adherence to COVID-19-related quarantine/isolation requests, Norway, April to July 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(37). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.37.2001607 .
Aaro LE, Veneti L, Vedaa O, Smith ORF, De Blasio BF, Robberstad B. Visiting crowded places during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel study among adult norwegians. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1076090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1076090 .
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1076090
pubmed: 36589944
pmcid: 9797867
Statistics Norway. 2020. https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/nokkeltall/population . Accessed Jul 2020.
Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R, et al. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(4):529–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8 .
doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
pubmed: 33686204
Hens N, Ayele GM, Goeyvaerts N, et al. Estimating the impact of school closure on social mixing behaviour and the transmission of close contact infections in eight European countries. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:187. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-187 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-187
pubmed: 19943919
pmcid: 2799408
Klepac P, Kucharski AJ, Conlan AJ, et al. Contacts in context: large-scale setting-specific social mixing matrices from the BBC pandemic project. medRxiv. 2020:2020.02.16.20023754. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.16.20023754 .
Brankston G, Merkley E, Fisman DN, et al. Quantifying contact patterns in response to COVID-19 public health measures in Canada. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):2040. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12080-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12080-1
pubmed: 34749676
pmcid: 8574152
Coletti P, Wambua J, Gimma A, et al. CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):21885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78540-7 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78540-7
pubmed: 33318521
pmcid: 7736856
Norwegian Institute of Public Health C-mt. Situational awareness and forecasting for Norway, Week 19, May 11 2023. https://www.fhi.no/contentassets/e6b5660fc35740c8bb2a32bfe0cc45d1/vedlegg/nasjonale-og-regionale-rapporter/2023_05_11national_regional_model.pdf . Accessed 5 Sept 2023.
Farrington CP, Whitaker HJ, Wallinga J, Manfredi P. Measures of disassortativeness and their application to directly transmitted infections. Biom J. 2009;51(3):387–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200800160 .
doi: 10.1002/bimj.200800160
pubmed: 19492337
Gimma A, Munday JD, Wong KLM, et al. Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: a repeated cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(3):e1003907.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003907
pubmed: 35231023
pmcid: 8887739
Zhang J, Litvinova M, Liang Y, et al. Changes in contact patterns shape the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Science. 2020;368(6498):1481–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8001 .
doi: 10.1126/science.abb8001
pubmed: 32350060
pmcid: 7199529
Backer JA, Mollema L, Vos ER, et al. Impact of physical distancing measures against COVID-19 on contacts and mixing patterns: repeated cross-sectional surveys, the Netherlands, 2016-17, April 2020 and June 2020. Euro Surveill. 2021;26(8). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.Es.2021.26.8.2000994 .
Latsuzbaia A, Herold M, Bertemes JP, Mossong J. Evolving social contact patterns during the COVID-19 crisis in Luxembourg. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237128.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237128
pubmed: 32760114
pmcid: 7410209
Feehan DM, Mahmud AS. Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):893. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2 .
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2
pubmed: 33563992
pmcid: 7873309
Dahlen OP, Skirbekk H. How trust was maintained in Scandinavia through the first crisis of modernity. Corp Commun. 2021;26(1):23–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/Ccij-01-2020-0036 .
doi: 10.1108/Ccij-01-2020-0036
Anda EE, Braaten T, Borch KB, et al. Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the adult population during the pre-vaccination period, Norway, winter 2020/21. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(13). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.13.2100376 .
Willem L, Van Hoang T, Funk S, Coletti P, Beutels P, Hens N. SOCRATES: an online tool leveraging a social contact data sharing initiative to assess mitigation strategies for COVID-19. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-05136-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05136-9
pubmed: 32546245
pmcid: 7296890
Wong KLM, Gimma A, Coletti P, et al. Social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic in 21 European countries – evidence from a two-year study. BMC Infect Dis. 2023;23(1):268. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08214-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08214-y
pubmed: 37101123
pmcid: 10132446
Kamineni M, Engo-Monsen K, Midtbo JE, et al. Effects of non-compulsory and mandatory COVID-19 interventions on travel distance and time away from home, Norway, 2021. Euro Surveill. 2023;28(17). https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.17.2200382 .