Antihypertensive treatment for kidney transplant recipients.
Humans
Kidney Transplantation
Antihypertensive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Calcium Channel Blockers
/ therapeutic use
Hypertension
/ drug therapy
Graft Survival
/ drug effects
Graft Rejection
/ prevention & control
Cause of Death
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Bias
Adult
Glomerular Filtration Rate
/ drug effects
Blood Pressure
/ drug effects
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2024
31 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The comparative effects of specific blood pressure (BP) lowering treatments on patient-important outcomes following kidney transplantation are uncertain. Our 2009 Cochrane review found that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) improved graft function and prevented graft loss, while the evidence for other BP-lowering treatments was limited. This is an update of the 2009 Cochrane review. To compare the benefits and harms of different classes and combinations of antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients. We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 3 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating any BP-lowering agent in recipients of a functioning kidney transplant for at least two weeks were eligible. Two authors independently assessed the risks of bias and extracted data. Treatment estimates were summarised using the random-effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) processes. The primary outcomes included all-cause death, graft loss, and kidney function. Ninety-seven studies (8706 participants) were included. One study evaluated treatment in children. The overall risk of bias was unclear to high across all domains. Compared to placebo or standard care alone, CCBs probably reduce all-cause death (23 studies, 3327 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; I For kidney transplant recipients, the use of CCB therapy to reduce BP probably reduces death and graft loss compared to placebo or standard care alone, while ARB may reduce graft loss. The effects of ACEi and ARB compared to placebo or standard care on other patient-centred outcomes were uncertain. The effects of dual therapy, alpha-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists compared to placebo or standard care alone and the comparative effects of different treatments were uncertain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The comparative effects of specific blood pressure (BP) lowering treatments on patient-important outcomes following kidney transplantation are uncertain. Our 2009 Cochrane review found that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) improved graft function and prevented graft loss, while the evidence for other BP-lowering treatments was limited. This is an update of the 2009 Cochrane review.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To compare the benefits and harms of different classes and combinations of antihypertensive drugs in kidney transplant recipients.
SEARCH METHODS
METHODS
We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 3 July 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
METHODS
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating any BP-lowering agent in recipients of a functioning kidney transplant for at least two weeks were eligible.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
METHODS
Two authors independently assessed the risks of bias and extracted data. Treatment estimates were summarised using the random-effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) processes. The primary outcomes included all-cause death, graft loss, and kidney function.
MAIN RESULTS
RESULTS
Ninety-seven studies (8706 participants) were included. One study evaluated treatment in children. The overall risk of bias was unclear to high across all domains. Compared to placebo or standard care alone, CCBs probably reduce all-cause death (23 studies, 3327 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.95; I
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
For kidney transplant recipients, the use of CCB therapy to reduce BP probably reduces death and graft loss compared to placebo or standard care alone, while ARB may reduce graft loss. The effects of ACEi and ARB compared to placebo or standard care on other patient-centred outcomes were uncertain. The effects of dual therapy, alpha-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists compared to placebo or standard care alone and the comparative effects of different treatments were uncertain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39082471
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003598.pub3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antihypertensive Agents
0
Calcium Channel Blockers
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00067990', 'NCT00933231', 'NCT00270153', 'NCT00502242', 'NCT02644395', 'NCT01602861', 'NCT02446548', 'NCT00047983', 'NCT02490904', 'NCT00155246', 'ISRCTN01577227', 'NCT00308425', 'NCT01007994', 'NCT01224860', 'NCT02030314', 'NCT01157234', 'NCT00140907', 'NCT04450953']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD003598Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.