Clinical outcomes of aortic root repair using pericardial autograft for acute type a aortic dissection.
Humans
Aortic Dissection
/ surgery
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Pericardium
/ transplantation
Treatment Outcome
Autografts
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
/ surgery
Aged
Acute Disease
Postoperative Complications
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ methods
Transplantation, Autologous
Follow-Up Studies
Acute type A aortic dissection
Aortic root repair
Aortic sinus
Pericardial autograft
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
05
03
2024
accepted:
15
06
2024
medline:
27
6
2024
pubmed:
27
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root with root diameter no more than 45 mm, there are various aortic root repair techniques. In this study, a novel surgical technique using a pericardial autograft for aortic root repair was introduced. We described its surgical steps in detail and compare its clinical outcomes with direct suture technique. Between July 2017 and August 2022, 95 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic root repair were enrolled, including aortic root repair using pericardial autograft (group A, n = 49) or direct suture (group B, n = 46). The patient's clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and a 5-year follow-up was conducted. The 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative new-onset renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, stroke, and paraplegia occurred in 3%, 4%, 11%, 5%, and 2% of the overall patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality and complication rate between the two groups. The 30-day mortality and re-exploration for bleeding marked the primary endpoint events. Logistic regression analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between the primary endpoint events and surgical technique (odds ratio, 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.159; P = 0.026). The aortic valve insufficiency of the two groups were significantly improved after operation (group A, P < 0.001; group B, P < 0.001). During follow-up, there was no significant difference in short-term survival between the two groups after surgery (log-rank P = 0.75), and all patients were free from reoperation for aortic disease. Patients who underwent aortic root repair using pericardial autograft tended to have reduced 30-day mortality and a lower risk of re-exploration for bleeding. Using pericardial autograft for aortic root repair is a safe and useful approach for patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root with root diameter no more than 45 mm, there are various aortic root repair techniques. In this study, a novel surgical technique using a pericardial autograft for aortic root repair was introduced. We described its surgical steps in detail and compare its clinical outcomes with direct suture technique.
METHODS
METHODS
Between July 2017 and August 2022, 95 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic root repair were enrolled, including aortic root repair using pericardial autograft (group A, n = 49) or direct suture (group B, n = 46). The patient's clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and a 5-year follow-up was conducted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The 30-day mortality, re-exploration for bleeding, postoperative new-onset renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, stroke, and paraplegia occurred in 3%, 4%, 11%, 5%, and 2% of the overall patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality and complication rate between the two groups. The 30-day mortality and re-exploration for bleeding marked the primary endpoint events. Logistic regression analysis indicated that there was a significant correlation between the primary endpoint events and surgical technique (odds ratio, 0.002; 95% confidence interval, 0-0.159; P = 0.026). The aortic valve insufficiency of the two groups were significantly improved after operation (group A, P < 0.001; group B, P < 0.001). During follow-up, there was no significant difference in short-term survival between the two groups after surgery (log-rank P = 0.75), and all patients were free from reoperation for aortic disease.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Patients who underwent aortic root repair using pericardial autograft tended to have reduced 30-day mortality and a lower risk of re-exploration for bleeding. Using pericardial autograft for aortic root repair is a safe and useful approach for patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the aortic root.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38926836
doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02909-2
pii: 10.1186/s13019-024-02909-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
379Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Malaisrie SC, Szeto WY, Halas M, Girardi LN, Coselli JS, Sundt TM 3 et al. rd,. 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert consensus document: Surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162(3):735–758.e732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.053 .
Chang Y, Guo H, Qian X, Fang F. A case report of aortic root repair using a pericardial autograft for type A aortic dissection. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01356-z .
doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01356-z
pubmed: 33069247
pmcid: 7568387
Tang Y, Liao Z, Han L, Tang H, Song Z, Xu Z. Long-term results of modified sandwich repair of aortic root in 151 patients with acute type a aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25(1):109–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw416 .
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw416
pubmed: 28398529
Tanaka K, Morioka K, Li W, Yamada N, Takamori A, Handa M, et al. Adventitial inversion technique without the aid of biologic glue or Teflon buttress for acute type a aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(6):864–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.08.029 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.08.029
pubmed: 16275115
Rylski B, Bavaria JE, Milewski RK, Vallabhajosyula P, Moser W, Kremens E et al. Long-term results of neomedia sinus valsalva repair in 489 patients with type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(2):582–588; discussion 588–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.050 .
Yang B, Malik A, Waidley V, Kleeman KC, Wu X, Norton EL, et al. Short-term outcomes of a simple and effective approach to aortic root and arch repair in acute type a aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1360–e13701361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.089 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.089
pubmed: 29397965
Guo HW, Chang Y, Qian XY. Aortic root repair using pericardial autograft for acute type a aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161(2):e154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.093 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.093
pubmed: 32863032
Gudbjartsson T, Ahlsson A, Geirsson A, Gunn J, Hjortdal V, Jeppsson A, et al. Acute type a aortic dissection - a review. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020;54(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2019.1660401 .
doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1660401
pubmed: 31542960
David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;103(4):617–22.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)34942-6
pubmed: 1532219
Yacoub MH, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks EJ, Child A, Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115(5):1080–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70408-8 .
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70408-8
pubmed: 9605078
Ohno N, Maeda T, Kato O, Sato H, Ueno G, Yoshizawa K. Neomedia repair of the valsalva sinus in the treatment of acute type-A aortic dissection: long-term effectiveness and a case of pathology. Ann Vasc Dis. 2020;13(3):248–54. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00113 .
doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.20-00113
pubmed: 33384726
pmcid: 7751080
Duan WX, Wang WG, Xia L, Xue C, Yu B, Ren K, et al. Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection and intramural hematoma in the current era: lessons from the first registry of aortic dissection in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(8):927–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001459 .
doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001459
pubmed: 33879755
Neri E, Toscano T, Papalia U, Frati G, Massetti M, Capannini G, et al. Proximal aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion: presentation, management, and outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121(3):552–60. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.112534 .
doi: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112534
pubmed: 11241091
Chen YF, Chien TM, Yu CP, Ho KJ, Wen H, Li WY, et al. Acute aortic dissection type A with acute coronary involvement: a novel classification. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):4063–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.031 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.031
pubmed: 23890864
Yang B, Norton EL, Hobbs R, Farhat L, Wu X, Hornsby WE, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of aortic root repair and replacement in patients undergoing acute type a aortic dissection repair: twenty-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(6):2125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.129 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.129
pubmed: 30737109
Zhu C, Piao H, Wang Y, Wang T, Li D, Xu R, et al. A new aortic root reinforcement technique for acute type A aortic dissection surgery. Int Heart J. 2019;60(5):1131–6. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.18-609 .
doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-609
pubmed: 31484859
Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, et al. The international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283(7):897–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.7.897 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.283.7.897
pubmed: 10685714