Model-based frequency-and-phase correction of

2D linear‐combination model frequency‐and‐phase correction magnetic resonance spectroscopy spectral registration

Journal

Magnetic resonance in medicine
ISSN: 1522-2594
Titre abrégé: Magn Reson Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8505245

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised: 09 06 2024
received: 01 04 2024
accepted: 19 06 2024
medline: 11 7 2024
pubmed: 11 7 2024
entrez: 11 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Retrospective frequency-and-phase correction (FPC) methods attempt to remove frequency-and-phase variations between transients to improve the quality of the averaged MR spectrum. However, traditional FPC methods like spectral registration struggle at low SNR. Here, we propose a method that directly integrates FPC into a 2D linear-combination model (2D-LCM) of individual transients ("model-based FPC"). We investigated how model-based FPC performs compared to the traditional approach, i.e., spectral registration followed by 1D-LCM in estimating frequency-and-phase drifts and, consequentially, metabolite level estimates. We created synthetic in-vivo-like 64-transient short-TE sLASER datasets with 100 noise realizations at 5 SNR levels and added randomly sampled frequency and phase variations. We then used this synthetic dataset to compare the performance of 2D-LCM with the traditional approach (spectral registration, averaging, then 1D-LCM). Outcome measures were the frequency/phase/amplitude errors, the SD of those ground-truth errors, and amplitude Cramér Rao lower bounds (CRLBs). We further tested the proposed method on publicly available in-vivo short-TE PRESS data. 2D-LCM estimates (and accounts for) frequency-and-phase variations directly from uncorrected data with equivalent or better fidelity than the conventional approach. Furthermore, 2D-LCM metabolite amplitude estimates were at least as accurate, precise, and certain as the conventionally derived estimates. 2D-LCM estimation of FPC and amplitudes performed substantially better at low-to-very-low SNR. Model-based FPC with 2D linear-combination modeling is feasible and has great potential to improve metabolite level estimation for conventional and dynamic MRS data, especially for low-SNR conditions, for example, long TEs or strong diffusion weighting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38988088
doi: 10.1002/mrm.30209
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R00 AG062230
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R21 EB033516
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K99 AG080084
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K00 AG068440
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB016089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB023963
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB032788
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : P41 EB031771
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2024 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Références

Wilson M, Andronesi O, Barker PB, et al. Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: review and recommendations. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:527‐550. doi:10.1002/mrm.27742
Öz G, Alger JR, Barker PB, et al. Clinical proton MR spectroscopy in central nervous system disorders. Radiology. 2014;270:658‐679. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130531
Near J, Harris AD, Juchem C, et al. Preprocessing, analysis and quantification in single‐voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4257. doi:10.1002/nbm.4257
Near J, Edden R, Evans CJ, Paquin R, Harris A, Jezzard P. Frequency and phase drift correction of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time domain. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:44‐50. doi:10.1002/mrm.25094
Wilson M. Robust retrospective frequency and phase correction for single‐voxel MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:2878‐2886. doi:10.1002/mrm.27605
Henry PG, van de Moortele PF, Giacomini E, Nauerth A, Bloch G. Field‐frequency locked in vivo proton MRS on a whole‐body spectrometer. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:636‐642.
Edden RAE, Oeltzschner G, Harris AD, et al. Prospective frequency correction for macromolecule‐suppressed GABA editing at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 2016;44:1474‐1482. doi:10.1002/jmri.25304
Zaitsev M, Speck O, Hennig J, Büchert M. Single‐voxel MRS with prospective motion correction and retrospective frequency correction. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:325‐332. doi:10.1002/nbm.1469
Star‐Lack JM, Adalsteinsson E, Gold GE, Ikeda DM, Spielman DM. Motion correction and lipid suppression for 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:325‐330.
Keating B, Deng W, Roddey JC, et al. Prospective motion correction for single‐voxel 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:672‐679. doi:10.1002/mrm.22448
Thiel T, Czisch M, Elbel GK, Hennig J. Phase coherent averaging in magnetic resonance spectroscopy using interleaved navigator scans: compensation of motion artifacts and magnetic field instabilities. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1077‐1082. doi:10.1002/mrm.10174
Helms G, Piringer A. Restoration of motion‐related signal loss and line‐shape deterioration of proton MR spectra using the residual water as intrinsic reference. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:395‐400. doi:10.1002/mrm.1203
Waddell KW, Avison MJ, Joers JM, Gore JC. A practical guide to robust detection of GABA in human brain by J‐difference spectroscopy at 3 T using a standard volume coil. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:1032‐1038. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2006.11.026
Donahue MJ, Near J, Blicher JU, Jezzard P. Baseline GABA concentration and fMRI response. Neuroimage. 2010;53:392‐398. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.017
Evans CJ, Puts NAJ, Robson SE, et al. Subtraction artifacts and frequency (Mis‐)alignment in J‐difference GABA editing. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:970‐975. doi:10.1002/jmri.23923
Mikkelsen M, Tapper S, Near J, Mostofsky SH, Puts NAJ, Edden RAE. Correcting frequency and phase offsets in MRS data using robust spectral registration. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4368. doi:10.1002/nbm.4368
Wiegers EC, Philips BWJ, Heerschap A, van der Graaf M. Automatic frequency and phase alignment of in vivo J‐difference‐edited MR spectra by frequency domain correlation. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2017;30:537‐544. doi:10.1007/s10334‐017‐0627‐y
Schulte RF, Boesiger P. ProFit: two‐dimensional prior‐knowledge fitting of J‐resolved spectra. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:255‐263. doi:10.1002/nbm.1026
Ligneul C, Najac C, Döring A, et al. Diffusion‐weighted MR spectroscopy: consensus, recommendations and resources from acquisition to modelling. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91:860‐885. doi:10.1002/mrm.29877
Koolschijn RS, Clarke WT, Ip IB, Emir UE, Barron HC. Event‐related functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2023;276:120194. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120194
Tal A. The future is 2D: spectral‐temporal fitting of dynamic MRS data provides exponential gains in precision over conventional approaches. Magn Reson Med. 2023;89:499‐507. doi:10.1002/mrm.29456
Zöllner HJ, Davies‐Jenkins C, Simicic D, Tal A, Sulam J, Oeltzschner G. Simultaneous multi‐transient linear‐combination modeling of MRS data improves uncertainty estimation. Magn Reson Med. 2024;92:916‐925. doi:10.1002/mrm.30110
Považan M, Mikkelsen M, Berrington A, et al. Comparison of multivendor single‐voxel MR spectroscopy data acquired in healthy brain at 26 sites. Radiology. 2020;295:171‐180. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191037
Oeltzschner G, Zöllner HJ, Hui SCN, et al. Osprey: open‐source processing, reconstruction & estimation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data. J Neurosci Methods. 2020;343:108827. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108827
Hui SCN, Saleh MG, Zöllner HJ, et al. MRSCloud: a cloud‐based MRS tool for basis set simulation. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:1994‐2004. doi:10.1002/mrm.29370
Simpson R, Devenyi GA, Jezzard P, Hennessy TJ, Near J. Advanced processing and simulation of MRS data using the FID appliance (FID‐A)—an open source, MATLAB‐based toolkit. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77:23‐33. doi:10.1002/mrm.26091
Kreis R, Boer V, Choi IY, et al. Terminology and concepts for the characterization of in vivo MR spectroscopy methods and MR spectra: background and experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4347. doi:10.1002/nbm.4347
Gong T, Hui SCN, Zöllner HJ, et al. Neurometabolic timecourse of healthy aging. Neuroimage. 2022;264:119740. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119740
Hui SCN, Gong T, Zöllner HJ, et al. The macromolecular MR Spectrum does not change with healthy aging. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87:1711‐1719. doi:10.1002/mrm.29093
Hui SCN, Mikkelsen M, Zöllner HJ, et al. Frequency drift in MR spectroscopy at 3T. Neuroimage. 2021;241:118430. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118430
Zöllner HJ, Považan M, Hui SCN, Tapper S, Edden RAE, Oeltzschner G. Comparison of different linear‐combination modeling algorithms for short‐TE proton spectra. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4482. doi:10.1002/nbm.4482
Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993;30:672‐679. doi:10.1002/mrm.1910300604
Eilers PHC, Marx BD. Flexible smoothing with B‐splines and penalties. Stat Sci. 1996;11:89‐121. doi:10.1214/ss/1038425655
Wilson M. Adaptive baseline fitting for MR spectroscopy analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:13‐29. doi:10.1002/mrm.28385
Borbath T, Murali‐Manohar S, Dorst J, Wright AM, Henning A. ProFit‐1D—A 1D fitting software and open‐source validation data sets. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86:2910‐2929. doi:10.1002/mrm.28941
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021 https://www.R‐project.org/
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC; 2021, http://www.rstudio.com/
Rizzo R, Kreis R. Multi‐echo single‐shot spectroscopy combined with simultaneous 2D model fitting for fast and accurate measurement of metabolite‐specific concentrations and T2 relaxation times. NMR Biomed. 2023;36:e5016. doi:10.1002/nbm.5016
Hoefemann M, Bolliger CS, Chong DGQ, van der Veen JW, Kreis R. Parameterization of metabolite and macromolecule contributions in interrelated MR spectra of human brain using multidimensional modeling. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4328. doi:10.1002/nbm.4328
Choi IY, Andronesi OC, Barker P, et al. Spectral editing in 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy: experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4411. doi:10.1002/nbm.4411
Clarke WT, Stagg CJ, Jbabdi S. FSL‐MRS: an end‐to‐end spectroscopy analysis package. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:2950‐2964. doi:10.1002/mrm.28630
Cleve M, Krämer M, Gussew A, Reichenbach JR. Difference optimization: automatic correction of relative frequency and phase for mean non‐edited and edited GABA 1H MEGA‐PRESS spectra. J Magn Reson. 2017;279:16‐21. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2017.04.004
Shamaei A, Starcukova J, Pavlova I, Starcuk Z Jr. Model‐informed unsupervised deep learning approaches to frequency and phase correction of MRS signals. Magn Reson Med. 2023;89:1221‐1236. doi:10.1002/mrm.29498
Tapper S, Mikkelsen M, Dewey BE, et al. Frequency and phase correction of J‐difference edited MR spectra using deep learning. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:1755‐1765. doi:10.1002/mrm.28525
Clarke WT, Ligneul C, Cottaar M, Ip IB, Jbabdi S. Universal dynamic fitting of magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91:2229‐2246. doi:10.1002/mrm.30001
Marjańska M, Deelchand DK, Kreis R. Results and interpretation of a fitting challenge for magnetic resonance spectroscopy set up by the MRS study group of ISMRM. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87:11‐32. doi:10.1002/mrm.28942
Marjańska M, Terpstra M. Influence of fitting approaches in LCModel on MRS quantification focusing on age‐specific macromolecules and the spline baseline. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4197. doi:10.1002/nbm.4197
Zöllner HJ, Tapper S, Hui SCN, Barker PB, Edden RAE, Oeltzschner G. Comparison of linear combination modeling strategies for edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e4618. doi:10.1002/nbm.4618
Craven AR, Bhattacharyya PK, Clarke WT, et al. Comparison of seven modelling algorithms for γ‐aminobutyric acid–edited proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2022;35:e4702. doi:10.1002/nbm.4702
Giapitzakis IA, Borbath T, Murali‐Manohar S, Avdievich N, Henning A. Investigation of the influence of macromolecules and spline baseline in the fitting model of human brain spectra at 9.4T. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:746‐758. doi:10.1002/mrm.27467
Simicic D, Rackayova V, Xin L, et al. In vivo macromolecule signals in rat brain 1H‐MR spectra at 9.4T: parametrization, spline baseline estimation, and T2 relaxation times. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86:2384‐2401. doi:10.1002/mrm.28910
Chong DGQ, Kreis R, Bolliger CS, Boesch C, Slotboom J. Two‐dimensional linear‐combination model fitting of magnetic resonance spectra to define the macromolecule baseline using FiTAID, a fitting tool for arrays of interrelated datasets. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2011;24:147‐164. doi:10.1007/s10334‐011‐0246‐y
Wilson M. Spant: an R package for magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6:3646. doi:10.21105/joss.03646
Soher BJ, Clarke WT, Wilson M, Near J, Oeltzschner G. Community‐organized resources for reproducible MRS data analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88:1959‐1961. doi:10.1002/mrm.29387
Gajdošík M, Landheer K, Swanberg KM, Juchem C. INSPECTOR: free software for magnetic resonance spectroscopy data inspection, processing, simulation and analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2094. doi:10.1038/s41598‐021‐81193‐9
jMRUI jMRUI | Software for the clinical and biomedical MRS. Accessed November 28, 2023. http://www.jmrui.eu/
Naressi A, Couturier C, Devos JM, et al. Java‐based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med. 2001;12:141‐152. doi:10.1007/BF02668096
Stefan D, Cesare FD, Andrasescu A, et al. Quantitation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals: the jMRUI software package. Meas Sci Technol. 2009;20:104035. doi:10.1088/0957‐0233/20/10/104035

Auteurs

Dunja Simicic (D)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Helge J Zöllner (HJ)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Christopher W Davies-Jenkins (CW)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Kathleen E Hupfeld (KE)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Richard A E Edden (RAE)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Georg Oeltzschner (G)

Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Classifications MeSH