Hospital-Treated Infections and Risk of Disability Worsening in Multiple Sclerosis.


Journal

Annals of neurology
ISSN: 1531-8249
Titre abrégé: Ann Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7707449

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised: 08 06 2024
received: 08 12 2023
accepted: 13 06 2024
medline: 10 7 2024
pubmed: 10 7 2024
entrez: 10 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To investigate the association between infections and disability worsening in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with either B-cell depleting therapy (rituximab) or interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA). This cohort study spanned from 2000 to 2021, using data from the Swedish MS Registry linked to national health care registries, comprising 8,759 rituximab and 7,561 IFN/GA treatment episodes. The risk of hospital-treated infection was estimated using multivariable Cox models. The association between infections and increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores was assessed using a doubly robust generalized estimating equations model. Additionally, a piece-wise exponential model analyzed events of increased disability beyond defined cut-off values, controlling for relapses, and MRI activity. Compared with IFN/GA, rituximab displayed increased risk of both inpatient- and outpatient-treated infections (hazard ratio [HR], 2.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.90 and HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.67, respectively). An inpatient-treated infection was associated with a 0.19-unit increase in EDSS (95% CI, 0.12-0.26). Degree of worsening was greatest for progressive MS, and under IFN/GA treatment, which unlike rituximab, was more commonly associated with MRI activity. After controlling for relapses and MRI activity, inpatient-treated infections were associated with disability worsening in people with relapsing-remitting MS treated with IFN/GA (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.59-2.53), but not in those treated with rituximab. Compared to IFN/GA, rituximab doubled the infection risk, but reduced the risk of subsequent disability worsening. Further, the risk of worsening after hospital-treated infection was greater with progressive MS than with relapsing-remitting MS. Infection risk should be considered to improve long term outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38984615
doi: 10.1002/ana.27026
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Swedish Research Council
ID : 2020-02700
Organisme : Swedish Research Council
ID : 2021-01418
Organisme : Swedish Brain Fund
ID : FO2021-0277

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.

Références

Confavreux C, Vukusic S. Age at disability milestones in multiple sclerosis. Brain J Neurol 2006;129:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh714.
Manouchehrinia A, Westerlind H, Kingwell E, et al. Age related multiple sclerosis severity score: disability ranked by age. Mult Scler 2017;23:1938–1946. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690618.
Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Joseph J, et al. Relapses in multiple sclerosis are age‐ and time‐dependent. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1368–1374. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.145805.
Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, et al. Contribution of relapse‐independent progression vs relapse‐associated worsening to overall confirmed disability accumulation in typical relapsing multiple sclerosis in a pooled analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568.
Lublin FD, Häring DA, Ganjgahi H, et al. How patients with multiple sclerosis acquire disability. Brain 2022;145:3147–3161. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac016.
Satyanarayan S, Cutter G, Krieger S, et al. The impact of relapse definition and measures of durability on MS clinical trial outcomes. Mult Scler 2023;29:568–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585231157211.
Portaccio E, Bellinvia A, Fonderico M, et al. Progression is independent of relapse activity in early multiple sclerosis: a real‐life cohort study. Brain 2022;145:2796–2805. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac111.
Lassmann H, vanHorssen J, Mahad D. Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurol 2012;8:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168.
University of California, San Francisco MS‐EPIC Team, Cree BAC, et al. Silent progression in disease activity‐free relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2019;85:653–666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25463.
Graves JS, Krysko KM, Hua LH, et al. Ageing and multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2023;22:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00184-3.
Giovannoni G, Popescu V, Wuerfel J, et al. Smouldering multiple sclerosis: the “real MS”. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022;15:17562864211066751. https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864211066751.
Barzegar M, Vaheb S, Mirmosayyeb O, et al. Can coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) trigger exacerbation of multiple sclerosis? A retrospective study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2021;52:102947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2021.102947.
Buljevac D, Verkooyen RP, Jacobs BC, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae and the risk for exacerbation in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol 2003;54:828–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10759.
Andersen O, Lygner PE, Bergström T, et al. Viral infections trigger multiple sclerosis relapses: a prospective seroepidemiological study. J Neurol 1993;240:417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867354.
Sibley WA, Bamford CR, Clark K. Clinical viral infections and multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1985;1:1313–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92801-6.
Buljevac D, Flach HZ, Hop WCJ, et al. Prospective study on the relationship between infections and multiple sclerosis exacerbations. Brain 2002;125:952–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf098.
Apostolidis SA, Kakara M, Painter MM, et al. Cellular and humoral immune responses following SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis on anti‐CD20 therapy. Nat Med 2021;27:1990–2001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01507-2.
Monschein T, Hartung HP, Zrzavy T, et al. Vaccination and multiple sclerosis in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021;92:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-326839.
Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med 2020;133:1380–1390.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049.
Hillert J, Stawiarz L. The Swedish MS registry – clinical support tool and scientific resource. Acta Neurol Scand 2015;132:11–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12425.
Alping P, Piehl F, Langer‐Gould A, et al. Validation of the Swedish multiple sclerosis register: further improving a resource for pharmacoepidemiologic evaluations. Epidemiology 2019;30:230–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000948.
Brooke HL, Talbäck M, Hörnblad J, et al. The Swedish cause of death register. Eur J Epidemiol 2017;32:765–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0316-1.
Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T, et al. Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2015;138:3287–3298. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv258.
Ludvigsson JF, Appelros P, Askling J, et al. Adaptation of the Charlson comorbidity index for register‐based research in Sweden. Clin Epidemiol 2021;13:21–41. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S282475.
Zetterqvist J, Sjölander A. Doubly robust estimation with the R package drgee. Epidemiol Methods 2015;4:69–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2014-0021.
Sjölander A, Frisell T, Öberg S. Sibling comparison studies. Annu. Rev. Stat. Its Appl 2022;9:71–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-024521.
Vågberg M, Axelsson M, Birgander R, et al. Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing and monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: recommendations of the Swedish multiple sclerosis association and the Swedish neuroradiological society. Acta Neurol Scand 2017;135:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12667.
Luna G, Alping P, Burman J, et al. Infection risks among patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod, natalizumab, rituximab, and injectable therapies. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3365.
Tur C, Dubessy AL, Otero‐Romero S, et al. The risk of infections for multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder disease‐modifying treatments: eighth European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis focused workshop review. April 2021. Mult. Scler. J 2022;28:1424–1456. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585211069068.
Hauser SL, Bar‐Or A, Comi G, et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon Beta‐1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:221–234. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277.
Hauser SL, Bar‐Or A, Cohen JA, et al. Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2020;383:546–557. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
Svenningsson A, Frisell T, Burman J, et al. Safety and efficacy of rituximab versus dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome in Sweden: a rater‐blinded, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2022;21:693–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00209-5.
Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017;376:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606468.
Hauser SL, Kappos L, Arnold DL, et al. Five years of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: OPERA studies open‐label extension. Neurology 2020;95:e1854–e1867. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010376.
Giovannoni G, Kappos L, deSeze J, et al. Risk of requiring a walking aid after 6.5 years of ocrelizumab treatment in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: data from the OPERA I and OPERA II trials. Eur J Neurol 2022;29:1238–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14823.
Hauser SL, Cross AH, Winthrop K, et al. Safety experience with continued exposure to ofatumumab in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis for up to 3.5 years. Mult Scler 2022;28:1576–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585221079731.
Bar‐Or A, Calkwood JC, Chognot C, et al. Effect of ocrelizumab on vaccine responses in patients with multiple sclerosis: the VELOCE study. Neurology 2020;95:e1999–e2008. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010380.
Perry VH, Cunningham C, Holmes C. Systemic infections and inflammation affect chronic neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2015.
Holmes C, Cunningham C, Zotova E, et al. Systemic inflammation and disease progression in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2009;73:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b6bb95.
Danielson M, Wiklund A, Granath F, et al. Neuroinflammatory markers associate with cognitive decline after major surgery: findings of an explorative study. Ann Neurol 2020;87:370–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25678.
Forsberg A, Cervenka S, Jonsson Fagerlund M, et al. The immune response of the human brain to abdominal surgery. Ann Neurol 2017;81:572–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24909.
Starvaggi Cucuzza C, Longinetti E, Ruffin N, et al. Sustained low relapse rate with highly variable B‐cell repopulation dynamics with extended rituximab dosing intervals in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2023;10:e200056. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200056.
Claverie R, Perriguey M, Rico A, et al. Efficacy of rituximab outlasts B‐cell repopulation in multiple sclerosis: time to rethink dosing? Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2023;10:e200152. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200152.
Müller J, Cagol A, Lorscheider J, et al. Harmonizing definitions for progression independent of relapse activity in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. JAMA Neurol 2023;80:1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3331.
Meier S, Willemse EAJ, Schaedelin S, et al. Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein compared with neurofilament light chain as a biomarker for disease progression in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2023;80:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5250.
Brown CJ. After three decades of study, hospital‐associated disability remains a common problem. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020;68:465–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16349.
Corboy JR, Fox RJ, Kister I, et al. Risk of new disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis who continue or discontinue disease‐modifying therapies (DISCOMS): a multicentre, randomised, single‐blind, phase 4, non‐inferiority trial. Lancet Neurol 2023;22:568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00154-0.

Auteurs

Yihan Hu (Y)

Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Thomas Frisell (T)

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Peter Alping (P)

Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Huan Song (H)

Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yudi Pawitan (Y)

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Fang Fang (F)

Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Fredrik Piehl (F)

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Neurology, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH