Implications of pulse wave velocity and central pulse pressure in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.


Journal

Blood pressure
ISSN: 1651-1999
Titre abrégé: Blood Press
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9301454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2024
Historique:
medline: 31 5 2024
pubmed: 31 5 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and central pulse pressure (PP) are recognised as significant indicators of vascular health and predictors of cardiovascular outcomes. In this study, associations between central hemodynamics and left ventricular (LV) echocardiographic parameters were investigated in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), comparing the results to healthy individuals. This cross-sectional prospective controlled study included 50 subjects with HFrEF [mean LV ejection fraction (EF) 26 ± 6.5%] and 30 healthy controls (mean LVEF 65.9 ± 5.3%). Pulse wave analysis (PWA) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were used to measure central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness. The HFrEF group displayed higher cfPWV (8.2 vs. 7.2 m/s, Significant associations between central hemodynamic measures and LV echocardiographic parameters were identified, suggesting the potential to use PWA and cfPWV as possible tools for managing HFrEF. What is the context?Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) affects millions of people worldwide.Vascular health plays a significant role in the development and progression of HFrEF.This study investigates two indicators of arterial stiffness—pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central pulse pressure (PP)—and their impact on the functioning of the heart in HFrEF patients compared to healthy individuals.What is new?The study found that higher carotid-femoral PWV and central PP, which typically indicate worse vascular health, were associated with better heart function in HFrEF patients. This paradoxical finding suggests that in the context of HFrEF, traditional markers of vascular health may have different implications.The study included non-invasive methods to evaluate these indicators, offering a potential new additional approach for monitoring and managing HFrEF.What is the impact?We could possibly use non-invasively evaluated PWV and central PP (measures of vascular function) as markers of left ventricular function assessment in HFrEF.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and central pulse pressure (PP) are recognised as significant indicators of vascular health and predictors of cardiovascular outcomes. In this study, associations between central hemodynamics and left ventricular (LV) echocardiographic parameters were investigated in subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), comparing the results to healthy individuals.
METHODS AND RESULTS UNASSIGNED
This cross-sectional prospective controlled study included 50 subjects with HFrEF [mean LV ejection fraction (EF) 26 ± 6.5%] and 30 healthy controls (mean LVEF 65.9 ± 5.3%). Pulse wave analysis (PWA) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were used to measure central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness. The HFrEF group displayed higher cfPWV (8.2 vs. 7.2 m/s,
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
Significant associations between central hemodynamic measures and LV echocardiographic parameters were identified, suggesting the potential to use PWA and cfPWV as possible tools for managing HFrEF.
What is the context?Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) affects millions of people worldwide.Vascular health plays a significant role in the development and progression of HFrEF.This study investigates two indicators of arterial stiffness—pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central pulse pressure (PP)—and their impact on the functioning of the heart in HFrEF patients compared to healthy individuals.What is new?The study found that higher carotid-femoral PWV and central PP, which typically indicate worse vascular health, were associated with better heart function in HFrEF patients. This paradoxical finding suggests that in the context of HFrEF, traditional markers of vascular health may have different implications.The study included non-invasive methods to evaluate these indicators, offering a potential new additional approach for monitoring and managing HFrEF.What is the impact?We could possibly use non-invasively evaluated PWV and central PP (measures of vascular function) as markers of left ventricular function assessment in HFrEF.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
What is the context?Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) affects millions of people worldwide.Vascular health plays a significant role in the development and progression of HFrEF.This study investigates two indicators of arterial stiffness—pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central pulse pressure (PP)—and their impact on the functioning of the heart in HFrEF patients compared to healthy individuals.What is new?The study found that higher carotid-femoral PWV and central PP, which typically indicate worse vascular health, were associated with better heart function in HFrEF patients. This paradoxical finding suggests that in the context of HFrEF, traditional markers of vascular health may have different implications.The study included non-invasive methods to evaluate these indicators, offering a potential new additional approach for monitoring and managing HFrEF.What is the impact?We could possibly use non-invasively evaluated PWV and central PP (measures of vascular function) as markers of left ventricular function assessment in HFrEF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38819846
doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2359932
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2359932

Auteurs

Anette Caroline Kõre (AC)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Tuuli Joonsalu (T)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital, Heart Clinic, Tartu, Estonia.

Martin Serg (M)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
North Estonia Medical Centre, Centre of Cardiology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Priit Pauklin (P)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital, Heart Clinic, Tartu, Estonia.

Jüri Voitk (J)

North Estonia Medical Centre, Centre of Cardiology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Indrek Roose (I)

Tartu University Hospital, Heart Clinic, Tartu, Estonia.

Jaan Eha (J)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital, Heart Clinic, Tartu, Estonia.

Priit Kampus (P)

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
North Estonia Medical Centre, Centre of Cardiology, Tallinn, Estonia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH