Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 31 7 2024
pubmed: 31 7 2024
entrez: 31 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The comparative effects of specific blood pressure (BP) lowering treatments on patient-important outcomes following kidney transplantation are uncertain. Our 2009 Cochrane review found that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) improved graft function and prevented graft loss, while the evidence for other BP-lowering treatments was limited. This is an update of the 2009 Cochrane review. To compare the benefits and harms of different classes and combinations of antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients. We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 3 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating any BP-lowering agent in recipients of a functioning kidney transplant for at least two weeks were eligible. Two authors independently assessed the risks of bias and extracted data. Treatment estimates were summarised using the random-effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) processes. The primary outcomes included all-cause death, graft loss, and kidney function. Ninety-seven studies (8706 participants) were included. One study evaluated treatment in children. The overall risk of bias was unclear to high across all domains. Compared to placebo or standard care alone, CCBs probably reduce all-cause death (23 studies, 3327 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; I For kidney transplant recipients, the use of CCB therapy to reduce BP probably reduces death and graft loss compared to placebo or standard care alone, while ARB may reduce graft loss. The effects of ACEi and ARB compared to placebo or standard care on other patient-centred outcomes were uncertain. The effects of dual therapy, alpha-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists compared to placebo or standard care alone and the comparative effects of different treatments were uncertain.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The comparative effects of specific blood pressure (BP) lowering treatments on patient-important outcomes following kidney transplantation are uncertain. Our 2009 Cochrane review found that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) improved graft function and prevented graft loss, while the evidence for other BP-lowering treatments was limited. This is an update of the 2009 Cochrane review.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To compare the benefits and harms of different classes and combinations of antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients.
SEARCH METHODS METHODS
We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 3 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating any BP-lowering agent in recipients of a functioning kidney transplant for at least two weeks were eligible.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS
Two authors independently assessed the risks of bias and extracted data. Treatment estimates were summarised using the random-effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) processes. The primary outcomes included all-cause death, graft loss, and kidney function.
MAIN RESULTS RESULTS
Ninety-seven studies (8706 participants) were included. One study evaluated treatment in children. The overall risk of bias was unclear to high across all domains. Compared to placebo or standard care alone, CCBs probably reduce all-cause death (23 studies, 3327 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; I
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For kidney transplant recipients, the use of CCB therapy to reduce BP probably reduces death and graft loss compared to placebo or standard care alone, while ARB may reduce graft loss. The effects of ACEi and ARB compared to placebo or standard care on other patient-centred outcomes were uncertain. The effects of dual therapy, alpha-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists compared to placebo or standard care alone and the comparative effects of different treatments were uncertain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39082471
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0
Calcium Channel Blockers 0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00067990', 'NCT00933231', 'NCT00270153', 'NCT00502242', 'NCT02644395', 'NCT01602861', 'NCT02446548', 'NCT00047983', 'NCT02490904', 'NCT00155246', 'ISRCTN01577227', 'NCT00308425', 'NCT01007994', 'NCT01224860', 'NCT02030314', 'NCT01157234', 'NCT00140907', 'NCT04450953']

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD003598

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Auteurs

Patrizia Natale (P)

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

Pamela Kl Mooi (PK)

Department of Nephrology, Christchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Suetonia C Palmer (SC)

Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Nicholas B Cross (NB)

Department of Nephrology, Christchurch Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
New Zealand Clinical Research, 3/264 Antigua St, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Tess E Cooper (TE)

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Angela C Webster (AC)

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Westmead Applied Research Centre, The University of Sydney at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
Department of Transplant and Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia.

Philip Masson (P)

Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Jonathan C Craig (JC)

Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Giovanni Fm Strippoli (GF)

Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH