Piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis during pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis.


Journal

BJS open
ISSN: 2474-9842
Titre abrégé: BJS Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101722685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 May 2024
Historique:
received: 15 02 2024
revised: 28 03 2024
accepted: 02 05 2024
medline: 13 6 2024
pubmed: 13 6 2024
entrez: 13 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with an increased incidence of surgical-site infections, often leading to a significant rise in morbidity and mortality. This trend underlines the inadequacy of traditional antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. Hence, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of antimicrobial prophylaxis, comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with traditional antibiotics. Upon registering in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023479100), a systematic search of various databases was conducted over the interval 2000-2023. This inclusive search encompassed a wide range of study types, including prospective and retrospective cohorts and RCTs. The subsequent data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.4. A total of eight studies involving 2382 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and received either piperacillin/tazobactam (1196 patients) or traditional antibiotics (1186 patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group had significantly reduced incidences of surgical-site infections (OR 0.43 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.62); P < 0.00001) and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) (OR 0.61 (95% c.i. 0.45 to 0.81); P = 0.0008). Subgroup analysis of surgical-site infections highlighted significantly reduced incidences of superficial surgical-site infections (OR 0.34 (95% c.i. 0.14 to 0.84); P = 0.02) and organ/space surgical-site infections (OR 0.47 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.78); P = 0.004) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Further, the analysis demonstrated significantly lower incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C) (OR 0.67 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 0.83); P = 0.0003) and mortality (OR 0.51 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.91); P = 0.02) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Piperacillin/tazobactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of postoperative surgical-site infections, major surgical complications (complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C), and mortality, hence supporting the implementation of piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis in current practice.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with an increased incidence of surgical-site infections, often leading to a significant rise in morbidity and mortality. This trend underlines the inadequacy of traditional antibiotic prophylaxis strategies. Hence, the aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the outcomes of antimicrobial prophylaxis, comparing piperacillin/tazobactam with traditional antibiotics.
METHODS METHODS
Upon registering in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42023479100), a systematic search of various databases was conducted over the interval 2000-2023. This inclusive search encompassed a wide range of study types, including prospective and retrospective cohorts and RCTs. The subsequent data analysis was carried out utilizing RevMan 5.4.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of eight studies involving 2382 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and received either piperacillin/tazobactam (1196 patients) or traditional antibiotics (1186 patients) as antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery were included in the meta-analysis. Patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group had significantly reduced incidences of surgical-site infections (OR 0.43 (95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.62); P < 0.00001) and major surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III) (OR 0.61 (95% c.i. 0.45 to 0.81); P = 0.0008). Subgroup analysis of surgical-site infections highlighted significantly reduced incidences of superficial surgical-site infections (OR 0.34 (95% c.i. 0.14 to 0.84); P = 0.02) and organ/space surgical-site infections (OR 0.47 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.78); P = 0.004) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group. Further, the analysis demonstrated significantly lower incidences of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C) (OR 0.67 (95% c.i. 0.53 to 0.83); P = 0.0003) and mortality (OR 0.51 (95% c.i. 0.28 to 0.91); P = 0.02) in the piperacillin/tazobactam group.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Piperacillin/tazobactam as antimicrobial prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of postoperative surgical-site infections, major surgical complications (complications classified as Clavien-Dindo grade greater than or equal to III), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (grades B and C), and mortality, hence supporting the implementation of piperacillin/tazobactam for surgical prophylaxis in current practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38869238
pii: 7692283
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae066
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination 157044-21-8
Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Piperacillin X00B0D5O0E

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.

Auteurs

Jayant Kumar (J)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.

Isabella Reccia (I)

General Surgery and Oncologic Unit, Policlinico ponte San Pietro, Bergamo, Italy.

Adriano Carneiro (A)

Department of Surgery, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Mauro Podda (M)

Department of Surgery, Calgiari University Hospital, Calgiari, Italy.

Francesco Virdis (F)

Dipartimento DEA-EAS, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Milano, Milano, Italy.

Nikolaos Machairas (N)

Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

David Nasralla (D)

Department of HPB Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Ramesh P Arasaradnam (RP)

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Institute of Precision Diagnostics & Translational Medicine, Coventry, UK.

Kenneth Poon (K)

Division of Infectious Disease, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.

Christopher J Gannon (CJ)

Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.

John J Fung (JJ)

Department of Surgery, The Transplantation Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Nagy Habib (N)

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Omar Llaguna (O)

Department of General Surgery, Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, Florida, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH