Pre-Randomization Predictors of Study Discontinuation in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Randomized Controlled Trial.
A4 study
Alzheimer’s disease
attrition
clinical trial
preclinical AD
study discontinuation
Journal
The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease
ISSN: 2426-0266
Titre abrégé: J Prev Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101638820
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
medline:
24
7
2024
pubmed:
24
7
2024
entrez:
24
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Participant discontinuation from study treatment in a clinical trial can leave a trial underpowered, produce bias in statistical analysis, and limit interpretability of study results. Retaining participants in clinical trials for the full study duration is therefore as important as participant recruitment. This analysis aims to identify associations of pre-randomization characteristics of participants with premature discontinuation during the blinded phase of the Anti-Amyloid treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study. All A4 trial randomized participants were classified as having prematurely discontinued study during the blinded period of the study for any reason (dropouts) or completed the blinded phase of the study on treatment (completers). The trial was conducted across 67 study sites in the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia through the global COVID-19 pandemic. The sample consisted of all 1169 A4 trial randomized participants. Pre-randomization demographic, clinical, amyloid PET and genetic predictors of study discontinuation were evaluated using a univariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), with discontinuation status as the binary outcome, each predictor as a fixed effect, and site as a random effect to account for differences among study sites in the trial. Characteristics significant at p<0.10 were then included in a multivariable GLMM. Among randomized participants, 339 (29%) discontinued the study during the blinded period (median follow-up time in trial: 759 days). From the multivariable analysis, the two main predictors of study discontinuation were screening State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores (OR = 1.07 [95%CI = 1.02; 1.12]; p=0.002) and age (OR = 1.06 [95%CI = 1.03; 1.09]; p<0.001). Participants with a family history of dementia (OR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.55; 1.01]; p=0.063) and APOE ε4 carriers (OR = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6; 1.04]; p=0.094) were less likely to discontinue from the study, with the association being marginally significant. In these analyses, sex, race and ethnicity, cognitive scores and amyloid/tau PET scores were not associated with study dropout. In the A4 trial, older participants and those with higher levels of anxiety at baseline as measured by the STAI were more likely to discontinue while those who had a family history of dementia or were APOE ε4 carriers were less likely to drop out. These findings have direct implications for future preclinical trial design and selection processes to identify those individuals at greatest risk of dropout and provide information to the study team to develop effective selection and retention strategies in AD prevention studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Participant discontinuation from study treatment in a clinical trial can leave a trial underpowered, produce bias in statistical analysis, and limit interpretability of study results. Retaining participants in clinical trials for the full study duration is therefore as important as participant recruitment.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This analysis aims to identify associations of pre-randomization characteristics of participants with premature discontinuation during the blinded phase of the Anti-Amyloid treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study.
DESIGN
METHODS
All A4 trial randomized participants were classified as having prematurely discontinued study during the blinded period of the study for any reason (dropouts) or completed the blinded phase of the study on treatment (completers).
SETTING
METHODS
The trial was conducted across 67 study sites in the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia through the global COVID-19 pandemic.
PARTICIPANTS
METHODS
The sample consisted of all 1169 A4 trial randomized participants.
MEASUREMENTS
METHODS
Pre-randomization demographic, clinical, amyloid PET and genetic predictors of study discontinuation were evaluated using a univariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), with discontinuation status as the binary outcome, each predictor as a fixed effect, and site as a random effect to account for differences among study sites in the trial. Characteristics significant at p<0.10 were then included in a multivariable GLMM.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among randomized participants, 339 (29%) discontinued the study during the blinded period (median follow-up time in trial: 759 days). From the multivariable analysis, the two main predictors of study discontinuation were screening State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores (OR = 1.07 [95%CI = 1.02; 1.12]; p=0.002) and age (OR = 1.06 [95%CI = 1.03; 1.09]; p<0.001). Participants with a family history of dementia (OR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.55; 1.01]; p=0.063) and APOE ε4 carriers (OR = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6; 1.04]; p=0.094) were less likely to discontinue from the study, with the association being marginally significant. In these analyses, sex, race and ethnicity, cognitive scores and amyloid/tau PET scores were not associated with study dropout.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In the A4 trial, older participants and those with higher levels of anxiety at baseline as measured by the STAI were more likely to discontinue while those who had a family history of dementia or were APOE ε4 carriers were less likely to drop out. These findings have direct implications for future preclinical trial design and selection processes to identify those individuals at greatest risk of dropout and provide information to the study team to develop effective selection and retention strategies in AD prevention studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39044496
doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.136
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
874-880Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
RR has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Alzheimer’s Association, American Heart Association, Eli Lilly and Eisai. KCH, RY, and JRS are employees and minor shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. KH, OL and KE have received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Alzheimer’s Association, American Heart Association, and Eisai. MD has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Eisai, reports consulting fees from Roche and his spouse is a full-time employee of Janssen. DMH is part of the AHEAD 3-45 Study team. AHEAD A3-45 Study is a public-private partnership with funding from the National Institutes of Aging/NIH, Eisai, and Co., GHR Foundation, Alzheimer’s Association, and philanthropic donors. Additionally, she receives direct funding from the Alzheimer’s Association and American Heart Association. ALP has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Alzheimer’s Association, Hart Family Foundation, Alector, Cognition Therapeutics, Eisai, Eli Lilly, and Vivoryon. She has served as a consultant for Medscape. AGS has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Alzheimer’s Association, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen, Vivoryon, Cassava, Bristol Myers Squibb, and the American College of Radiology. PSA has received grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Alzheimer’s Association, Foundation for NIH (FNIH), Lilly, Janssen and Eisai and consulting fees from Merck, Biogen, AbbVie, Roche, and Immunobrain Checkpoint. RAS reports grant support from Eisai, and Eli Lilly and reported serving as a consultant for AbbVie, AC Immune, Alector, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Ionis, Janssen, Genentech, Merck, Prothena, Roche, and Vaxxinity. JG has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Alzheimer’s Association, BrightFocus Foundation, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Genentech, and Eisai. He has received personal fees for providing consulting to SiteRx and editorial service to Alzheimer’s and Dementia.