Paradoxical gender effects in meat consumption across cultures.
Culture
Equality
Gender
Meat consumption
Paradoxical gender effect
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 06 2024
13 06 2024
Historique:
received:
09
10
2023
accepted:
17
05
2024
medline:
14
6
2024
pubmed:
14
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Men tend to eat more meat than women, but it is not clear why. We tested three hypotheses in a cross-cultural design (20,802 individuals in 23 countries across four continents): that gender differences are (a) universal, (b) related to gender roles and thus weaker in countries with higher gender equality and human development, or (c) related to opportunities to express gender roles and thus stronger in countries with higher gender equality and human development. Across all countries, men tended to consume more meat than women. However, this difference increased significantly in countries with greater human development and gender equality. The paradoxical gender gap in meat consumption aligns with previous research that suggests greater differences in behavior across genders in contexts that are more developed and gender equal. We discuss implications for theories of culture and gender as well as practical implications for global meat reduction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38871837
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62511-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-62511-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13033Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Espinosa, R., Tago, D. & Treich, N. Infectious diseases and meat production. Environ. Res. Econ. 76(4), 1019–1044 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00484-3
Godfray, H. C. J. et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 361(6399), 5324 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324
Jones, R. C. Animal rights is a social justice issue. Cont. Just Rev. 18(4), 467–482 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/10282580.2015.1093689
Levy, B. S. & Patz, J. A. Climate change, human rights, and social justice. Annal. Glob. Health 81(3), 310–322 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.008
Walker, P., Rhubart-Berg, P., McKenzie, S., Kelling, K. & Lawrence, R. S. Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Pub. Health Nutrit. 8(4), 348–356 (2005).
doi: 10.1079/PHN2005727
Allès, B. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics between self-reported vegetarians, vegans, and meat-eaters from the NutriNet-Santé study. Nutrients 9(9), 1023 (2017).
doi: 10.3390/nu9091023
pubmed: 28926931
pmcid: 5622783
Clonan, A., Roberts, K. E. & Holdsworth, M. Socioeconomic and demographic drivers of red and processed meat consumption: Implications for health and environmental sustainability. Proceed. Nutrit. Soc. 75(3), 367–373 (2016).
doi: 10.1017/S0029665116000100
Daniel, C. R., Cross, A. J., Koebnick, C. & Sinha, R. Trends in meat consumption in the USA. Pub. Health Nutrit. 14(4), 575–583 (2011).
doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002077
Rosenfeld, D. L. & Tomiyama, A. J. Gender differences in meat consumption and openness to vegetarianism. Appetite 166, 105475 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105475
pubmed: 34166748
Archer, J. The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Bio. Rev. 94(4), 1381–1415 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/brv.12507
Fessler, D. T. Reproductive immunosuppression and diet: An evolutionary perspective on pregnancy sickness and meat consumption. Curr. Anthropol. 43(1), 19–61 (2002).
doi: 10.1086/324128
pubmed: 14992226
Love, H. J. & Sulikowski, D. Of meat and men: Sex differences in implicit and explicit attitudes toward meat. Front. Psychol. 9, 559 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00559
pubmed: 29731733
pmcid: 5920154
Pawlowski, B., Atwal, R. & Dunbar, R. I. Sex differences in everyday risk-taking behavior in humans. Evol. Psychol. 6(1), 147470490800600100 (2008).
doi: 10.1177/147470490800600104
Bonjour, J. P. Dietary protein: An essential nutrient for bone health. J. Am. Coll. Nutrit. 24(sup6), 526S-536S (2005).
doi: 10.1080/07315724.2005.10719501
Hunt, J., Breuker, C. J., Sadowski, J. A. & Moore, A. J. Male–male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: Determining total sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22(1), 13–26 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01633.x
pubmed: 19120810
Chiles, R. M. & Fitzgerald, A. J. Why is meat so important in Western history and culture? A genealogical critique of biophysical and political-economic explanations. Agr. Hum. Val. 35, 1–17 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s10460-017-9787-7
De Backer, C. et al. Meat and masculinities. Can differences in masculinity predict meat consumption, intentions to reduce meat and attitudes towards vegetarians?. Appetite 147, 104559 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104559
pubmed: 31852627
Rothgerber, H. Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychol. Men Masc. 14(4), 363–375 (2013).
doi: 10.1037/a0030379
Salmen, A. & Dhont, K. Animalizing women and feminizing (vegan) men: The psychological intersections of sexism, speciesism, meat, and masculinity. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Comp. 17(2), e12717 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/spc3.12717
Schösler, H., de Boer, J., Boersema, J. J. & Aiking, H. Meat and masculinity among young Chinese, Turkish and Dutch adults in the Netherlands. Appetite 89, 152–159 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.013
pubmed: 25681291
Costa, P. T. Jr., Terracciano, A. & McCrae, R. R. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(2), 322 (2001).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
pubmed: 11519935
Schmitt, D. P. et al. Personality and gender differences in global perspective. Int. J. Psychol. 52, 45–56 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/ijop.12265
pubmed: 27000535
Lippa, R. A. Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why?. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Comp. 4(11), 1098–1110 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00320.x
Bleidorn, W. et al. Age and gender differences in self-esteem—A cross-cultural window. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111(3), 396–410 (2016).
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000078
pubmed: 26692356
Falk, A. & Hermle, J. Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science 362(6412), eaas9899 (2018).
doi: 10.1126/science.aas9899
pubmed: 30337384
Schroeder, T. C., Barkley, A. P. & Schroeder, K. C. Income growth and international meat consumption. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 7(3), 15–30 (1996).
doi: 10.1300/J047v07n03_02
Milford, A. B., Le Mouël, C., Bodirsky, B. L. & Rolinski, S. Drivers of meat consumption. Appetite 141, 104313 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.06.005
pubmed: 31195058
Clark, R. A., Haytko, D. L., Hermans, C. M. & Simmers, C. S. Social influence on green consumerism: Country and gender comparisons between China and the United States. J. of Int. Cons. Mark. 31(3), 177–190 (2019).
doi: 10.1080/08961530.2018.1527740
Lenhausen, M. R., Hopwood, C. J. & Bleidorn, W. Nature and impact of reference group effects in personality assessment data. J. Pers. Assess. 105(5), 581–589 (2023).
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2132504
pubmed: 36260508
Guimond, S. et al. Culture, gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 1118–1134 (2007).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1118
pubmed: 17547492
Rosenfeld, D. L. Masculinity and men’s resistance to meat reduction. Psychol. Human-Animal Intergroup Relations 2, 1–11 (2023).
doi: 10.5964/phair.9645
United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. (Author, 2020).
Klugman, J. Sustainability and Equity: A better future for all. Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All. (UNDP-HDRO Human Development Reports, 2011).
World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report 2021. (Authors, 2021).
Rubio, N. R., Xiang, N. & Kaplan, D. L. Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 6276 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20061-y
pubmed: 33293564
pmcid: 7722853
Stoll-Kleemann, S. & Schmidt, U. J. Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: A review of influence factors. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1261–1277 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5
Di Marco, M. et al. Sustainable development must account for pandemic risk. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117(8), 3888–3892 (2020).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001655117
pubmed: 32060123
pmcid: 7049118
Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems 15(3), 401–415 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
Pais, D. F., Marques, A. C. & Fuinhas, J. A. Reducing meat consumption to mitigate climate change and promote health: But is it good for the economy?. Environ. Model. Assess. 25, 793–807 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s10666-020-09710-0
Whitton, C., Bogueva, D., Marinova, D. & Phillips, C. J. Are we approaching peak meat consumption? Analysis of meat consumption from 2000 to 2019 in 35 countries and its relationship to gross domestic product. Animals 11(12), 3466 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/ani11123466
pubmed: 34944243
pmcid: 8697883
Ye, T. & Mattila, A. S. The effect of ad appeals and message framing on consumer responses to plant-based menu items. Int. J. Hospitality Manag. 95, 102917 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102917