The effects of a tier 2 reading comprehension intervention aligned to tier 1 instruction for fourth graders with inattention and reading difficulties.


Journal

Journal of school psychology
ISSN: 1873-3506
Titre abrégé: J Sch Psychol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0050303

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 16 06 2023
revised: 17 12 2023
accepted: 23 04 2024
medline: 15 6 2024
pubmed: 15 6 2024
entrez: 14 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study reports a secondary analysis from a quasi-experimental design study (N = 13 schools) to examine the effects of aligned Tier 1 (T1) and Tier 2 (T2) instruction for a subsample of fourth graders with inattention and reading difficulties. Of this sample (N = 63 students), 100% received free- or reduced-price lunch, 92% identified as Hispanic, and 22% received special education services. T1 instruction focused on implementing practices to support reading comprehension and content learning during social studies instruction. The aligned T2 intervention focused on remediating reading comprehension difficulties using the same evidence-based practices implemented in T1, thus supporting students with connecting learning and applying skills across settings. Schools were assigned to one of three conditions: (a) aligned T1-T2 instruction; (b) nonaligned T1-T2 instruction, in which T1 and T2 practices were not intentionally aligned; or (c) business-as-usual (BaU) T1 and T2 practices. No significant differences were detected between the nonaligned T1-T2 and BaU conditions on student outcomes. However, large, statistically significant effects were detected in favor of the aligned T1-T2 condition compared to BaU on measures of content knowledge (Unit 1 ES = 0.85; Unit 2 ES = 1.46; Unit 3 ES = 0.79), vocabulary (Unit 1 ES = 0.88; Unit 2 ES = 0.85), and content reading comprehension (ES = 0.79). The aligned T1-T2 condition also outperformed the nonaligned T1-T2 condition on content knowledge (Unit 2 ES = 1.35; Unit 3 ES = 0.56), vocabulary (Unit 1 ES = 0.82), and the content reading comprehension assessment (ES = 0.69). Various effect sizes were not different from zero after correcting for clustered data. Although the magnitude of the effect sizes suggested promise, additional research is needed to fully understand the effects of aligned instruction on the reading outcomes of students with inattention and reading difficulty.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38876549
pii: S0022-4405(24)00040-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101320
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101320

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Elizabeth A Stevens (EA)

Department of Special Education, University of Kansas, United States. Electronic address: lizstevens@ku.edu.

Alicia Stewart (A)

Department of Reading and Elementary Education, University of North Carolina Charlotte, United States.

Sharon Vaughn (S)

Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, United States.

Young Ri Lee (YR)

Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, The University of Chicago, United States.

Nancy Scammacca (N)

Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, United States.

Elizabeth Swanson (E)

Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH