Codesign and refinement of an optimised antenatal education session to better inform women and prepare them for labour and birth.


Journal

BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 23 12 2023
accepted: 19 05 2024
medline: 11 6 2024
pubmed: 11 6 2024
entrez: 10 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Our objective was to codesign, implement, evaluate acceptability and refine an optimised antenatal education session to improve birth preparedness. There were four distinct phases: codesign (focus groups and codesign workshops with parents and staff); implementation of intervention; evaluation (interviews, questionnaires, structured feedback forms) and systematic refinement. The study was set in a single maternity unit with approximately 5500 births annually. Postnatal and antenatal women/birthing people and birth partners were invited to participate in the intervention, and midwives were invited to deliver it. Both groups participated in feedback. We report on whether the optimised session is deliverable, acceptable, meets the needs of women/birthing people and partners, and explain how the intervention was refined with input from parents, clinicians and researchers. The codesign was undertaken by 35 women, partners and clinicians. Five midwives were trained and delivered 19 antenatal education (ACE) sessions to 142 women and 94 partners. 121 women and 33 birth partners completed the feedback questionnaire. Women/birthing people (79%) and birth partners (82%) felt more prepared after the class with most participants finding the content very helpful or helpful. Women/birthing people perceived classes were more useful and engaging than their partners. Interviews with 21 parents, a midwife focus group and a structured feedback form resulted in 38 recommended changes: 22 by parents, 5 by midwives and 11 by both. Suggested changes have been incorporated in the training resources to achieve an optimised intervention. Engaging stakeholders (women and staff) in codesigning an evidence-informed curriculum resulted in an antenatal class designed to improve preparedness for birth, including assisted birth, that is acceptable to women and their birthing partners, and has been refined to address feedback and is deliverable within National Health Service resource constraints. A nationally mandated antenatal education curriculum is needed to ensure parents receive high-quality antenatal education that targets birth preparedness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38858078
pii: bmjoq-2023-002731
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002731
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Abi Merriel (A)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK abi.merriel@liverpool.ac.uk.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Miriam Toolan (M)

Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Mary Lynch (M)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Gemma Clayton (G)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Andrew Demetri (A)

Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Lucy Willis (L)

University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Narendra Mampitiya (N)

University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Alice Clarke (A)

North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.

Katherine Birchenall (K)

Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Chloe de Souza (C)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Emma Harvey (E)

University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Tamarind Russell-Webster (T)

University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Eva Larkai (E)

University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Mariusz Grzeda (M)

King's College London, London, UK.

Kate Rawling (K)

Parent Representative, Bristol, UK.

Sonia Barnfield (S)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Margaret Smith (M)

Department of Women's and Children's Health, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.

Rachel Plachcinski (R)

NCT User Representative, London, UK.

Christy Burden (C)

Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Abigail Fraser (A)

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Michael Larkin (M)

Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Anna Davies (A)

Academic Women's Health Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH