Effect of surface treatment strategies on bond strength of additively and subtractively manufactured hybrid materials for permanent crowns.
3D printing
Additive manufacturing
Shear bond strength
Surface energy
Surface roughness
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
03
12
2023
accepted:
05
06
2024
medline:
13
6
2024
pubmed:
13
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the bond strength of different computer-aided design / computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) hybrid ceramic materials following different pretreatments. A total of 306 CAD/CAM hybrid material specimens were manufactured, n = 102 for each material (VarseoSmile Crown Material type (p = 0.001), pretreatment strategy (p < 0.001), and the interaction (p < 0.001) all had significant effects on Ra value. However, only etching on VSCP and VE surface increased SFE value significantly. Regarding SBS value, no significant difference was found among the three materials (p = 0.937), while the pretreatment strategy significantly influenced SBS (p < 0.05). Etching on VSCP specimens showed the lowest mean value among all groups, while sandblasting and silane result in higher SBS for all test materials. The bond strength of CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic materials for milling and 3D-printing was comparable. Sandblasting and silane coupling were suitable for both millable and printable materials, while hydrofluoric etching should not be recommended for CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic materials. Since comparable evidence between 3D-printable and millable CAD/CAM dental hybrid materials is scarce, the present study gives clear guidance for pretreatment planning on different materials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38869697
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3
pii: 10.1007/s00784-024-05767-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
VITA Enamic
0
Silanes
0
Dental Materials
0
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
371Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Mayer J, Stawarczyk B, Vogt K, Hickel R, Edelhoff D, Reymus M (2021) Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material. Clin Oral Investig 25(10):5987–5996
doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03905-9
pubmed: 33811531
Prause E, Hey J, Beuer F, Schmidt F (2022) Wear resistance of 3D-printed materials: a systematic review. Dentistry Rev 2(2):100051
doi: 10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100051
van Noort R (2012) The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28(1):3–12
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
pubmed: 22119539
Donmez MB, Çakmak G, Yılmaz D, Schimmel M, Abou-Ayash S, Yilmaz B, Peutzfeldt A (2023) Bond strength of additively manufactured composite resins to dentin and titanium when bonded with dual-polymerizing resin cements. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Awada A, Nathanson D (2015) Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 114(4):587–593
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
pubmed: 26141648
Mangoush E, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S (2021) Shear-bond strength and optical properties of short fiber-reinforced CAD/CAM composite blocks. Eur J Oral Sci 129(5):e12815
doi: 10.1111/eos.12815
pubmed: 34322917
Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent 35(12):897–902
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.002
pubmed: 17977638
Skorulska A, Piszko P, Rybak Z, Szymonowicz M, Dobrzyński M (2021) Review on Polymer, Ceramic and Composite Materials for CAD/CAM Indirect Restorations in Dentistry-Application, Mechanical Characteristics and Comparison, Materials (Basel) 14(7)
Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C (2014) Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 112(5):1141–1150
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
pubmed: 24980740
Silva EA, Simionato AA, Faria ACL, Bonfante EA, Rodrigues RCS, Ribeiro RF (2023) Mechanical properties, wear resistance, and reliability of two CAD-CAM Resin Matrix ceramics. Med (Kaunas) 59(1)
Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Pereira GKR, Segala RD, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF (2019) Fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic materials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Dent Mater 35(4):534–542
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.013
pubmed: 30686711
Grzebieluch W, Kowalewski P, Grygier D, Rutkowska-Gorczyca M, Kozakiewicz M, Jurczyszyn K (2021) Printable and Machinable Dental Restorative Composites for CAD/CAM Application-Comparison of Mechanical Properties, Fractographic, Texture and Fractal Dimension Analysis, Materials (Basel) 14(17)
Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Güth JF (2015) Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 55:1–11
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004
pubmed: 26519658
Suksuphan P, Krajangta N, Didron PP, Wasanapiarnpong T, Rakmanee T (2023) Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses. J Prosthodont Res
Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2016) Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res 60(4):265–273
doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003
pubmed: 26973053
Lise DP, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Vieira L, Baratieri LN, Van Meerbeek B (2017) Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Cement to Novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of Surface Treatment and Aging. Oper Dent 42(1):73–81
doi: 10.2341/15-263-L
pubmed: 27689770
Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB (2014) Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 26(6):382–393
doi: 10.1111/jerd.12100
pubmed: 24754327
Strasser T, Preis V, Behr M, Rosentritt M (2018) Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment. Clin Oral Investig 22(8):2787–2797
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6
pubmed: 29404810
Barutcigil K, Barutcigil Ç, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US (2019) Effect of different surface treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont 28(1):71–78
doi: 10.1111/jopr.12574
pubmed: 27880028
Luthra R, Kaur P (2016) An insight into current concepts and techniques in resin bonding to high strength ceramics. Aust Dent J 61(2):163–173
doi: 10.1111/adj.12365
pubmed: 26268746
Ozcan M, Bernasconi M (2015) Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 17(1):7–26
pubmed: 25646166
Burke FJ, Hussain A, Nolan L, Fleming GJ (2008) Methods used in dentine bonding tests: an analysis of 102 investigations on bond strength. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 16(4):158–165
pubmed: 19177726
Sudsangiam S, van Noort R (1999) Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1(1):57–67
pubmed: 11725686
Chuenjit P, Suzuki M, Shinkai K (2021) Effect of various surface treatments on the bond strength of resin luting agent and the surface roughness and surface energy of CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 40(1):16–25
doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-359
pubmed: 32779607
Porto TS, Medeiros da Silva IG, de Freitas Vallerini B, Fernando de M Goes (2022) Different surface treatment strategies on etchable CAD-CAM materials: part 1-Effect on the surface morphology. J Prosthet Dent
Prause E, Malgaj T, Kocjan A, Beuer F, Hey J, Jevnikar P, Schmidt F (2024) Mechanical properties of 3D-printed and milled composite resins for definitive restorations: an in vitro comparison of initial strength and fatigue behavior. J Esthet Restor Dent 36(2):391–401
doi: 10.1111/jerd.13132
pubmed: 37680013
Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of Surface Free Energy of Polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13(8):1741–
doi: 10.1002/app.1969.070130815
Dentistry—Polymer-Based Crown and Veneering Materials International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; No. DIN EN ISO 10477:2018; p. 19
Günal-Abduljalil B, Önöral Ö, Ongun S (2021) Micro-shear bond strengths of resin-matrix ceramics subjected to different surface conditioning strategies with or without coupling agent application. J Adv Prosthodont 13(3):180–190
doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.3.180
pubmed: 34234928
pmcid: 8250191
Graf T, Erdelt KJ, Güth JF, Edelhoff D, Schubert O, Schweiger J (2022) Influence of Pre-Treatment and Artificial Aging on the Retention of 3D-Printed Permane nt Composite Crowns, Biomedicines 10(9)
Park JH, Choi YS (2016) Microtensile bond strength and micromorphologic analysis of surface-treated resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 8(4):275–284
doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.275
pubmed: 27555896
pmcid: 4993840
Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC (2018) CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res 97(10):1082–1091
doi: 10.1177/0022034518779759
pubmed: 29906206
Elsaka SE (2016) Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 104(1):68–76
doi: 10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8
pubmed: 25585677
Kilinc H, Sanal FA, Turgut S (2020) Shear bond strengths of aged and non-aged CAD/CAM materials after different surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont 12(5):273–282
doi: 10.4047/jap.2020.12.5.273
pubmed: 33149848
pmcid: 7604239
Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Monteiro S, Júnior (2004) Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 13(1):28–35
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04007.x
pubmed: 15032893
Ozcan M, Vallittu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19(8):725–731
doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00019-8
pubmed: 14511730
Chen CL, Chi CW, Lee CY, Tsai YL, Kasimayan U, K POM, Lin HP, Chiang YC (2024) Effects of surface treatments of bioactive tricalcium silicate-based restorative material on the bond strength to resin composite. Dent Mater 40(1):102–110
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.027
pubmed: 37919112
Mehl C, Ali S, El Bahra S, Harder S, Vollrath O, Kern M (2016) Is there a correlation between Tensile Strength and Retrievability of cemented Implant-retained crowns using Artificial Aging? Int J Prosthodont 29(1):83–90
doi: 10.11607/ijp.4317
pubmed: 26757337
Pitta J, Bijelic-Donova J, Burkhardt F, Fehmer V, Narhi T, Sailer I (2020) Temporary Implant-supported single crowns using Titanium Base abutments: an in Vitro Study on Bonding Stability and pull-out forces. Int J Prosthodont 33(5):546–552
doi: 10.11607/ijp.6778
pubmed: 32956436
Rues S, Fugina M, Rammelsberg P, Kappel S (2017) Cemented single Crown Retention on Dental implants: an in Vitro Study. Int J Prosthodont 30(2):133–135
doi: 10.11607/ijp.4994
pubmed: 28267819