Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Exercise
Occupational Groups
Occupational Health
Sedentary Behavior
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2024
06 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
11
01
2024
accepted:
11
07
2024
medline:
7
8
2024
pubmed:
7
8
2024
entrez:
6
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Too much sedentary behavior (SB) and too little physical activity (PA) place adult workers at risk for chronic illness. It remains unclear which occupations and subgroups within occupations have the highest and lowest SB and PA, and little is known about the effects of organizational factors on these behaviors and metrics. Thus, our main aims were to review and summarize evidence describing daily SB and PA collected using accelerometry across various occupations and to identify organizational factors influencing SB and PA. A literature search of six databases was performed for relevant studies published through March 2023. Eligible studies were in English, targeted working populations, had a sample size > 75, and objectively measured both SB and PA for seven consecutive days using accelerometers. Following PRISMA guidelines, 5,197 studies were identified, and 19 articles met our inclusion criteria. Five of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing time spent in SB, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) across occupations. Methodological quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool. We found that 63% of the studies reported daily time spent in SB and in MVPA, but fewer reported LPA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA. The average time spent in SB was 553.34 min/day, in LPA was 299.77 min/day, and in MVPA was 33.87 min/day. In occupational subgroup analysis, we observed that office workers had 2.3 h more SB, 2.4 less hours LPA, and 14 min less MVPA per day than nurses. However, most studies either did not specify workers' occupations or grouped occupations. Shift work and workplace facilities significantly influenced SB and PA, but organizational factors affecting these behaviors were not sufficiently investigated (e.g., occupation type, work environment and workplace facilities, and shift work). More research is needed to explore SB and PA patterns within occupational subgroups. Additionally, it is important to explore work-related individual (e.g., job task), interpersonal (e.g., social support from colleagues), organizational (e.g., work policy), and environmental factors influencing SB and PA. Future studies should also investigate the association of these factors with SB and PA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Too much sedentary behavior (SB) and too little physical activity (PA) place adult workers at risk for chronic illness. It remains unclear which occupations and subgroups within occupations have the highest and lowest SB and PA, and little is known about the effects of organizational factors on these behaviors and metrics. Thus, our main aims were to review and summarize evidence describing daily SB and PA collected using accelerometry across various occupations and to identify organizational factors influencing SB and PA.
METHODS
METHODS
A literature search of six databases was performed for relevant studies published through March 2023. Eligible studies were in English, targeted working populations, had a sample size > 75, and objectively measured both SB and PA for seven consecutive days using accelerometers. Following PRISMA guidelines, 5,197 studies were identified, and 19 articles met our inclusion criteria. Five of these studies were included in a meta-analysis comparing time spent in SB, light PA (LPA), and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) across occupations. Methodological quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We found that 63% of the studies reported daily time spent in SB and in MVPA, but fewer reported LPA, moderate PA, and vigorous PA. The average time spent in SB was 553.34 min/day, in LPA was 299.77 min/day, and in MVPA was 33.87 min/day. In occupational subgroup analysis, we observed that office workers had 2.3 h more SB, 2.4 less hours LPA, and 14 min less MVPA per day than nurses. However, most studies either did not specify workers' occupations or grouped occupations. Shift work and workplace facilities significantly influenced SB and PA, but organizational factors affecting these behaviors were not sufficiently investigated (e.g., occupation type, work environment and workplace facilities, and shift work).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
More research is needed to explore SB and PA patterns within occupational subgroups. Additionally, it is important to explore work-related individual (e.g., job task), interpersonal (e.g., social support from colleagues), organizational (e.g., work policy), and environmental factors influencing SB and PA. Future studies should also investigate the association of these factors with SB and PA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39107699
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19449-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-19449-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2123Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Smith L, McCourt O, Sawyer A, et al. A review of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour correlates. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66(3):185–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv164 .
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv164
pubmed: 27016747
Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854
pubmed: 30418471
pmcid: 9582631
U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Brief Summary of Findings on The Association between Physical Inactivity And Severe COVID-19 Outcomes. Accessed May 10, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/Brief-Summary-of-Findings-on-the-Association-Between-Physical-Inactivity-and-Severe-COVID-19-Outcomes.pdf
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) – Terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
pubmed: 28599680
pmcid: 5466781
Thivel D, Tremblay A, Genin PM, Panahi S, Rivière D, Duclos M. Physical activity, inactivity, and sedentary behaviors: definitions and implications in occupational health. Front Public Health. 2018;6:288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00288 .
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00288
pubmed: 30345266
pmcid: 6182813
Powell KE, King AC, Buchner DM, et al. The scientific foundation for the physical activity guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition. J Phys Act Health. 2018:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0618
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
Elgaddal N, Kramarow EA, Reuben C. Physical activity among adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief, no 443. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2022. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:120213 .
U.S. CDC.. Adult Physical Inactivity Outside of Work. U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated 2024 February 1. Accessed May 30, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/physical-activity/php/data/inactivity-maps.html
Lusa S, Punakallio A, Mänttäri S, et al. Interventions to promote work ability by increasing sedentary workers’ physical activity at workplaces - a scoping review. Appl Ergon. 2020;82:102962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102962 .
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102962
pubmed: 31568961
Prince SA, Rasmussen CL, Biswas A, et al. The effect of leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the health of workers with different occupational physical activity demands: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01166-z .
doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01166-z
pubmed: 34284795
pmcid: 8290554
van Tienoven TP, Deyaert J, Harms T, Weenas D, Minnen J, Glorieux I. Active work, passive leisure? Associations between occupational and non-occupational physical activity on weekdays. Soc Sci Res. 2018;76:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.08.012
pubmed: 30268271
Prince SA, Elliott CG, Scott K, Visintini S, Reed JL. Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0790-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0790-9
pubmed: 30940176
pmcid: 6444868
Labor Do. Division of Federal Employees' Compensation Procedure Manual. Accessed June 1, 2023. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/owcp/FECA/regs/compliance/DFECfolio/FECA-PT2/group3
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 .
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
pubmed: 33239350
Steeves JA, Tudor-Locke C, Murphy RA, et al. Daily physical activity by occupational classification in US adults: NHANES 2005–2006. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(12):900–11. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2017-0465 .
doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0465
pubmed: 30453820
Zhu X, Yoshikawa A, Qiu L, Lu Z, Lee C, Ory M. Healthy workplaces, active employees: a systematic literature review on impacts of workplace environments on employees’ physical activity and sedentary behavior. Build Environ. 2020;168:106455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106455 .
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106455
Lafrenz A, Lust T, Cleveland M, et al. Association between psychosocial and organizational factors and objectively measured sedentary behavior in desk-dependent office workers. Occup Health Sci. 2018;2(4):323–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0028-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s41542-018-0028-2
Mullane SL, Toledo MJL, Rydell SA, et al. Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0576-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0576-x
pubmed: 28859679
pmcid: 5580289
Gilson ND, Hall C, Holtermann A, et al. Sedentary and physical activity behavior in “Blue-Collar” workers: a systematic review of accelerometer studies. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(11):1060–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2018-0607 .
doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0607
pubmed: 31469366
Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK. Physical activity in U.S. adults: compliance with the physical activity guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(4):454–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016
pubmed: 21406280
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
pubmed: 33782057
pmcid: 8005924
Lewis M, Bromley K, Sutton CJ, McCray G, Myers HL, Lancaster GA. Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back! Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021;7(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x .
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x
pubmed: 33536076
pmcid: 7856754
Teresi JA, Yu X, Stewart AL, Hays RD. Guidelines for designing and evaluating feasibility pilot studies. Med Care. 2022;60(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001664 .
doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001664
pubmed: 34812790
pmcid: 8849521
Shim J, Fleisch E, Barata F. Wearable-based accelerometer activity profile as digital biomarker of inflammation, biological age, and mortality using hierarchical clustering analysis in NHANES 2011–2014. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36062-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36062-y
pubmed: 37291134
pmcid: 10250365
Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, et al. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: a systematic review and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47(9):1821–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0
pubmed: 28303543
pmcid: 6231536
Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Biddle SJH, Clemes S. The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2014;69:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.028 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.028
pubmed: 25193005
EndNote [Computer software]. Version: 20. Philadelphia: Clarivate; 2013.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
pubmed: 27919275
pmcid: 5139140
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, et al. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
Barker TH, Habibi N, Aromataris E, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for quasi-experimental studies. JBI Evid Synth. 2024;22(3):378–88. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-23-00268 .
doi: 10.11124/jbies-23-00268
pubmed: 38287725
Barker TH, Stone JC, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):494–506.
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00430
pubmed: 36727247
Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2127–33. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00099 .
doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-d-19-00099
pubmed: 33038125
Fernandez R, Sikhosana N, Green H, et al. Anxiety and depression among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e054528. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054528
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054528
pubmed: 34548373
Aittasalo M, Livson M, Lusa S, et al. Moving to business - changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior after multilevel intervention in small and medium-size workplaces. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):319. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4
pubmed: 28415993
pmcid: 5392953
Bergman F, Wahlström V, Stomby A, et al. Treadmill workstations in office workers who are overweight or obese: a randomised controlled trial. Article. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(11):e523–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30163-4 .
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30163-4
pubmed: 30322782
Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. 5th ed. Inc.: SAGE Publications; 2017.
Crespo NC, Sallis JF, Conway TL, et al. Worksite physical activity policies and environments in relation to employee physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(4):264–71. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.081112-QUAN-280 .
doi: 10.4278/ajhp.081112-QUAN-280
pubmed: 21361812
Ferrer HB, Cooper A, Audrey S. Associations of mode of travel to work with physical activity, and individual, interpersonal, organisational, and environmental characteristics. J Transp Health. 2018;9:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2018.01.009
Hajo S, Reed JL, Hans H, Tulloch HE, Reid RD, Prince SA. Physical activity, sedentary time and sleep and associations with mood states, shift work disorder and absenteeism among nurses: an analysis of the cross-sectional champlain nurses’ study. Peerj. 2020;8:e8464. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8464 .
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8464
pubmed: 32175183
pmcid: 7059756
Huang WC, Chang SH, Hsueh MC, Liao Y. Relationship of sleep regularity with device-based sedentary behavior time and physical activity time in working adults. Article. Sleep Health. 2023;9(1):86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2022.10.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2022.10.002
pubmed: 36456449
Keown MK, Skeaff CM, Perry TL, Haszard JJ, Peddie MC. Device-measured sedentary behavior patterns in office-based university ennployees. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(12):1150–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001467 .
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001467
pubmed: 30308622
Reed JL, Prince SA, Pipe AL, et al. Influence of the workplace on physical activity and cardiometabolic health: results of the multi-centre cross-sectional champlain nurses’ study. Int J Nurs Stud. M 2018;81:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.02.001
pubmed: 29499395
Rykov Y, Thach TQ, Dunleavy G, et al. Activity tracker-based metrics as digital markers of cardiometabolic health in working adults: cross-sectional study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(1):e16409. https://doi.org/10.2196/16409 .
doi: 10.2196/16409
pubmed: 32012098
pmcid: 7055791
Akksilp K, Koh JJE, Tan V, et al. The physical activity at work (PAW) study: a cluster randomised trial of a multicomponent short-break intervention to reduce sitting time and increase physical activity among office workers in Thailand. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023;8:100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100086 .
doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100086
pubmed: 37384135
Phaswana M, Gordon NF, Gradidge PJL. Sedentary behavior, physical activity patterns, and cardiometabolic risk factors in South African office-based workers. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276231210479 .
Deery CB, Hales D, Viera L, et al. Physical Activity Calorie Expenditure (PACE) labels in worksite cafeterias: effects on physical activity. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7960-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7960-1
pubmed: 31783747
pmcid: 6884791
Neil-Sztramko SE, Gotay CC, Demers PA, Campbell KL. Physical activity, physical fitness, and body composition of Canadian shift workers. Article. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58(1):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000574 .
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000574
pubmed: 26716853
Duncan S, Stewart T, Bo Schneller M, Godbole S, Cain K, Kerr J. Convergent validity of ActiGraph and Actical accelerometers for estimating physical activity in adults. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0198587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198587 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198587
pubmed: 29894485
pmcid: 5997323
De Craemer M, Verbestel V. Comparison of outcomes derived from the ActiGraph GT3X+ and the Axivity AX3 accelerometer to objectively measure 24-hour movement behaviors in adults: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):271.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010271
Stata Statistical Software. Release 18. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.; 2023.
Higgins JP LT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect. In: Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 63 (updated February 2022). Cochrane; 2022 updated February 2022.
Chi K-Y, Li M-Y, Chen C, Kang E, Cochrane T. Ten circumstances and solutions for finding the sample mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02217-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02217-1
pubmed: 37005690
pmcid: 10068165
Dettori JR, Norvell DC, Chapman JR. Fixed-effect vs Random-effects models for meta-analysis: 3 points to consider. Glob Spine J. 2022;12(7):1624–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221110527 .
doi: 10.1177/21925682221110527
Kitano N, Kai Y, Jindo T, Fujii Y, Tsunoda K, Arao T. Association of domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behavior with cardiometabolic health among office workers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022;32(8):1224–35.
doi: 10.1111/sms.14165
pubmed: 35426181
Kurosawa S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Koohsari MJ, Oka K. Accelerometer-measured diurnal patterns of sedentary behavior among Japanese workers: a descriptive epidemiological study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3814. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113814 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113814
pubmed: 32471293
pmcid: 7312996
Loprinzi PD. The effects of shift work on free-living physical activity and sedentary behavior. Prev Med. 2015;76:43–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.025
pubmed: 25895842
Ma J, Ma D, Kim J, Wang Q, Kim H. Effects of substituting types of physical activity on body fat mass and work efficiency among workers. Article. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105101 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105101
pubmed: 34065821
pmcid: 8151033
Husu P, Tokola K, Vähä-Ypyä H, Sievänen H, Vasankari T. Accelerometer-measured physical behavior and cardiorespiratory fitness as indicators of work ability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(7) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075414
Fujii Y, Kitano N, Kai Y, Jindo T, Arao T. Changes in accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior from before to after COVID-19 outbreak in workers. J Epidemiol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20230023 .
Clemes SA, O’Connell SE, Edwardson CL. Office workers’ objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(3):298–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000101 .
doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000101
pubmed: 24603203
Wu Y, Petterson JL, Bray NW, Kimmerly DS, O’Brien MW. Validity of the activPAL monitor to measure stepping activity and activity intensity: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2022;97:165–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.002
pubmed: 35964334
Veronica V-M, Orlagh OS, James AK, et al. Cross-sectional surveillance study to phenotype lorry drivers’ sedentary behaviours, physical activity and cardio-metabolic health. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e013162. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013162 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013162
Fishman EI, Steeves JA, Zipunnikov V, et al. Association between objectively measured physical activity and mortality in NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7):1303–11. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000885 .
doi: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000885
pubmed: 26848889
pmcid: 4911242
Kim H, Kang M. Sedentary behavior and metabolic syndrome in physically active adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 2003–2006. Am J Hum Biol. 2019;31(2):e23225. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23225 .
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23225
pubmed: 30734446
World Health Organization. Health Topics. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://www.who.int/health-topics/
Internationl Labour Organization. Topics. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/lang--en/index.htm
U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Accessed Sepember 27, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/index.htm
U.S Department of Labor. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://www.dol.gov/
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Standard Occupational Classification. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/soc/
U.S. Census Bureau. North American Industry Classification System. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://www.census.gov/naics/
U.S. NIOSH. Collecting and Using Industry and Occupation Data. Accessed November 11, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/coding/code.html
Prince SA, Reid RD, Bernick J, Clarke AE, Reed JL. Single versus multi-item self-assessment of sedentary behaviour: a comparison with objectively measured sedentary time in nurses. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):925–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.018
pubmed: 29500119
Peng G, Wang Y, Han G. Information technology and employment: the impact of job tasks and worker skills. J Ind Relat. 2018;60(2):201–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185617741924 .
doi: 10.1177/0022185617741924
Ráthonyi G, Kósa K, Bács Z, et al. Changes in workers’ physical activity and sedentary behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability. 2021;13(17):9524.
doi: 10.3390/su13179524
Wilms P, Schröder J, Reer R, Scheit L. The impact of "Home Office" work on physical activity and sedentary behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912344
Tomonaga R, Watanabe Y, Jiang Y, Nakagawa T, Yamato H. Comparison of physical activity and sedentary behavior between work-in-office and work-from-home: a self-controlled study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 9900: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003061 . https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000003061
Brusaca LA, Hallman DM, Januario LB, Gupta N, Oliveira AB, Mathiassen SE. Working at the office or from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of temporal patterns of sitting and non-sitting among normal-weight and overweight Brazilian office workers. J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023;2(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44167-023-00038-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00038-0
Falk GE, Mailey EL, Okut H, et al. Effects of sedentary behavior interventions on mental well-being and work performance while working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116401
U.S. CDC. 2013-2014 Examination Data - Continuous NHANES. Accessed September 27, 2023. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2013-2014/manuals/2014-Physicial-Activity-Monitor-Procedures-Manual-508.pdf
Liu F, Wanigatunga AA, Schrack JA. Assessment of physical activity in adults using wrist accelerometers. Epidemiol Rev. 2022;43(1):65–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxab004 .
doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab004
pubmed: 34215874