Effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition: A finite element analysis.
Finite Element Analysis
Osseointegration
/ drug effects
Dental Materials
/ chemistry
Dental Implants
Zirconium
/ chemistry
Humans
Dental Porcelain
/ chemistry
Ceramics
/ chemistry
Materials Testing
Stress, Mechanical
Dental Stress Analysis
/ methods
Polymethyl Methacrylate
/ chemistry
Polymers
/ chemistry
Journal
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
ISSN: 1998-4057
Titre abrégé: J Indian Prosthodont Soc
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101255941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
25
08
2023
accepted:
06
05
2024
medline:
1
7
2024
pubmed:
1
7
2024
entrez:
1
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Studies have not been done to evaluate the peri-implant stress exerted by materials(like PEEK and resin matrix ceramics) in different osseointegration conditions. To investigate the effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition using finite element analysis. Eighteen different 3D FEA models of implant fixed with abutment were created involving 6 different occlusal materials (Heat cured temporary acrylic resin (PMMA), Bis-GMA, PEEK, Lithium disilicate, Resin matrix ceramics and translucent Zirconia) and different osseointegrated conditions (50%, 75%, 100%). Models were subjected to loading vertically and obliquely followed by evaluation of stress distribution. The results of the simulation obtained were analysed in terms of Von mises, maximum principal and minimal principal stresses using descriptive stastistics. PMMA (40.14 MPa on vertical loading and 66 MPa on oblique loading) resulted in the highest stresses and lithium disilicate (24 MPa on vertical loading and 52.40 MPa on oblique loading) resulted in least stresses among all the crown materials. Upon oblique loading, von Mises stress increases except for translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate (52.444 MPa on 50%, 47.733 MPa on 75%, and 43.973 MPa on 100% osseointegration). Minimal principal stress values decreased with increase in osseointegration upon oblique loading for PMMA, BisGMA, and PEEK. Translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate offer a better stress transmission. Minimal principal stress values of PEEK and BisGMA decreased with increasing osseointegration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38946514
doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_424_23
pii: 00660762-202424030-00013
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Materials
0
Dental Implants
0
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Dental Porcelain
12001-21-7
lithia disilicate
0
Polymethyl Methacrylate
9011-14-7
Polymers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
292-299Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.
Références
Iranmanesh P, Abedian A, Ghasemi E, Khazaei S. Stress analysis of different prosthesis materials in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis using 3D finite element method. Dent Hypothesis 2014;5:109-14.
Kaleli N, Sarac D, Külünk S, Öztürk Ö. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:437-45.
D’Amico C, Bocchieri S, Sambataro S, Surace G, Stumpo C, Fiorillo L. Occlusal load considerations in implant-supported fixed restorations. Prosthesis 2020;2:252-65.
Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:587-93.
Mosavar A, Ziaei A, Kadkhodaei M. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: A finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1317-26.
The glossary of prosthodontic terms: Ninth edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:e1-e105.
Trivedi S. Finite element analysis: A boon to dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2014;4:200-3.
Stegaroiu R, Kusakari H, Nishiyama S, Miyakawa O. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:781-90.
Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Bråne-mark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 199-209.
Kurniawan D, Nor FM, Lee HY, Lim JY. Finite element analysis of bone-implant biomechanics: Refinement through featuring various osseointegration conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:1090-6.
O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:648-57.
Cement-retained Crowns and Bridges with the Solid Abutment System: Straumann® Solid Abutment Prosthetic System (152.254/en). Available from: www.straumann.com . [ 2021Dec ].
LourenÇo AL, Jager N, Prochnow C, Milbrandt Dutra DA, Kleverlaan CJ. Young’s modulus and Poisson ratio of composite materials: Influence of wet and dry storage. Dent Mater J 2020;39:657-63.
Belli R, Wendler M, de Ligny D, Cicconi MR, Petschelt A, Peterlik H, et al. Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization. Dent Mater 2017;33:84-98.
Ansys Fluent 2020 R2 – Theory Guide; User Guide. Available from: http://www.ansys.com . [Last accessed on 2021 Jun].
Motta AB, Pereira LC, da Cunha AR, Duda FP. The influence of the loading mode on the stress distribution on the connector region of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed partial denture. Artif Organs 2008;32:283-91.
Makhija SK, Lawson NC, Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, McClelland JA, Louis DR, et al. Dentist material selection for single-unit crowns: Findings from the national dental practice-based research network. J Dent 2016;55:40-7.
Naert I, Leuven KU, Cam CA. Materials in fixed prosthodontics for indirect dental restorations. In: Ducheyne P, editor. Comprehensive Biomaterials II. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 467-81.
Arinc H. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic materials: A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2018;27:303-10.
Bijjargi S, Chowdhary R. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: A 2-D finite element analysis. J Investig Clin Dent 2013;4:172-7.
El-Anwar MI, AL-Azrag KE, Ghazy MH, Dawood LE. Influence of implant-abutment angulations and crown material on stress distribution on central incisor: A 3D FEA. Braz J Oral Sci 2015;14:323-9.
de Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ, de Jager N, Kuijs R, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:59-66.
Bonfante EA, Suzuki M, Lorenzoni FC, Sena LA, Hirata R, Bonfante G, et al. Probability of survival of implant-supported metal ceramic and CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:e168-77.
Duan Y, Griggs JA. Effect of elasticity on stress distribution in CAD/CAM dental crowns: Glass ceramic versus polymer-matrix composite. J Dent 2015;43:742-9.
Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9.
Ahmed SA, Eldosoky MA El-Wakad MT, Agamy EM. Effect of stiffness of single implant supported crowns on the resultant stresses. A finite element analysis. Egypt J Hosp Med 2016;63:172-84.
Soliman TA, Tamam RA, Yousief SA, El-Anwar MI. Assessment of stress distribution around implant fixture with three different crown materials. Tanta Dent J 2015;12:249-58.