Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 30 03 2024
accepted: 20 05 2024
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 5 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the established gold standard treatment for benign gallbladder diseases. However, robotic cholecystectomy is still controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in LC and robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) in patients with nonmalignant gallbladder conditions. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing RAC to LC in patients with benign gallbladder disease. Only randomized trials and non-randomized studies with propensity score matching were included. Mean differences (MDs) were computed for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with I

Identifiants

pubmed: 38837047
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01989-5
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-01989-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

242

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Coccolini F, Catena F, Pisano M, Gheza F, Fagiuoli S, Di Saverio S et al (2015) Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 18:196–204
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083 pubmed: 25958296
Arca MJ, Adams RB, Angelos P, Fanelli RD, Mammen JMV, Nelson MT et al (2021) American board of surgery statement on assessment and robotic surgery. Am J Surg 221(2):424–426
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.039 pubmed: 33097190
Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911 pubmed: 31922557 pmcid: 6991252
Marino MV, Mirabella A, Guarrasi D, Lupo M, Komorowski AL (2019) Robotic-assisted repair of iatrogenic common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Int J Med Robot 15(3):e1992
doi: 10.1002/rcs.1992 pubmed: 30773791
Magge D, Steve J, Novak S, Slivka A, Hogg M, Zureikat A et al (2017) Performing the difficult cholecystectomy using combined endoscopic and robotic techniques: how I do it. J Gastrointest Surg 21(3):583–589
doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3323-8 pubmed: 27896657
Staderini F, Foppa C, Minuzzo A, Badii B, Qirici E, Trallori G et al (2016) Robotic rectal surgery: state of the art. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8(11):757–771
doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i11.757 pubmed: 27895814 pmcid: 5108978
Singh A, Kaur M, Swaminathan C, Siby J, Singh KK, Sajid MS (2014) Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis to differentiate between postoperative outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:3
doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-56
Han C, Shan X, Yao L, Yan P, Li M, Hu L et al (2018) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 32(11):4377–4392
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6295-9 pubmed: 29956028
Kalata S, Thumma JR, Norton EC, Dimick JB, Sheetz KH (2023) Comparative safety of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA Surg 158(12):1303–1310
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4389 pubmed: 37728932 pmcid: 10512167
Ghanem M, Shaheen S, Blebea J, Tuma F, Zayout M, Conti N et al (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case-control outcome analysis and surgical resident training implications. Cureus 12(4):e7641
pubmed: 32399373 pmcid: 7216311
Lee SJ, Moon JI, Choi IS (2023) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy is better in reducing postoperative pain than single-incision and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 37(5):3548–3556
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09846-y pubmed: 36604338
Grochola LF, Soll C, Zehnder A, Wyss R, Herzog P, Breitenstein S (2019) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy: results of a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 33(5):1482–1490
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6430-7 pubmed: 30218263
Jang EJ, Kang SH, Kim KW (2023) Propensity score matched comparison of robotic single-site and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 27(4):e2023.00043
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00043 pubmed: 38045820 pmcid: 10690481
Kane WJ, Charles EJ, Mehaffey JH, Hawkins RB, Meneses KB, Tache-Leon CA et al (2020) Robotic compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a propensity matched analysis. Surgery 167(2):432–435
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.020 pubmed: 31492434
Samalavicius NE, Kaminskas T, Zidonis Z, Janusonis V, Deduchovas O, Eismontas V et al (2022) Robotic cholecystectomy using Senhance robotic platform versus laparoscopic conventional cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis. Acta Chir Belg 122(3):160–163
doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1881332 pubmed: 33502944
Campbell S, Lee SH, Liu Y, Wren SM (2023) A retrospective study of laparoscopic, robotic-assisted, and open emergent/urgent cholecystectomy based on the PINC AI Healthcare Database 2017–2020. World J Emerg Surg 18:55
doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00521-8 pubmed: 38037087 pmcid: 10687827
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 pubmed: 33782057 pmcid: 8005924
U.S. National Institute of Health Research. PROSPERO. International prospective register of systematic reviews. n.d. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024510865
Francis NK, Curtis NJ, Conti JA, Foster JD, Bonjer HJ, Hanna GB et al (2018) EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 32(9):3822–3829
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1 pubmed: 29435754
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 15273542 pmcid: 1360123
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898 pubmed: 31462531
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919
doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919 pubmed: 27733354 pmcid: 5062054
Page M, Sterne JAC, Higgins JPT. Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. Wiley-Blackwell; 2019 [cited 2024 Feb 23]. p. 349–74. Available from: https://research.monash.edu/en/publications/assessing-risk-of-bias-due-to-missing-results-in-a-synthesis
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634
doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 pubmed: 9310563 pmcid: 2127453
Gjerdevik M, Heuch I (2014) Improving the error rates of the Begg and Mazumdar test for publication bias in fixed effects meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 14(1):109
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-109 pubmed: 25245217 pmcid: 4193136
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560
doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pubmed: 12958120 pmcid: 192859
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pubmed: 3802833
Kudsi OY, Castellanos A, Kaza S, McCarty J, Dickens E, Martin D et al (2017) Cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life after da Vinci Single-Site cholecystectomy and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: short-term results from a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 31(8):3242–3250
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5353-4 pubmed: 27864724
Pietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Vinci A, Peri A, Tinozzi FP, Cavazzi E et al (2016) Short-term outcomes of single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Surg Endosc 30(7):3089–3097
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4601-3 pubmed: 26497946
Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y et al (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5(1):115–118
pubmed: 16481296
Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA (2008) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247(6):987–993
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f pubmed: 18520226
Hagen ME, Balaphas A, Podetta M, Rohner P, Jung MK, Buchs NC et al (2018) Robotic single-site versus multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-matched analysis of short- and long-term costs. Surg Endosc 32(3):1550–1555
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5843-z pubmed: 29052069
Han DH, Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2020) Propensity score-matching analysis for single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 78:138–142
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.042 pubmed: 32334076
Abd El Aziz MA, Grass F, Behm KT, Shawki S, D’Angelo AL, Mathis KL et al (2021) Trends of complications and innovative technique’s utilization for colectomies in the United States. Updates Surg 73(1):101–110
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00862-y pubmed: 32772277
Sinha R, Jain V, Sp S, Saha SC, Sunkavalli C, Kiran L et al (2023) Multi-institutional trends in gynecological robotic surgery in india: a real-world scenario. Cureus 15(3):e36564
pubmed: 37095794 pmcid: 10122180
Lunardi N, Abou-Zamzam A, Florecki KL, Chidambaram S, Shih IF, Kent AJ et al (2024) Robotic technology in emergency general surgery cases in the era of minimally invasive surgery. JAMA Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016 pubmed: 38446451
Aggarwal R, Winter Beatty J, Kinross J, von Roon A, Darzi A, Purkayastha S (2020) Initial experience with a new robotic surgical system for cholecystectomy. Surg Innov 27(2):136–142
doi: 10.1177/1553350619890736 pubmed: 31771424

Auteurs

Lucas Monteiro Delgado (LM)

Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190-Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil. ldelgado@ufmg.br.

Bernardo Fontel Pompeu (BF)

Department of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (USCS), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Eric Pasqualotto (E)

Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

Caio Mendonça Magalhães (CM)

Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190-Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil.

Ana Flávia Machado Oliveira (AFM)

Department of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Bárbara Klyslie Kato (BK)

Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (USCS), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Luis Fernando Paes Leme (LFP)

Department of General Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul (USCS), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo (SMP)

Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH