Envirotyping within a multi-environment trial allowed identifying genetic determinants of winter oilseed rape yield stability.
Journal
TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik
ISSN: 1432-2242
Titre abrégé: Theor Appl Genet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0145600
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
20
12
2023
accepted:
28
05
2024
medline:
20
6
2024
pubmed:
20
6
2024
entrez:
19
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A comprehensive environmental characterization allowed identifying stable and interactive QTL for seed yield: QA09 and QC09a were detected across environments; whereas QA07a was specifically detected on the most stressed environments. A main challenge for rapeseed consists in maintaining seed yield while adapting to climate changes and contributing to environmental-friendly cropping systems. Breeding for cultivar adaptation is one of the keys to meet this challenge. Therefore, we propose to identify the genetic determinant of seed yield stability for winter oilseed rape using GWAS coupled with a multi-environmental trial and to interpret them in the light of environmental characteristics. Due to a comprehensive characterization of a multi-environmental trial using 79 indicators, four contrasting envirotypes were defined and used to identify interactive and stable seed yield QTL. A total of four QTLs were detected, among which, QA09 and QC09a, were stable (detected at the multi-environmental trial scale or for different envirotypes and environments); and one, QA07a, was specifically detected into the most stressed envirotype. The analysis of the molecular diversity at QA07a showed a lack of genetic diversity within modern lines compared to older cultivars bred before the selection for low glucosinolate content. The results were discussed in comparison with other studies and methods as well as in the context of breeding programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38898332
doi: 10.1007/s00122-024-04664-3
pii: 10.1007/s00122-024-04664-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
164Subventions
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-11-BTBR-0004
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche
ID : ANR-07-GPLA-016
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Angadi SV, Cutforth HW, Miller PR, Mcconkey BG, Entz MH, Brandt SA (2000) Response of three Brassica species to high temperature stress during reproductive growth. Can J Plant Sci 80:693–702. https://doi.org/10.4141/P99-152
doi: 10.4141/P99-152
Arifuzzaman M, Oladzadabbasabadi A, McLean P, Rahman M (2019) Shovelomics for phenotyping root architectural traits of rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus L.) and genome-wide association mapping. Mol Genet Gen 294:985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-019-01563-x
doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01563-x
Astle W, Balding DJ (2009) Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat Sci 24:451–471. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS307
doi: 10.1214/09-STS307
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Becker HC, Leon J (1988) Stablility analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
Beillouin D, jeuffroy MH, Gauffreteau A (2018) Characterization of spatial and temporal combinations of climatic factors affecting yields: an empirical model applied to the French barley belt. Agric Meteorol 262:402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.029
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.029
Bell JL, Sloan LC, Snyder MA (2004) Regional changes in extreme climatic events: a future climate scenario. J Climate 17:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017%3c0081:RCIECE%3e2.0.CO;2
doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0081:RCIECE>2.0.CO;2
Bouchet AS, Laperche A, Bissuel-Belaygue C, Baron C, Morice J, Rousseau-Gueutin M, Dheu JE, George P, Pinochet X, Foubert T, Maes O, Dugué D, Guinot F, Nesi N (2016) Genetic basis of nitrogen use efficiency and yield stability across environments in winter rapeseed. BMC Genet 17:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0432-z
doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0432-z
pubmed: 27628849
pmcid: 5024496
Browning BL, Browning SR (2009) A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet 84:210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005
pubmed: 19200528
pmcid: 2668004
Chandler J, Corbesier L, Spielmann P, Dettendorfer J, Stahl D, Apel K, Melzer S (2005) Modulating flowering time and prevention of pod shatter in oilseed rape. Mol Breed 15:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-004-2735-4
doi: 10.1007/s11032-004-2735-4
Chaves SFS, Evangelista JSPC, Trindade RS, Dias LAS, Guimarães PE, Guimarães LJM, Alves RS, Bhering LL, Dias KOG (2023) Employing factor analytic tools for selecting high-performance and stable tropical maize hybrids. Crop Sci 63:1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20911
doi: 10.1002/csc2.20911
Chidzanga C, Mullan D, Roy S, Baumann U, Garcia M (2022) Nested association mapping-based GWAS for grain yield and related traits in wheat grown under diverse Australian environments. Theor Appl Genet 135:4437–4456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04230-9
doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04230-9
pubmed: 36205736
pmcid: 9734238
Clarke WE, Higgins EE, Plieske J, Wieseke R, Sidebottom C, Khedikar Y, Batley J, Edwards D, Meng J, Li R, Lawley CT, Pauquet J, Laga B, Cheung W, Iniguez-Luy F, Dyrszka E, Rae S, Stich B, Snowdon RJ, Sharpe AG, Ganal MW, Parkin IA (2016) A high-density SNP genotyping array for Brassica napus and its ancestral diploid species based on optimised selection of single-locus markers in the allotetraploid genome. Theor Appl Genet 129:1887–1899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2746-7
doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2746-7
pubmed: 27364915
pmcid: 5025514
Cooper M, Tang T, Gho C, Hart T, hammer G, Messina C, (2020) Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity. Crop Sci 60:582–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20109
doi: 10.1002/csc2.20109
Corlouer E, Gauffreteau A, Bouchet AS, Bissuel-Belaygue C, Nesi N, Laperche A (2019) Envirotypes based on seed yield limiting factors allow to tackle G × E interactions. Agronomy 9:798. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9120798
doi: 10.3390/agronomy9120798
Cowling WA, Castro-Urrea FA, Stefanova KT, Li L, Banks RG, Saradadevi R, Sass O, Kinghorn BP, Siddique KHM (2023) Optimal contribution selection improves the rate of genetic gain in grain yield and yield stability in spring canola in Australia and Canada. Plants 12:383. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020383
doi: 10.3390/plants12020383
pubmed: 36679096
pmcid: 9863350
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers AC, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, 1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27:2156–2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
pubmed: 21653522
pmcid: 3137218
Delourme R, Laperche A, Bouchet AS, Jubault M, Paillard S, Manzanares-Dauleux MJ, Nesi N (2018) Genes and quantitative trait loci mapping for major agronomic traits in Brassica napus L. In: Liu S, Snowdon R, Chalhoub B (eds) The Brassica napus genome compendium of plant genomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43694-4_3
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43694-4_3
Deng C, Liu H, Yao Y, Guo S, Xiao L, Fu Z, Du D (2019) QTL analysis of frou yield related-traits for Brassica napus L. in multiple environments. Mol Breed 39:166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-019-1067-3
doi: 10.1007/s11032-019-1067-3
Diepenbrock W (2000) Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Field Crop Res 67:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00082-4
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00082-4
Diouf I, Derivot L, Koussevitzky S, Carretero Y, Bitton F, Moreau L, Causse M (2020) Genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity and genotype x environment interactions in a multi-parental tomato population. J Exp Bot 1:5365–5376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxp/eraa265
doi: 10.1093/jxp/eraa265
dos Santos Silva PP, e Sousa MB, de Oliveira EJ, Morgante CV, Silva de Oliveira CR, Vieira SL, Borel JC (2021) Genome-wide association study of drought tolerance in cassava. Euphytica 217:60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02800-4
doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02800-4
El-Soda M, Malosetti M, Zwaan BJ, Koornneef M, Aarts MGM (2014) Genotype × environment interaction QTL mapping in plants: lessons from Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci 19:390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.001
pubmed: 24491827
Ferreira ME, Satagopan J, Yandell BS, Williams PH, Osborn TC (1995) Mapping loci controlling vernalization requirement and flowering time in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 90:727–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222140
doi: 10.1007/BF00222140
pubmed: 24174034
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. AustJ Agric Res 14:742–754. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742
doi: 10.1071/AR9630742
Gajardo HA, Wittkop B, Soto-Cerda B, Higgins EE, Parkin IAP, Snowdon RJ, Frederico ML, Iniguez-Luy FL (2015) Association mapping of seed quality traits in Brassica napus L. using GWAS and candidate QTL approaches. Mol Breed 35:143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0340-3
doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0340-3
Gao X, Starmer J, Martin ER (2008) A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genet Epidemiol 32:361–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20310
doi: 10.1002/gepi.20310
pubmed: 18271029
Garin V, Malosetti M, van Eeuwijk F (2020) Multi-parent multi-environment QTL analysis: an illustration with the EU-NAM Flint population. Theor Appl Genet 133:2627–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03621-0
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03621-0
pubmed: 32518992
pmcid: 7419492
Hassani M, Mahmoudi SB, Saremirad A, Taleghani D (2023) Genotype by environment and genotype by yield*trait interactions in sugar beet: analyzing yield stability and determining key traits association. Sci Rep 13:23111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-51061-9
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-51061-9
Jeuffroy MH, Valantin-Morison M, Champolivier L, Reau R (2006) Azote, rendement et qualité des graines : mise au point et utilisation du modèle Azodyn-colza pour améliorer les performances du colza vis-à-vis de l’azote. OCL 13:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl.2006.0090
doi: 10.1051/ocl.2006.0090
Josse J, Husson F (2016) missMDA: a package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i01
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff P, Christensen R (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Lamichhane JR, Debaek P, Steinberg C, You MP, Barbetti MJ, Aubertot JN (2018) Abiotic and biotic factors affecting crop seed germination and seedling emergence: a conceptual framework. Plant Soil 432:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3780-9
doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3780-9
Leveugle M, Duborjal H, West M, Pothier A, Clementi A, Nesi N, Dyrszka E, Pichon J, Riviere N (2015) Rapsodyn Whole Exome capture and genotyping in the polyploid Brassica napus, in: JOBIM. Clermont-Ferrand.
Li F, Chen B, Xu K, Gao G, Yan G, Qiao J, Li J, Li H, Li L, Xiao X, Zhang T, Nishio T, Wu X (2016) A genome-wide assocation study of plant height and primary branch number in rapeseed (Brassica napus). Plant Sci 242:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.012
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.05.012
pubmed: 26566834
Li S, Zhu Y, Varshney RK, Zhan J, Zheng X, Shi J, Wang X, Liu G, Wang H (2020) A systematic dissection of the mechanisms underlying the natural variation of silique number in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) germplasm. Plant Biotech J 18:568–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13224
doi: 10.1111/pbi.13224
Lippert C, Listgarten J, Liu Y, Kadie CM, Davidson RI, Heckerman D (2011) FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat Methods 8:833–835. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1681
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1681
pubmed: 21892150
Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152339
doi: 10.1126/science.1152339
pubmed: 18239122
Lu K, Peng L, Zhang C, Lu J, Yang B, Xiao Z, Liang Y, Xu X, Qu C, Zhang K, Liu L, Zhu Q, Fu M, Yuan X, Li J (2017) Genome-wide association and transcriptome analyses reveal candidate genes underlying yield-determining traits in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci 8:206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00206
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00206
pubmed: 28261256
pmcid: 5309214
Malosetti M, Ribaut JM, Vargas M, Crossa J, van Eeuwijk FA (2008) A multi-trait multi-environment QTL mixed model with an application to drought and nitrogen stress trials in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphtyica 161:241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9594-0
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9594-0
Malosetti M, Bustos-Korts D, Boer MP, van Eeuwijk FA (2016) Predicting responses in multiple environments: issues in relation to genotype × environment interactions. Crop Sci 56:2210–2222. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.05.0311
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.05.0311
Mangin B, Casadebaig P, Cadic E, Blanchet N, Boniface M-C, Carrère S, Gouzy J, Legrand L, Mayjonade B, Pouilly N, André T, Coque M, Piquemal J, Laporte M, Vincourt P, Muños S, Langlade NB (2017) Genetic control of plasticity of oil yield for combined abiotic stresses using a joint approach of crop modelling and genome-wide association. Plant, Cell Environ 40:2276–2291. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12961
doi: 10.1111/pce.12961
pubmed: 28418069
Millet EJ, Welcker C, Kruijer W, Negro S, Coupel-Ledru A, Nicolas SD, Laborde J, Bauland C, Praud S, Ranc N, Presterl T, Tuberosa R, Bedo Z, Draye X, Usadel B, Charcosset A, Van Eeuwijk F, Tardieu F (2016) Genome-wide analysis of yield in Europe: allelic effects vary with drought and heat scenarios. Plant Physiol 172:749–764. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00621
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00621
pubmed: 27436830
pmcid: 5047082
Moreau L, Gallais A, Charwsset A (2004) Use of trial clustering to study QTL x environment effects for grain and related traits in maize. Theor Appl Genet 110:92–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1781-y
doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1781-y
pubmed: 15551040
Morrison MJ (1993) Heat stress during reproduction in summer rape. Can J Bot 71:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1139/b93-031
doi: 10.1139/b93-031
Pal L, Sandhu SK, Bhatia D (2021) Genome-wide association study and identification of candidate genes for seed oil content in Brassica napus. Euphytica 217:66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02783-2
doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02783-2
Parnaudeau V, Jeuffroy MH, Machet JM, Reau R, Bissuel C, Eveillard P, Ostergaard HS, Orson JA (2009) Methods for determining the nitrogen fertiliser requirements of some major arable crops in France. International Fertiliser Society, Cambridge 661:1–26
Quijada PA, Udall JA, Lambert B, Osborn TC (2006) Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): 1. Identification of genomic regions from winter germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 113:549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0323-1
doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0323-1
pubmed: 16767447
Raboanatahiry N, Chao H, Dalin H, Pu S, Yan W, Yu L, Wang B, Li M (2018) QTL alignment for seed yield and yield related traits in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci 9:1127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01127
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01127
pubmed: 30116254
pmcid: 6083399
Raman H, Shamaya N, Pirathiban R, McVittie B, Raman R, Cullis B, Easton A (2023) Quantitative traits loci for genotype and genotype by environment interaction effects for seed yield plasticity to terminal water-deficit conditions in canola (Brassica napus L.) Plants 12:720. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040720
Rathke GW, Behrens T, Diepenbrock W (2006) Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a review. Agr Ecosyst Environ 117:80–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.006
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.04.006
Ravier C, Meynard JM, Cohan JP, Jeuffroy MH (2017) Early nitrogen deficiencies favor high yield, grain protein content and N use efficiency in wheat. Eur J Agr 89:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.002
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.06.002
Rémy JC, Hébert J (1977) Le devenir des engrais azotés dans le sol. Compt-Ren L’acad D’agric Franç 63(1977):700–710
Resende RT, Piepho HP, Rosa GJM, Silva-Junior OB, e Silva FF, de Resende MDV, Grattapaglia D (2021) Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 134:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03684-z
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03684-z
pubmed: 32964262
Rincent R, Moreau L, Monod H, Kuhn E, Melchinger A, Malvar RA, Moreno-Gonzalez J, Nicolas S, Madur D, Combes V, Dumas F, Altmann T, Brunel D, Ouzunova M, Flament P, Dubreuil P, Charcosset A, Mary-Huard T (2014) Recovering power in association mapping panels with variable levels of linkage disequilibrium. Genetics 197:375–387. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.159731
doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.159731
pubmed: 24532779
pmcid: 4012494
Rousseau-Gueutin M, Belser C, Da Silva C, Richard G, Istace B, Cruaud C, Falentin C, Boideau F, Boutte J, Delourme R, Deniot G, Engelen S, Ferreira de Carvalho J, Lemainque A, Maillet L, Morice J, Wincker P, Denoeud F, Chevre AM, Aury JM (2020) Long-read assembly of the Brassica napus reference genome Darmor-bzh. GigaScience 9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa137
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa137
Shi J, R, Qiu D, Jiang C, Long Y, Morgan C, Bancroft I, Zhao J, Meng J, (2009) Unraveling the complex trait of crop yield with quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica napus. Genetics 182:851–861. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.101642
doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101642
pubmed: 19414564
pmcid: 2710164
Smith A, Norman A, Kuchel H, Cullis B (2021) Plant variety selection using interaction classes derived from factor analytic linear mixed models: models with independent variety effects. Front Plant Sci 12:737462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.737462
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.737462
pubmed: 34567051
pmcid: 8460066
Snowdon RJ, Wittkop B, Chen TW, Stahl A (2021) Crop adaptation to climate change as a consequence of long-term breeding. Theor Appl Genet 134:1613–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03729-3
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03729-3
pubmed: 33221941
Sun F, Liu J, Hua W, Sun X, Wang X, Wang H (2016) Identification of stable QTLs for seed oil content by combined linkage and association mapping in Brassica napus. Plant Sci 252:388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.09.001
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.09.001
pubmed: 27717475
Tang Y, Zhang G, Jiang X, Shen S, Guan M, Tang Y, Sun F, Hu R, Chen S, Zhao H, Li J, Lu K, Yin N, Qu C (2023) Genome-wide association study of glucosinolate metabolites (mGWAS) in Brassica napus L. Plants 12(3):639. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030639
doi: 10.3390/plants12030639
pubmed: 36771722
pmcid: 9921834
Touzy G, Rincent R, Bogard M, Lafarge S, Dubreuil P, Mini A, Deswarte JC, Beauchêne K, Le Gouis J, Praud S (2019) Using environmental clustering to identify specific drought tolerance QTLs in bread wheat (T. aestivum L.) Theor Appl Genet 132:2859–2880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03393-2
Udall JA, Quijada PA, Lambert B, Osborn TC (2006) Quantitative trait analysis of seed yield and other complex traits in hybrid spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.): 2. Identification of alleles from unadapted germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 113:597–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0324-0
doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0324-0
pubmed: 16767446
van Eeuwijk FA, Bink MCAM, Chenu K, Chapman SC (2010) Detection and use of QTL for complex traits in multiple environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.01.001
pubmed: 20137999
van Eeuwijk FA, Bustos-Korts DV, Malosetti M (2016) What shoudl students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype x environment interactions? Crop Sci 56:2119–2140. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375
Wang B, Wu Z, Li Z, Zhang Q, Hu J, Xiao Y, Cai D, Wu J, King GJ, Li H, Liu K (2018) Dissection of the genetic architecture of three seed-quality traits and consequences for breeding in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1336–1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12873
doi: 10.1111/pbi.12873
pubmed: 29265559
pmcid: 5999192
Wang TC, Casadebaig P, Chen TW (2023) More than 1000 genotypes are required to derive robust relationships between yield, yield stability and physiological parameters: a computational study on wheat crop. Theor Appl Genet 136:34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04264-7
doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04264-7
pubmed: 36897399
pmcid: 10006026
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x
pubmed: 28563791
Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigné J (2014) Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
Wricke G (1962) Evaluation method for recording ecological differences in field trials. Z Pflanzenzücht 47:92–96
Xavier A, Jarquin D, Howard R, Ramasubramanian V, Specht JE, Graef GL, Beavis WD, Diers BW, Song Q, Cregan PB, Neslon R, Mian R, Shannon JG, McHale L, Wang D, Schapaugh W, Lorenz AJ, Xu S, Muir WM, Rainey KM (2018) Genome-wide analysis of grain yield stability and environmental interactions in a multiparental soybean population. G3 Genes Genom Genet 8:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300300
doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300300
Xie Y, Xu J, Tian G, Xie L, Xu B, Liu K, Zhang X (2020) Unraveling yield-related traits with QTL analysis and dissection of QTL x environment interaction using a high-density bin map in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Euphytica 216:171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02708-5
doi: 10.1007/s10681-020-02708-5
Young LW, Wilen RW, Bonham-smith PC (2004) High temperature stress of Brassica napus during fowering reduces micro- and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production. J Exp Bot 55:485–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh038
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh038
pubmed: 14739270
Zandberg JD, Frenadez CT, Danilevicz MF, Thomas WJW, Edwards D, Batley J (2022) The global assessment of oilseed Brassica crop species yield, yield stability and the underlying genetics. Plants 11:2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11202740
doi: 10.3390/plants11202740
pubmed: 36297764
pmcid: 9610009
Zhao W, Wang X, Wang H, Tian J, Li B, Chen L, Chao H, Long Y, Xiang J, Gan J, Liang W, Li M (2016) Genome-Wide Identification of QTL for seed yield and yield-related traits and construction of a high-density consensus map for QTL comparison in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci 7:17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00017
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00017
pubmed: 26858737
pmcid: 4729939
Zheng M, Peng C, Liu H, Tang M, Yang H, Li X, Liu J, Sun X, Wang X, Xu J, Hua W, Wang H (2017) Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes for control of plant height, branch initiation height and branch number in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Front Plant Sci 8:1246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01246
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01246
pubmed: 28769955
pmcid: 5513965
Zou M, Shi T, Wang W, Ding G, Xu F, Shi L (2022) Genetic dissection of seed yield and yield-related traits in Brassica napus grown with constrasting nitrogen supplies. Mol Breed 42:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-022-01281-0
doi: 10.1007/s11032-022-01281-0
pubmed: 37309408
pmcid: 10248634