SURVIVAL RATE OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SINGLE-TOOTH RESTORATIONS BASED ON ZIRCONIA OR METAL ABUTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TOOTH AGENESIS: A 5-YEARS PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY.


Journal

The journal of evidence-based dental practice
ISSN: 1532-3390
Titre abrégé: J Evid Based Dent Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101083101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 13 10 2023
revised: 22 12 2023
accepted: 13 01 2024
medline: 1 6 2024
pubmed: 1 6 2024
entrez: 31 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The primary aim was to investigate survival rate of zirconia versus metal abutments, and the secondary aim was clinical outcomes of all-ceramic versus metal-ceramic crowns on single-tooth implants. Patients with tooth-agenesis participated to previously published prospective clinical study with 3-year follow-up were recalled after 5 years. Biological variables included survival and success rate of implants, marginal bone level, modified Plaque and Sulcus Bleeding Index and biological complications. Technical variables included restoration survival rate, marginal adaptation and technical complications. The aesthetic outcome of crowns and peri-implant mucosa in addition to patient-reported outcome were recorded. Descriptive analysis, linear mixed model for quantitative data, or generalized linear mixed model for ordinal categorical data were applied; significance was set to 0.05. Fifty-three patients (mean age: 32.4 years), with 89 implants participated to the 5-years examination. The implants supported 50 zirconia abutments with 50 all-ceramic (AC) crown and 39 metal abutments with 29 metal-ceramic (MC) and 10 AC crowns. The Implant and restoration survival rate was 100% and 96%, respectively. No clinically relevant biological difference between implants supporting metal or zirconia abutments was registered. The technical complications were veneering fracture of AC-crowns (n = 3), crown loosening of MC-crowns (n = 4) and one abutment screw loosening (MC-crown on metal abutment). MC-crowns had significantly better marginal adaptation than AC-crowns (p = .01). AC-crowns had significantly better color and morphology than MC-crowns (p = .01). Zirconia-based single-tooth restorations are reliable alternative materials to metal-based restorations with favorable biological and aesthetic outcome, and few technical complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38821661
pii: S1532-3382(24)00002-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101970
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Zirconium C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide S38N85C5G0
Metal Ceramic Alloys 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Clinical Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101970

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mandana Hosseini (M)

Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N-2200, Denmark. Electronic address: manho@sund.ku.dk.

Nils Worsaae (N)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Klaus Gotfredsen (K)

Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N-2200, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH