Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP
Humans
Norway
Primary Health Care
/ standards
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Cross-Sectional Studies
Evidence-Based Practice
Female
Reproducibility of Results
Male
Adult
Psychometrics
Attitude of Health Personnel
Middle Aged
Health Personnel
Qualitative Research
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Attitudes
Behavior
Construct validity
Content validity
Evidence-based practice
Healthcare professional
Internal consistency
Knowledge
Primary healthcare
Self-efficacy
Structural validity
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Aug 2024
06 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
09
04
2024
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
7
8
2024
pubmed:
7
8
2024
entrez:
6
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Access to valid and reliable instruments is essential in the field of implementation science, where the measurement of factors associated with healthcare professionals' uptake of EBP is central. The Norwegian version of the Evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP To evaluate the content validity of the EBP The qualitative interviews with primary healthcare professionals indicated that the content of the EBP The EBP Retrospectively registered (prior to data analysis) in OSF Preregistration. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/428RP .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Access to valid and reliable instruments is essential in the field of implementation science, where the measurement of factors associated with healthcare professionals' uptake of EBP is central. The Norwegian version of the Evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP
METHODS
METHODS
To evaluate the content validity of the EBP
RESULTS
RESULTS
The qualitative interviews with primary healthcare professionals indicated that the content of the EBP
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The EBP
REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Retrospectively registered (prior to data analysis) in OSF Preregistration. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/428RP .
Identifiants
pubmed: 39107763
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05842-z
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05842-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
841Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-1
Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB, Pattani R, Veroniki AA. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2019.
Albarqouni L, Hoffmann T, Straus S, Olsen NR, Young T, Ilic D, et al. Core competencies in evidence-based practice for Health professionals: Consensus Statement based on a systematic review and Delphi Survey. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(2):e180281.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281
Straus S, Glasziou P, Richardson W, Haynes R. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. Fifth edition ed: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
Paci M, Faedda G, Ugolini A, Pellicciari L. Barriers to evidence-based practice implementation in physiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(2).
Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Tabrizi JS, Azami-Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):793–802.
doi: 10.1111/jep.12222
da Silva TM, Costa Lda C, Garcia AN, Costa LO. What do physical therapists think about evidence-based practice? A systematic review. Man Ther. 2015;20(3):388–401.
doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.009
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180(S6):S57–60.
doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x
Saunders H, Gallagher-Ford L, Kvist T, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. Practicing Healthcare professionals’ evidence-based practice competencies: an overview of systematic reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2019;16(3):176–85.
doi: 10.1111/wvn.12363
Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, Rappolt S, Davis D. Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87(10):1284–303.
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070040
Saunders H, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K. Key considerations for selecting instruments when evaluating healthcare professionals’ evidence-based practice competencies: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(10):2301–11.
doi: 10.1111/jan.13802
de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in Medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511996214
Tilson JK, Kaplan SL, Harris JL, Hutchinson A, Ilic D, Niederman R, et al. Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:78.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78
Roberge-Dao J, Maggio LA, Zaccagnini M, Rochette A, Shikako K, Boruff J et al. Challenges and future directions in the measurement of evidence-based practice: qualitative analysis of umbrella review findings. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022.
Shaneyfelt T, Baum KD, Bell D, Feldstein D, Houston TK, Kaatz S, et al. Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1116–27.
doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1116
Landsverk NG, Olsen NR, Brovold T. Instruments measuring evidence-based practice behavior, attitudes, and self-efficacy among healthcare professionals: a systematic review of measurement properties. Implement Science: IS. 2023;18(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01301-3
Hoegen PA, de Bot CMA, Echteld MA, Vermeulen H. Measuring self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in evidence-based practice: a systematic review on psychometric properties. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021;3:100024.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100024
Oude Rengerink K, Zwolsman SE, Ubbink DT, Mol BW, van Dijk N, Vermeulen H. Tools to assess evidence-based practice behaviour among healthcare professionals. Evid Based Med. 2013;18(4):129–38.
doi: 10.1136/eb-2012-100969
Leung K, Trevena L, Waters D. Systematic review of instruments for measuring nurses’ knowledge, skills and attitudes for evidence-based practice. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(10):2181–95.
doi: 10.1111/jan.12454
Buchanan H, Siegfried N, Jelsma J. Survey instruments for Knowledge, skills, attitudes and Behaviour related to evidence-based practice in Occupational Therapy: a systematic review. Occup Ther Int. 2016;23(2):59–90.
doi: 10.1002/oti.1398
Fernández-Domínguez JC, Sesé-Abad A, Morales-Asencio JM, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Salinas-Bueno I, de Pedro-Gómez JE. Validity and reliability of instruments aimed at measuring evidence-based practice in physical therapy: a systematic review of the literature. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):767–78.
doi: 10.1111/jep.12180
Belita E, Squires JE, Yost J, Ganann R, Burnett T, Dobbins M. Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review. BMC Nurs. 2020;19:44.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00436-8
Egeland KM, Ruud T, Ogden T, Lindstrom JC, Heiervang KS. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the evidence-based practice attitude scale (EBPAS): to measure implementation readiness. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0114-3
Rye M, Torres EM, Friborg O, Skre I, Aarons GA. The evidence-based practice attitude Scale-36 (EBPAS-36): a brief and pragmatic measure of attitudes to evidence-based practice validated in US and Norwegian samples. Implement Science: IS. 2017;12(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0573-0
Grønvik CKU, Ødegård A, Bjørkly S. Factor Analytical Examination of the evidence-based practice beliefs scale: indications of a two-factor structure. scirp.org; 2016.
Moore JL, Friis S, Graham ID, Gundersen ET, Nordvik JE. Reported use of evidence in clinical practice: a survey of rehabilitation practices in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):379.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3193-8
Titlestad KB, Snibsoer AK, Stromme H, Nortvedt MW, Graverholt B, Espehaug B. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the evidence-based practice profile. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2373-7
McEvoy MP, Williams MT, Olds TS. Development and psychometric testing of a trans-professional evidence-based practice profile questionnaire. Med Teach. 2010;32(9):e373–80.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.494741
Hu MY, Wu YN, McEvoy MP, Wang YF, Cong WL, Liu LP, et al. Development and validation of the Chinese version of the evidence-based practice profile questionnaire (EBP < sup > 2 Q). BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):280.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02189-z
Jia Y, Zhuang X, Zhang Y, Meng G, Qin S, Shi WX, et al. Adaptation and validation of the evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire (EBP(2)Q) for clinical postgraduates in a Chinese context. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):588.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04594-6
Panczyk M, Belowska J, Zarzeka A, Samolinski L, Zmuda-Trzebiatowska H, Gotlib J. Validation study of the Polish version of the evidence-based Practice Profile Questionnaire. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0877-4
Belowska J, Panczyk M, Zarzeka A, Iwanow L, Cieślak I, Gotlib J. Promoting evidence-based practice - perceived knowledge, behaviours and attitudes of Polish nurses: a cross-sectional validation study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(2):397–405.
doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1489993
Knowledge A. Confidence, and Behavior Related to Evidence-based Practice Among Healthcare Professionals Working in Primary Healthcare. Protocol of a Cross-sectional Survey [Internet]. OSF. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/428RP
Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso J, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159–70.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–57.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick D, Alonso J, Bouter LM, Vet HCD et al. Cosmin Study design checklist for patient-reported outecome measurement instruments [PDF]. 2019. https://www.cosmin.nl/tools/checklists-assessing-methodological-study-qualities/ . https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(8):2197–218.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
Bjerk M, Flottorp SA, Pripp AH, Øien H, Hansen TM, Foy R, et al. Tailored implementation of national recommendations on fall prevention among older adults in municipalities in Norway (FALLPREVENT trial): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial. Implement Science: IS. 2024;19(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01334-2
Presser S, Couper MP, Lessler JT, Martin E, Martin J, Rothgeb JM et al. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questions. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires2004. pp. 1–22.
Willis GB. Analysis of the cognitive interview in Questionnaire Design. Cary: Cary: Oxford University Press, Incorporated;; 2015.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. 18 ed. College Station, TX: StataCorp; 2023.
Hu L-t, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) – user manual. 2018. https://www.cosmin.nl/tools/guideline-conducting-systematic-review-outcome-measures/
Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: New York: Guilford; 2015.
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York, New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
doi: 10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001
de Leeuw ED, Hox JJ, Dillman DA. International handbook of survey methodology. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008. x, 549-x, p.
Solís Salazar M. The dilemma of combining positive and negative items in scales. Psicothema. 2015;27(2):192–200.
Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 4th ed. ed. Maidenhead: Open University, McGraw-Hill;; 2014.