Elevated atmospheric CO
Climate change
Global change
Plant-pollinator interactions
Pollen nutrition
Pollen protein
Pollinator nutrition
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jun 2024
14 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
14
02
2024
accepted:
04
06
2024
medline:
15
6
2024
pubmed:
15
6
2024
entrez:
14
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (eCO
Identifiants
pubmed: 38877021
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63967-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-63967-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Dioxide
142M471B3J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13760Subventions
Organisme : USDA NIFA Postdoctoral Fellowship
ID : # 2021-67034-35229
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Crutzen, P. J. The “Anthropocene.” In Earth System Science in the Anthropocene (eds Ehlers, E. & Krafft, T.) (Springer, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3 .
doi: 10.1007/3-540-26590-2_3
Pritchard, S. G., Rogers, H. H., Prior, S. A. & Peterson, C. M. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x
Woodward, F. I. Potential impacts of global elevated CO
pubmed: 11960737
doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00253-4
Bhargava, S. & Mitra, S. Elevated atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12871
AbdElgawad, H., Zinta, G., Beemster, G. T. S., Janssens, I. A. & Asard, H. Future climate CO
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00556
pubmed: 27379102
pmcid: 4909749
Dong, J., Gruda, N., Lam, S. K., Li, X. & Duan, Z. Effects of elevated CO
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00924
Jablonski, L. M., Wang, X. & Curtis, P. S. Plant reproduction under elevated CO
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00494.x
Crowley, L. M., Sadler, J. P., Pritchard, J. & Hayward, S. A. L. Elevated CO
pubmed: 34206033
pmcid: 8227562
doi: 10.3390/insects12060512
Peñuelas, J. & Estiarte, M. Can elevated CO
pubmed: 21238180
doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01235-4
Cotrufo, M. F., Ineson, P. & Scott, A. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00101.x
Taub, D. R., Miller, B. & Allen, H. Effects of elevated CO
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01511.x
Loladze, I. Hidden shift of the ionome of plants exposed to elevated CO
doi: 10.7554/eLife.02245
pubmed: 24867639
pmcid: 4034684
Rogers, A., Ainsworth, E. A. & Leakey, A. D. B. Will elevated carbon dioxide concentration amplify the benefits of nitrogen fixation in legumes?. Plant Physiol. 151, 1009–1016 (2009).
pubmed: 19755541
pmcid: 2773101
doi: 10.1104/pp.109.144113
Davis, A. R. Influence of elevated CO
doi: 10.1007/s00606-002-0267-0
Rusterholz, H. P. & Erhardt, A. Effects of elevated CO
pubmed: 28307818
doi: 10.1007/s004420050385
Lake, J. C. & Hughes, L. Nectar production and floral characteristics of Tropaeolum majus L. grown in ambient and elevated carbon dioxide. Ann. Bot. 84, 535–541 (1999).
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1999.0949
Ziska, L. H. et al. Rising atmospheric CO
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0414
Silva, M., Ribeiro, H., Abreu, I., Cruz, A. & Esteves da Silva, J. C. G. Effects of CO
pubmed: 25471717
doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3896-2
Di Pasquale, G. et al. Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: Do pollen quality and diversity matter?. PLoS ONE 8, e72016 (2013).
pubmed: 23940803
pmcid: 3733843
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072016
Frias, B. E. D., Barbosa, C. D. & Lourenço, A. P. Pollen nutrition in honey bees (Apis mellifera): Impact on adult health. Apidologie 47, 15–25 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s13592-015-0373-y
Roger, N., Michez, D., Wattiez, R., Sheridan, C. & Vanderplanck, M. Diet effects on bumblebee health. J. Insect Physiol. 96, 128–133 (2017).
pubmed: 27836801
doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.11.002
Jones, J. & Rader, R. Pollinator nutrition and its role in merging the dual objectives of pollinator health and optimal crop production. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0170 (2022).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0170
Decker, L. E. et al. Elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO
pubmed: 33241571
doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13395
Stevenson, P. C. For antagonists and mutualists: The paradox of insect toxic secondary metabolites in nectar and pollen. Phytochem. Rev. 19, 603–614 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s11101-019-09642-y
Cook, S. M., Awmack, C. S., Murray, D. A. & Williams, I. H. Are honey bees’ foraging preferences affected by pollen amino acid composition?. Ecol. Entomol. 28, 622–627 (2003).
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00548.x
Kriesell, L., Hilpert, A. & Leonhardt, S. D. Different but the same: Bumblebee species collect pollen of different plant sources but similar amino acid profiles. Apidologie 48, 102–116 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s13592-016-0454-6
Rauer, D. et al. Ragweed plants grown under elevated CO
pubmed: 33037672
doi: 10.1111/all.14618
El Kelish, A. et al. Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) pollen allergenicity: SuperSAGE transcriptomic analysis upon elevated CO
pubmed: 24972689
pmcid: 4084800
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-176
Samanta, A., Das, G. & Das, S. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 6, 12–35 (2011).
Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO
pubmed: 15720649
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x
Pereyda-González, J. M. et al. High temperature and elevated CO
doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081836
Forrest, J. R. K. Plant–pollinator interactions and phenological change: What can we learn about climate impacts from experiments and observations?. Oikos 124, 4–13 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/oik.01386
Keller, I., Fluri, P. & Imdorf, A. Pollen nutrition and colony development in honey bees: Part 1. Bee World 86, 3–10 (2005).
doi: 10.1080/0005772X.2005.11099641
Qaderi, M. M., Martel, A. B. & Strugnell, C. A. Environmental factors regulate plant secondary metabolites. Plants 12, 447 (2023).
pubmed: 36771531
pmcid: 9920071
doi: 10.3390/plants12030447
Collins, M. et al. Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessement Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Shpak, Y. V., Leheta, U. V. & Sosnovskyi, K. S. Importance of pollinator diversity for sunflower seed production. Agrology 6, 79–85 (2023).
doi: 10.32819/021113
Larson, J. L., Kesheimer, A. J. & Potter, D. A. Pollinator assemblages on dandelions and white clover in urban and suburban lawns. J. Insect Conserv. 18, 863–873 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9694-9
Muñoz, A. A. & Cavieres, L. A. Sharing of pollinators between the invasive Taraxacum officinale and co-flowering natives is not related to floral similarity in the high-andes. Flora 261, 151491 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2019.151491
Gorenflo, A., Diekötter, T., Kleunen, M. van, Wolters, V. & Jauker, F. Contrasting pollination efficiency and effectiveness among flower visitors of Malva sylvestris, Borago officinalis and Onobrychis viciifolia. J. Pollinat. Ecol. 21, 62-70 (2017).
Stawiarz, E., Wróblewska, A., Masierowska, M. & Sadowska, D. Flowering, forage value, and insect pollination in borage (Borago officinalis L.) cultivated in SE Poland. J. Apic. Sci. 64, 77–89 (2020).
Williams, I. H. & Christian, D. G. Observations on Phacelia tanacetifolia Bentham (Hydrophyllaceae) as a food plant for honey bees and bumble bees. J. Apic. Res. 30, 3–12 (1991).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.1991.11101227
Giovanetti, M., Malabusini, S., Zugno, M. & Lupi, D. Influence of flowering characteristics, local environment, and daily temperature on the visits paid by Apis mellifera to the exotic crop Phacelia tanacetifolia. Sustainability 14, 10186 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/su141610186
Hogg, B. N., Bugg, R. L. & Daane, K. M. Attractiveness of common insectary and harvestable floral resources to beneficial insects. Biol. Control 56, 76–84 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.09.007
Bosch, J., Retana, J. & Cerdá, X. Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109, 583–591 (1997).
pubmed: 28307343
doi: 10.1007/s004420050120
Simao, M.-C.M., Matthijs, J. & Perfecto, I. Experimental small-scale flower patches increase species density but not abundance of small urban bees. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 1759–1768 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13085
Rodrigo Gómez, S., Ornosa, C., Selfa, J., Guara, M. & Polidori, C. Small sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) as potential major pollinators of melon (Cucumis melo) in the mediterranean. Entomol. Sci. 19, 55–66 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/ens.12168
Tschoeke, P. H., Oliveira, E. E., Dalcin, M. S., Silveira-Tschoeke, M. C. A. C. & Santos, G. R. Diversity and flower-visiting rates of bee species as potential pollinators of melon (Cucumis meloL.) in the Brazilian cerrado. Sci. Hortic. 186, 207–216 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.027
Roldán-Serrano, A. S. & Guerra-Sanz, J. M. Reward attractions of zucchini flowers (Cucurbita pepo L.) to bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.). Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 70, 23–28 (2005).
Rundlöf, M., Lundin, O. & Bommarco, R. Annual flower strips support pollinators and potentially enhance red clover seed yield. Ecol. Evol. 8, 7974–7985 (2018).
pubmed: 30250677
pmcid: 6144972
doi: 10.1002/ece3.4330
Palmer-Jones, T., Forster, I. W. & Clinch, P. G. Observations on the pollination of montgomery red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 9, 738–744 (1966).
doi: 10.1080/00288233.1966.10431563
Damgaard, C., Simonsen, V. & Osborne, J. L. Prediction of pollen-mediated gene flow between fields of red clover (Trifolium pratense). Environ. Model. Assess. 13, 483–490 (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s10666-007-9112-8
Campbell, J. W., Irvin, J. H. & Ellis, J. D. Bee contribution to partridge pea (Chamaecrista fasciculata) pollination in florida. Am. Midl. Nat. 179, 86–93 (2018).
doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-179.1.86
Frankie, G. et al. Native and non-native plants attract diverse bees to urban gardens in California. J. Pollinat. Ecol. 25, 16-23 (2019).
Colteaux, B. C., McDonald, C., Kolipinski, M., Cunningham, J. B. & Ghosh, S. A survey of pollinator and plant interactions in meadow and grassland habitats of Marin county California. Bios 84, 1–7 (2013).
doi: 10.1893/0005-3155-84.1.1
Anic, V., Henríquez, C. A., Abades, S. R. & Bustamante, R. O. Number of conspecifics and reproduction in the invasive plant Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae): Is there a pollinator-mediated allee effect?. Plant Biol. 17, 720–727 (2015).
pubmed: 25496191
doi: 10.1111/plb.12293
Taki, H., Okabe, K., Makino, S., Yamaura, Y. & Sueyoshi, M. Contribution of small insects to pollination of common buckwheat, a distylous crop. Ann. Appl. Biol. 155, 121–129 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00326.x
Jacquemart, A. L., Gillet, C. & Cawoy, V. Floral visitors and the importance of honey bee on buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) in central Belgium. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 82, 104–108 (2007).
doi: 10.1080/14620316.2007.11512205
Natsume, K., Hayashi, S. & Miyashita, T. Ants are effective pollinators of common buckwheat Fagopyrum esculentum. Agric. For. Entomol. 24, 446–452 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/afe.12493
Delgado-Carrillo, O. et al. Pollination services to crops of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and green tomato (Physalis ixocarpa) in the coastal region of Jalisco Mexico. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.18.585619 (2024).
doi: 10.1101/2024.03.18.585619
Jankiewicz, L. S. & Borkowski, J. The development of tomatillo (Physalis ixocarpa brot.) in polish conditions. II. Flowering and fruiting. Acta Agrobot. 43, 11–23 (1990).
doi: 10.5586/aa.1990.002
Cooley, H. & Vallejo-Marín, M. Buzz-pollinated crops: A global review and meta-analysis of the effects of supplemental bee pollination in tomato. J. Econ. Entomol. 114, 505–519 (2021).
pubmed: 33615362
pmcid: 8042731
doi: 10.1093/jee/toab009
Duenas-Lopez, M. A. Tropaeolum majus (nasturtium). CABI Compend. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.54181 (2022).
doi: 10.1079/cabicompendium.54181
Goulson, D. et al. Choosing rewarding flowers; perceptual limitations and innate preferences influence decision making in bumblebees and honeybees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1523–1529 (2007).
doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0384-4
Palmer-Young, E. C. et al. Chemistry of floral rewards: Intra- and interspecific variability of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites across taxa. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01335 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/ecm.1335
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. (2022).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. (2023).
Muff, S., Nilsen, E. B., O’Hara, R. B. & Nater, C. R. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 203–210 (2022).
pubmed: 34799145
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.10.009
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Maia, R. A. et al. Sunflower physiological adjustments to elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105448
Hoover, S. E. R. et al. Warming, CO
pubmed: 22221802
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01729.x
Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Moisset de Espanés, P., Franco-Cisterna, M., Petanidou, T. & Vázquez, D. P. Phenology determines the robustness of plant–pollinator networks. Sci. Rep. 8, 14873 (2018).
pubmed: 30291278
pmcid: 6173761
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33265-6
Vaudo, A. D., Dyer, L. A. & Leonard, A. S. Pollen nutrition structures bee and plant community interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2317228120 (2024).
pubmed: 38190523
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317228120
Kostić, A. Ž, Gercek, Y. C. & Bayram, N. E. Phenolic acids in pollen. In Pollen Chemistry & Biotechnology (eds Ecem Bayram, N. et al.) (Springer, 2023).
Forrest, J. R. K. & Rivest, S. Defence compounds in pollen: Why do they occur and how do they affect the ecology and evolution of bees?. New Phytol. 225, 1053–1064 (2020).
pubmed: 31569278
doi: 10.1111/nph.16230
Barberis, M., Calabrese, D., Galloni, M. & Nepi, M. Secondary metabolites in nectar-mediated plant-pollinator relationships. Plants 12, 550 (2023).
pubmed: 36771634
pmcid: 9920422
doi: 10.3390/plants12030550
Chau, K. D. & Rehan, S. M. Nutritional profiling of common eastern North American pollen species with implications for bee diet and pollinator health. Apidologie 55, 9 (2024).
doi: 10.1007/s13592-023-01054-4
Alzate-Marin, A. L. et al. Warming and elevated CO
pubmed: 33736351
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144899
Goulson, D., Hanley, M. E., Darvill, B., Ellis, J. S. & Knight, M. E. Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol. Conserv. 122, 1–8 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.017
Fowler, J. Specialist bees of the Northeast: Host plants and habitat conservation. Northeast. Nat. 23, 305–320 (2016).
doi: 10.1656/045.023.0210
Marsh, J. I., Hu, H., Gill, M., Batley, J. & Edwards, D. Crop breeding for a changing climate: Integrating phenomics and genomics with bioinformatics. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 1677–1690 (2021).
pubmed: 33852055
doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03820-3
Drewnowski, A. & Gomez-Carneros, C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: A review123. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72, 1424–1435 (2000).
pubmed: 11101467
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1424
Kaiser, N. et al. The role of conventional plant breeding in ensuring safe levels of naturally occurring toxins in food crops. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 100, 51–66 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.03.042
Wallace, D. H. et al. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86, 27–40 (1993).
pubmed: 24193380
doi: 10.1007/BF00223805
Canavar, Ö., Ellmer, F. & Chmielewski, F. M. Investigation of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in the ecological conditions of berlin (Germany). Helia 33, 117–130 (2010).
doi: 10.2298/HEL1053117C
Ban, D., Goreta, S. & Borošić, J. Plant spacing and cultivar affect melon growth and yield components. Sci. Hortic. 109, 238–243 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.04.015
Van Ploeg, D. & Heuvelink, E. Influence of sub-optimal temperature on tomato growth and yield: A review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 80, 652–659 (2005).
doi: 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511994
Proulx, R. On the general relationship between plant height and aboveground biomass of vegetation stands in contrasted ecosystems. PLoS ONE 16, e0252080 (2021).
pubmed: 34038429
pmcid: 8153471
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252080
Lakshmi, N. J. et al. Effect of CO
doi: 10.54386/jam.v19i3.620
Thomas, S. C. & Bazzaz, F. A. Elevated CO
doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13882.x
Aspinwall, M. J., Juenger, T. E., Rymer, P. D., Rodgers, A. & Tissue, D. T. Chapter 6 intraspecific variation in plant responses to atmospheric CO
Lenka, N. K. & Lal, R. Soil-related constraints to the carbon dioxide fertilization effect. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 31, 342–357 (2012).
doi: 10.1080/07352689.2012.674461
Hurlbert, S. H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187–211 (1984).
doi: 10.2307/1942661
Davies, G. M. & Gray, A. Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecol. Evol. 5, 5295–5304 (2015).
pubmed: 30151132
pmcid: 6102510
doi: 10.1002/ece3.1782
Oksanen, L. Logic of experiments in ecology: Is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue?. Oikos 94, 27–38 (2001).
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.11311.x
Schank, J. C. & Koehnle, T. J. Pseudoreplication is a pseudoproblem. J. Comp. Psychol. 123, 421–433 (2009).
pubmed: 19929110
doi: 10.1037/a0013579
Hurlbert, S. H. The ancient black art and transdisciplinary extent of pseudoreplication. J. Comp. Psychol. 123, 434–443 (2009).
pubmed: 19929111
doi: 10.1037/a0016221
Hurlbert, S. H. On misinterpretations of pseudoreplication and related matters: A reply to oksanen. Oikos 104, 591–597 (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12752.x
Colegrave, N. & Ruxton, G. D. Using biological insight and pragmatism when thinking about pseudoreplication. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 28–35 (2018).
pubmed: 29122382
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.10.007
Marshall, D. J. Principles of experimental design for ecology and evolution. Ecol. Lett. 27, e14400 (2024).
pubmed: 38591235
doi: 10.1111/ele.14400