Comparison of DeNovix, NanoDrop and Qubit for DNA quantification and impurity detection of bacterial DNA extracts.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
20
11
2023
accepted:
03
06
2024
medline:
17
6
2024
pubmed:
17
6
2024
entrez:
17
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate DNA quantification is key for downstream application including library preparations for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the quantification of standards for quantitative PCR. Two commonly used technologies for nucleic acid quantification are based on spectrometry, such as NanoDrop, and fluorometry, such as Qubit. The DS-11+ Series spectrophotometer/fluorometer (DeNovix) is a UV spectrophotometry-based instrument and is a relatively new spectrophotometric method but has not yet been compared to established platforms. Here, we compared three DNA quantification platforms, including two UV spectrophotometry-based techniques (DeNovix and NanoDrop) and one fluorometry-based approach (Qubit). We used genomic prokaryotic DNA extracted from Streptococcus pneumoniae using a Roche DNA extraction kit. We also evaluated purity assessment and effect of a single freeze-thaw cycle. Spectrophotometry-based methods reported 3 to 4-fold higher mean DNA concentrations compared to Qubit, both before and after freezing. The ratio of DNA concentrations assessed by spectrophotometry on the one hand, and Qubit on the other hand, was function of the A260/280. In case DNA was pure (A260/280 between 1.7 and 2.0), the ratio DeNovix or Nanodrop vs. Qubit was close or equal to 2, while this ratio showed an incline for DNA with increasing A260/280 values > 2.0. The A260/280 and A260/230 purity ratios exhibited negligible variation across spectrophotometric methods and freezing conditions. The comparison of DNA concentrations from before and after freezing revealed no statistically significant disparities for each technique. DeNovix exhibited the highest Spearman correlation coefficient (0.999), followed by NanoDrop (0.81), and Qubit (0.77). In summary, there is no difference between DeNovix and NanoDrop in estimated gDNA concentrations of S. pneumoniae, and the spectrophotometry methods estimated close or equal to 2 times higher concentrations compared to Qubit for pure DNA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38885212
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305650
pii: PONE-D-23-37349
pmc: PMC11182499
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Bacterial
0
Bacterial Lysates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0305650Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Versmessen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Biochem Genet. 2012 Dec;50(11-12):881-92
pubmed: 22847363
Biotechniques. 1995 Jan;18(1):62-3
pubmed: 7702855
Biotechniques. 2010 Apr;48(4):297-302
pubmed: 20569206
BMC Biotechnol. 2003 Oct 28;3:20
pubmed: 14583097
Genet Mol Res. 2014 Apr 29;13(2):3319-28
pubmed: 24841664
J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Aug 26;57(16):7221-6
pubmed: 19627145
Anal Biochem. 2009 Jun 15;389(2):165-70
pubmed: 19318083
Biotechniques. 1997 Sep;23(3):532-7
pubmed: 9298228
Biopreserv Biobank. 2012 Feb;10(1):4-11
pubmed: 24849748
Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Jun;12(3):165-75
pubmed: 24918763
Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2001 May;Appendix 4:Appendix 4K
pubmed: 18429085
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Dec 03;5:668
pubmed: 23206278
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 17;57(12):
pubmed: 34946321
Electrophoresis. 2014 Nov;35(21-22):3044-52
pubmed: 25088961
Anal Biochem. 2006 Nov 15;358(2):247-56
pubmed: 16942746
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 06;8(6):e62692
pubmed: 23762227
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Aug;14(4):264-70
pubmed: 27158753
Malays J Pathol. 2015 Aug;37(2):165-73
pubmed: 26277676
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Sep 27;166(1-2):311-5
pubmed: 23827352
Biol Proced Online. 2013 Feb 13;15(1):5
pubmed: 23406353
Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018 Jun 1;2018(6):
pubmed: 29858343
Biotechniques. 1994 Mar;16(3):402-4
pubmed: 7514422