New Supplemental Benefits and Plan Ratings Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 5 6 2024
pubmed: 5 6 2024
entrez: 5 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In 2018, the US Congress gave Medicare Advantage (MA) historic flexibility to address members' social needs with a set of Special Supplemental Benefits for the Chronically Ill (SSBCIs). In response, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services expanded the definition of primarily health-related benefits (PHRBs) to include nonmedical services in 2019. Uptake has been modest; MA plans cited a lack of evidence as a limiting factor. To evaluate the association between adopting the expanded supplemental benefits designed to address MA enrollees' nonmedical and social needs and enrollees' plan ratings. This cohort study compared the plan ratings of MA enrollees in plans that adopted an expanded PHRB, SSBCI, or both using difference-in-differences estimators with MA Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems survey data from March to June 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 linked to Medicare administrative claims and publicly available benefits and enrollment data. Data analysis was performed between April 2023 and March 2024. Enrollees in MA plans that adopted a PHRB and/or SSBCI in 2021. Enrollee plan rating on a 0- to 10-point scale, with 0 indicating the worst health plan possible and 10 indicating the best health plan possible. The study sample included 388 356 responses representing 467 MA contracts and 2558 plans in 2021. Within the weighted population of responders, the mean (SD) age was 74.6 (8.7) years, 57.2% were female, 8.9% were fully Medicare-Medicaid dual eligible, 74.6% had at least 1 chronic medical condition, 13.7% had not graduated high school, 9.7% were helped by a proxy, 45.1% reported fair or poor physical health, and 15.6% were entitled to Medicare due to disability. Adopting both a new PHRB and SSBCI benefit in 2021 was associated with an increase of 0.22 out of 10 points (95% CI, 0.4-4.0 points) in mean enrollee plan ratings. There was no association between adoption of only a PHRB (adjusted difference, -0.12 points; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.02 points) or SSBCI (adjusted difference, 0.09 points; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.21 points) and plan rating. Medicare Advantage plans that adopted both benefits saw modest increases in mean enrollee plan ratings. This evidence suggests that more investments in supplemental benefits were associated with improved plan experiences, which could contribute to improved plan quality ratings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38837157
pii: 2819557
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15058
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2415058

Auteurs

Emma L Tucher (EL)

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

David J Meyers (DJ)

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

Amal N Trivedi (AN)

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.

Laura M Gottlieb (LM)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Kali S Thomas (KS)

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Center for Equity in Aging, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH