Assessing the perioperative gain of weight (Δweight) as a determinant of morbidity after kidney transplantation: a retrospective exploratory study.
Biomarkers
Complications
Outcomes
Prediction
Transplant
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
26
03
2024
accepted:
03
06
2024
medline:
12
6
2024
pubmed:
12
6
2024
entrez:
11
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with a substantial risk of postoperative complications (POC) for which performant predictors are lacking. Data showed that a perioperative gain of weight (ΔWeight) was associated with higher risk of POC, but it remains unexplored in KT. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between ΔWeight and POC after KT. ΔWeight was calculated on postoperative day (POD) 2. POC were graded according to the Dindo-Clavien classification. Primary endpoint was overall POC. A total of 242 patients were included and 174 (71.9%) complications were reported. Patients showed a rapid gain of weight after KT. Mean ΔWeight was 7.83 kg (± 3.20) compared to 5.3 kg (± 3.56) in patients with and without complication, respectively (p = 0.0005). ΔWeight showed an accuracy of 0.74 for overall POC. A cut-off of 8.5 kg was determined. ΔWeight ≥ 8.5 kg was identified as an independent predictor of overall POC on multivariable analysis (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.08-3.84; p = 0.025). ΔWeight ≥ 8.5 kg appeared as an independent predictor of POC after KT. These results stress the need to monitor weight in KT and to further investigate this surrogate with future studies assessing its clinical relevance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38862590
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63950-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-63950-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13384Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Wolfe, R. A. et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1725–1730. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199912023412303 (1999).
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412303
pubmed: 10580071
Hashimoto, Y. et al. Surgical complications in kidney transplantation: experience from 1200 transplants performed over 20 years at six hospitals in central Japan. Transplant. Proc. 28, 1465–1467 (1996).
pubmed: 8658743
Eufrasio, P. et al. Surgical complications in 2000 renal transplants. Transplant. Proc. 43, 142–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.009 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.009
pubmed: 21335172
Schreiber, P. W. et al. Surgical site infections after kidney transplantation are independently associated with graft loss. Am. J. Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2023.11.013 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.11.013
pubmed: 38042413
Foucher, Y. et al. A clinical scoring system highly predictive of long-term kidney graft survival. Kidney Int. 78, 1288–1294. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.232 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.232
pubmed: 20861817
Chapal, M. et al. A useful scoring system for the prediction and management of delayed graft function following kidney transplantation from cadaveric donors. Kidney Int. 86, 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2014.188 (2014).
doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.188
pubmed: 24897036
Rao, P. S. et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 88, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b (2009).
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b
pubmed: 19623019
Joliat, G. R. et al. Postoperative decrease of albumin (DeltaAlb) as early predictor of complications after gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Perioper. Med. (Lond) 11, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-022-00238-3 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00238-3
pubmed: 35164873
Labgaa, I. et al. Impact of postoperative weight gain on complications after liver surgery. HPB (Oxford) 22, 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.015 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.015
pubmed: 31676254
Grass, F. et al. Stringent fluid management might help to prevent postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 404, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1744-4 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1744-4
pubmed: 30607532
Pache, B. et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis to determine optimal fluid management during open colorectal surgery. Colorectal. Dis. 21, 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14465 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/codi.14465
pubmed: 30407708
Labgaa, I., Demartines, N. & Hubner, M. Biomarkers capable to early predict postoperative complications: the grail. Ann. Surg. 266, e91–e92. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001771 (2017).
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001771
pubmed: 27391859
Labgaa, I., Demartines, N. & Hubner, M. Serum albumin: a promising biomarker to anticipate postoperative complications. Dis. Colon Rectum 60, e616. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000848 (2017).
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000848
pubmed: 28796740
Mantziari, S. et al. A novel approach to major surgery: tracking its pathophysiologic footprints. World J. Surg. 39, 2641–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3181-7 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3181-7
pubmed: 26243563
Hubner, M. et al. Postoperative albumin drop is a marker for surgical stress and a predictor for clinical outcome: a pilot study. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2016, 8743187. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8743187 (2016).
doi: 10.1155/2016/8743187
pubmed: 26880899
pmcid: 4736779
Slankamenac, K., Graf, R., Barkun, J., Puhan, M. A. & Clavien, P. A. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann. Surg. 258, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732 (2013).
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732
pubmed: 23728278
Gonvers, S. et al. Biological impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme in liver surgery. BJS Open 5(2), zraa015. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa015 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa015
pubmed: 33688943
Labgaa, I. et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery has a positive impact on non-ERAS liver surgery patients. World J. Surg. 40, 1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3363-3 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3363-3
pubmed: 26666423
Boom, H., Mallat, M. J., de Fijter, J. W., Zwinderman, A. H. & Paul, L. C. Delayed graft function influences renal function, but not survival. Kidney Int. 58, 859–866. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00235.x (2000).
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00235.x
pubmed: 10916111
Rodrigo, E. et al. Creatinine reduction ratio on post-transplant day two as criterion in defining delayed graft function. Am. J. Transplant. 4, 1163–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00488.x (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00488.x
pubmed: 15196076
Nagaraja, P. et al. Influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on outcomes after kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death. Transplantation 94, 1218–1223. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3182708e30 (2012).
doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182708e30
pubmed: 23154212
Yates, F. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ
doi: 10.2307/2983604