The effect of early childhood non-nutritive sucking behavior including pacifiers on malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
digit sucking
malocclusion
non-nutritive sucking habit
pacifier sucking
Journal
European journal of orthodontics
ISSN: 1460-2210
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909010
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2024
01 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
9
8
2024
pubmed:
9
8
2024
entrez:
9
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs. Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial. To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion. The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland. One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education. Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding. Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots. It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed. From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers. No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition. The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE
BACKGROUND
Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs.
TRIAL DESIGN
METHODS
Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion.
PARTICIPANTS
METHODS
The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland.
INTERVENTION
METHODS
One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education.
OUTCOMES
RESULTS
Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding.
RANDOMIZATION METHOD
UNASSIGNED
Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots.
BLINDING
METHODS
It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers.
HARMS
RESULTS
No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39119981
pii: 7730440
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae024
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01854502']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : The Regional State Administrative Agency of Southern Finland
Organisme : DentoBon
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.