Head-to-head comparison of composite and individual biomarkers to predict clinical benefit to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.
Humans
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Male
Female
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ metabolism
Middle Aged
Aged
Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
/ immunology
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Adult
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
/ immunology
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
17
10
2023
accepted:
15
04
2024
medline:
31
7
2024
pubmed:
31
7
2024
entrez:
31
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The efficacy of PD-1 blocking agents in advanced NSCLC has shown prolonged effectiveness, but only in a minority of patients. Multiple biomarkers have been explored to predict treatment benefit, yet their combined performance remains inadequately examined. In this study, we assessed the combined predictive performance of multiple biomarkers in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab. Pretreatment samples from 135 patients receiving nivolumab were used to evaluate the predictive performance of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), intratumoral (IT) localization of CD8 TILs, PD-1 high expressing TILs (PD1T TILs), CD3 TILs, CD20 B-cells, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and the Tumor Inflammation score (TIS). Patients were randomly assigned to a training (n = 55) and validation cohort (n = 80). The primary outcome measure was Disease Control at 6 months (DC 6m) and the secondary outcome measure was DC at 12 months (DC 12m). In the validation cohort, the two best performing composite biomarkers (i.e. CD8+IT-CD8 and CD3+IT-CD8) demonstrated similar or lower sensitivity (64% and 83%) and NPV (76% and 85%) compared to individual biomarkers PD-1T TILs and TIS (sensitivity: 72% and 83%, NPV: 86% and 84%) for DC 6m, respectively. Additionally, at 12 months, both selected composite biomarkers (CD8+IT-CD8 and CD8+TIS) demonstrated inferior predictive performance compared to PD-1T TILs and TIS alone. PD-1T TILs and TIS showed high sensitivity (86% and 100%) and NPV (95% and 100%) for DC 12m. PD-1T TILs could more accurately discriminate patients with no long-term benefit, as specificity was substantially higher compared to TIS (74% versus 39%). Composite biomarkers did not show improved predictive performance compared to PD-1T TILs and TIS alone for both the 6- and 12-month endpoints. PD-1T TILs and TIS identified patients with DC 12m with high sensitivity. Patients with no long-term benefit to PD-1 blockade were most accurately identified by PD-1T TILs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of PD-1 blocking agents in advanced NSCLC has shown prolonged effectiveness, but only in a minority of patients. Multiple biomarkers have been explored to predict treatment benefit, yet their combined performance remains inadequately examined. In this study, we assessed the combined predictive performance of multiple biomarkers in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.
METHODS
METHODS
Pretreatment samples from 135 patients receiving nivolumab were used to evaluate the predictive performance of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), intratumoral (IT) localization of CD8 TILs, PD-1 high expressing TILs (PD1T TILs), CD3 TILs, CD20 B-cells, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and the Tumor Inflammation score (TIS). Patients were randomly assigned to a training (n = 55) and validation cohort (n = 80). The primary outcome measure was Disease Control at 6 months (DC 6m) and the secondary outcome measure was DC at 12 months (DC 12m).
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the validation cohort, the two best performing composite biomarkers (i.e. CD8+IT-CD8 and CD3+IT-CD8) demonstrated similar or lower sensitivity (64% and 83%) and NPV (76% and 85%) compared to individual biomarkers PD-1T TILs and TIS (sensitivity: 72% and 83%, NPV: 86% and 84%) for DC 6m, respectively. Additionally, at 12 months, both selected composite biomarkers (CD8+IT-CD8 and CD8+TIS) demonstrated inferior predictive performance compared to PD-1T TILs and TIS alone. PD-1T TILs and TIS showed high sensitivity (86% and 100%) and NPV (95% and 100%) for DC 12m. PD-1T TILs could more accurately discriminate patients with no long-term benefit, as specificity was substantially higher compared to TIS (74% versus 39%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Composite biomarkers did not show improved predictive performance compared to PD-1T TILs and TIS alone for both the 6- and 12-month endpoints. PD-1T TILs and TIS identified patients with DC 12m with high sensitivity. Patients with no long-term benefit to PD-1 blockade were most accurately identified by PD-1T TILs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39083541
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293707
pii: PONE-D-23-30926
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0293707Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Hummelink et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: E.F.S. reports financial compensation to the institution for attendance of advisory boards and speaker engagements from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, DSI, Eli Lilly, MSD, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Regeneron, Roche Genentech, Roche Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi. Research support from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, MSD. All are outside the submitted work. GA Meijer is co-founder and board member (CSO) of CRCbioscreen BV, CSO of Health-RI (Dutch National Health Data infrastructure for research & innovation), and member of the supervisory board of IKNL (Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation). He has a research collaboration with CZ Health Insurances (cash matching to ZonMw grant) and he has research collaborations with Exact Sciences, Sysmex, Sentinel Ch. SpA, Personal Genome Diagnostics (PGDX), DELFi and Hartwig Medical Foundation; these companies provide materials, equipment and/or sample/genomic analyses. All are outside the submitted work. K.M. reports grants from AstraZeneca, non-financial support from Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, PGDx and DELFi, speakers fee from MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca, Benecke and consultant fee from Pfizer, BMS, Roche, MSD, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Diaceutics, Lilly, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Merck outside the submitted work. K.H., V.N, M.M, R.D.S., M.M.H, D.S.T. have nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.