Is still effective massive allograft reconstruction in parosteal osteosarcoma of the distal femur? Review of the literature and advantages of newer technologies.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jul 2024
08 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
26
03
2024
accepted:
25
06
2024
medline:
9
7
2024
pubmed:
9
7
2024
entrez:
8
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Parosteal Osteosarcoma is a well-differentiated, low-grade bone sarcoma. It most commonly occurs in the third decade of life, usually in the distal femur. This study aims to perform a literature review about the types of reconstructions reported and to analyze the results of an updated technique of resection using custom-made 3D-printed cutting guides. We perform a systematic literature review about parosteal osteosarcoma, evaluating treatments, margins, local recurrence, complications, and functional results when available. We also report a case treated in our Center with a revisited technique introducing custom-made 3D-printed cutting guides. We analyzed 12 studies with a total of 151 patients. The distal femur was the most frequently reported site (81.5%). After distal femur resection, reconstruction was performed with graft in most cases (48%), followed by prosthetic reconstruction (40%). Margins were wide in 85.5% of cases. The total incidence of local recurrence was 11%. Functional results were excellent in all cases, with a mean MSTS score of 86%. In our case, with the help of the jigs, the surgical technique was relatively easy, graft fusion excellent and fast, margins wide, and functional results excellent. In the literature, the most commonly used type of reconstruction after resection is biological with graft. Indeed, despite the increasing number of prosthetic reconstructions, the historical diaphysometaphyseal hemiresection and graft is still indicated in parosteal osteosarcoma of the distal femur. New technologies, such as the jigs we used, allow significant advantages during the procedure: reduce the resection and graft preparation time, allow a better match between components, and help to obtain safer margins, sparing as much bone as possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38978107
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04880-z
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-04880-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Review
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
395Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Geschickter CF, Copeland MM. Parosteal osteoma of bone: a new entity. Ann Surg. 1951;133(6):790–807.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-195106000-00006
pubmed: 14838523
pmcid: 1616939
Raymond AK. Surface osteosarcoma. ClinOrthop Relat Res 1991;140–8.
Okada K, Frassica FJ, Sim FH, Beabout JW, Bond JR, Unni KK. Parosteal osteosarcoma: a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(3):366–78.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199403000-00007
pubmed: 8126042
Hang JF, Chen PC. Parosteal osteosarcoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(5):694–9. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0030-RS.Review . (PMID: 24786129).
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0030-RS.Review
pubmed: 24786129
Han I, Oh JH, Na YG, Moon KC, Kim HS. Clinical outcome of parosteal osteosarcoma. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(2):146–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20902 .
doi: 10.1002/jso.20902
pubmed: 18050289
Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM, Hur RC. Parosteal osteosarcoma: value of MR imaging and CT in the prediction of histologic grade. Radiology. 1996;201(3):837–42.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939240
pubmed: 8939240
Capanna R, Ruggieri P, Biagini R, Campanacci M. Posterior diaphyso-metaphyseal hemiresection of the femur. Chir Organi Mov. 1984;69(1):91–6.
pubmed: 6488993
Prabowo Y, Kamal AF, Kodrat E, Prasetyo M, Maruanaya S, Efar TS. Parosteal osteosarcoma: a benign-looking Tumour, amenable to a variety of surgical reconstruction. Int J Surg Oncol. 2020;2020(1):4807612. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4807612 .
doi: 10.1155/2020/4807612
pubmed: 32550023
pmcid: 7275216
Funovics PT, Bucher F, Toma CD, Kotz RI, Dominkus M. Treatment and outcome of parosteal osteosarcoma: Biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103(8):782–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21859 .
doi: 10.1002/jso.21859
pubmed: 21240982
Hayashi K, Tsuchiya H, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Nishida H, Takeuchi A, Kimura H, Miwa S, Inatani H, Okamoto H, Yamada S, Ikeda H, Sawada-Kitamura S, Nojima T, Ooi A, Otsuka T. Diagnosis and treatment of low-grade osteosarcoma: experience with nine cases. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(4):731–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0592-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10147-013-0592-z
pubmed: 23881556
Okada K, Unni KK, Swee RG, Sim FH. High grade surface osteosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 46 cases. Cancer. 1999;85(5):1044–54.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1044::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-A
pubmed: 10091787
Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Raymond AK, Ayala AG, Carrasco CH, Benjamin RS, Jaffe N, Murray JA. Conventional and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Cancer. 1996;78(10):2136–45.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961115)78:10<2136::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-#
pubmed: 8918422
Johnson K, Davies AM, Evans N, Grimer RJ. Imaging recurrent parosteal osteosarcoma. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(3):460–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000673 .
doi: 10.1007/s003300000673
pubmed: 11288853
Campanacci M, Picci P, Gherlinzoni F, Guerra A, Bertoni F, Neff JR. Parosteal osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(3):313–21. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.66B3.6586725 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.66B3.6586725
pubmed: 6586725
Liu T, Liu ZY, Zhang Q, Zhang XS. Hemicortical resection and reconstruction using pasteurised autograft for parosteal osteosarcoma of the distal femur. Bone Joint J. 2013;95:1275–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31433 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31433
pubmed: 23997145
Lewis VO, Gebhardt MC, Springfield DS. Parosteal osteosarcoma of the posterior aspect of the distal part of the femur. Oncological and functional results following a new resection technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82(8):1083–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200008000-00003 .
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200008000-00003
pubmed: 10954096
Deijkers RL, Bloem RM, Hogendoorn PC, Verlaan JJ, Kroon HM, Taminiau AH. Hemicortical allograft reconstruction after resection of low-grade malignant bone tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(7):1009–14. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.13032 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.13032
pubmed: 12358363
Agarwal M, Puri A, Anchan C, Shah M, Jambhekar N. Hemicortical excision for low-grade selected surface sarcomas of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:161–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318059b8eb .
doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318059b8eb
pubmed: 17415008
Savvidou OD, Goumenos S, Trikoupis I, Kaspiris A, Melissaridou D, Gavriil P, Georgoulis J, Papagelopoulos PJ. Oncological and functional outcomes after hemicortical resection and biological reconstruction using allograft for parosteal osteosarcoma of the distal femur. Sarcoma. 2022;2022:5153924. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5153924 .
doi: 10.1155/2022/5153924
pubmed: 35692235
pmcid: 9184185
Kavanagh TG, Cannon SR, Pringle J, Stoker DJ, Kemp HB. Parosteal osteosarcoma. Treatment by wide resection and prosthetic replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(6):959–65. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2246298 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B6.2246298
pubmed: 2246298
Hoshi M, Matsumoto S, Manabe J, Tanizawa T, Shigemitsu T, Izawa N, Shi X, Kawaguchi N. Oncologic outcome of parosteal osteosarcoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2006;11(2):120–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-005-0545-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s10147-005-0545-2
pubmed: 16622746
Nouri H, Ben Maitigue M, Abid L, Nouri N, Abdelkader A, Bouaziz M, Mestiri M. Surface osteosarcoma: clinical features and therapeutic implications. J Bone Oncol. 2015;4(4):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2015.07.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2015.07.002
pubmed: 26730360
pmcid: 4678793
Wilke BK, Cooper AR, Gibbs CP, Scarborough MT, Spiguel AR. Long-term functional outcomes of distal femoral replacements compared to geographic resections for parosteal osteosarcomas of the distal femur. Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:177–81.
pubmed: 30104942
pmcid: 6047406
Lal H, Patralekh MK. 3D printing and its applications in orthopaedic trauma: a technological marvel. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9(3):260–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.07.022
pubmed: 30202159
pmcid: 6128305
Angelini A, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Pala E, Breda A, Ruggieri P. Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2019;43(1):123–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4232-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4232-0
pubmed: 30467646
Gouin F, Paul L, Odri GA, Cartiaux O. Computer-assisted planning and patient-specific instruments for bone tumor resection within the pelvis: a series of 11 patients. Sarcoma. 2014;2014:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/842709 .
doi: 10.1155/2014/842709
Wu H, Yang S, Liu J, Li L, Luo Y, Dai Z, Wang X, Yao X, Zhou F, Li X. 3D printing guide plate for accurate hemicortical bone tumor resection in metaphysis of distal femoral: a technical note. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02374-w .
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02374-w
pubmed: 34049580
pmcid: 8161929
Gkagkalis G, Moerenhout K, Rüdiger HA, Müller DA, Letovanec I, Cherix S. Pelvic chondrosarcoma treated by en bloc resection with patient-specific osteotomy guides and reimplantation of the extracorporeally irradiated bone as an osseocartilaginous structural orthotopic autograft: a report of two cases with description of the surgical technique. Case Rep Orthop. 2021;2(2021):5512143. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512143 .
doi: 10.1155/2021/5512143
Gómez-Palomo JM, Estades-Rubio FJ, Meschian-Coretti S, Montañez-Heredia E, Santos-de De, la Fuente FJ. Internal Hemipelvectomy and reconstruction assisted by 3D printing technology using premade intraoperative cutting and placement guides in a patient with pelvic sarcoma: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2019;9(4):e0060. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00060 .
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.19.00060
pubmed: 31855877