SURVIVAL RATE OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SINGLE-TOOTH RESTORATIONS BASED ON ZIRCONIA OR METAL ABUTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TOOTH AGENESIS: A 5-YEARS PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY.
Dental abutments
Dental crowns
Dental implant
Single-Tooth
Survival rate
Zirconium dioxide
Journal
The journal of evidence-based dental practice
ISSN: 1532-3390
Titre abrégé: J Evid Based Dent Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101083101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
13
10
2023
revised:
22
12
2023
accepted:
13
01
2024
medline:
1
6
2024
pubmed:
1
6
2024
entrez:
31
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary aim was to investigate survival rate of zirconia versus metal abutments, and the secondary aim was clinical outcomes of all-ceramic versus metal-ceramic crowns on single-tooth implants. Patients with tooth-agenesis participated to previously published prospective clinical study with 3-year follow-up were recalled after 5 years. Biological variables included survival and success rate of implants, marginal bone level, modified Plaque and Sulcus Bleeding Index and biological complications. Technical variables included restoration survival rate, marginal adaptation and technical complications. The aesthetic outcome of crowns and peri-implant mucosa in addition to patient-reported outcome were recorded. Descriptive analysis, linear mixed model for quantitative data, or generalized linear mixed model for ordinal categorical data were applied; significance was set to 0.05. Fifty-three patients (mean age: 32.4 years), with 89 implants participated to the 5-years examination. The implants supported 50 zirconia abutments with 50 all-ceramic (AC) crown and 39 metal abutments with 29 metal-ceramic (MC) and 10 AC crowns. The Implant and restoration survival rate was 100% and 96%, respectively. No clinically relevant biological difference between implants supporting metal or zirconia abutments was registered. The technical complications were veneering fracture of AC-crowns (n = 3), crown loosening of MC-crowns (n = 4) and one abutment screw loosening (MC-crown on metal abutment). MC-crowns had significantly better marginal adaptation than AC-crowns (p = .01). AC-crowns had significantly better color and morphology than MC-crowns (p = .01). Zirconia-based single-tooth restorations are reliable alternative materials to metal-based restorations with favorable biological and aesthetic outcome, and few technical complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38821661
pii: S1532-3382(24)00002-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101970
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Metal Ceramic Alloys
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Clinical Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101970Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.