Evaluation of adapted parent training for challenging behaviour in pre-school children with moderate to severe intellectual developmental disabilities: A randomised controlled trial.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 18 09 2023
accepted: 10 06 2024
medline: 13 8 2024
pubmed: 13 8 2024
entrez: 13 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of parenting interventions to improve disruptive behaviour in children with intellectual developmental disabilities. This clinical trial evaluated whether an adapted group parenting intervention for preschool children with intellectual developmental disabilities who display challenging behaviour is superior to treatment as usual in England. 261 children aged 30-59 months with moderate to severe intellectual developmental disabilities and challenging behaviour were randomised to either the intervention (Stepping Stones Triple P) and treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. The primary outcome was the parent-rated Child Behaviour Checklist at 52 weeks after randomisation. A health economic evaluation was also completed. We found no significant difference between arms on the primary outcome (mean difference -4.23; 95% CI: -9.99 to 1.53; p = 0.147). However, a subgroup analysis suggests the intervention was effective for participants randomised before the COVID-19 pandemic (mean difference -7.12; 95% CI: -13.44 to -0.81; p = 0.046). Furthermore, a complier average causal effects analysis (mean difference -11.53; 95% CI: -26.97 to 3.91; p = 0.143) suggests the intervention requires participants to receive a sufficient intervention dose. The intervention generated statistically significant cost savings (-£1,057.88; 95% CI -£3,218.6 to -£46.67) but the mean point estimate in Quality Adjusted Life Years was similar in both groups. This study did not find an effect of the intervention on reducing challenging behaviour, but this may have been influenced by problems with engagement. The intervention could be considered by services as an early intervention if families are supported to attend, especially given its low cost.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39137195
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306182
pii: PONE-D-23-28009
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0306182

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Royston et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Rachel Royston (R)

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Michael Absoud (M)

Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Gareth Ambler (G)

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Jacqueline Barnes (J)

Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Rachael Hunter (R)

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

Marinos Kyriakopoulos (M)

1st Department of Psychiatry National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Tamara Ondruskova (T)

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Kate Oulton (K)

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Eleni Paliokosta (E)

The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, Kentish Town Health Centre, London, United Kingdom.

Monica Panca (M)

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Medical School, London, United Kingdom.

Aditya Sharma (A)

Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust & Newcastle University, Walkergate Park Centre for Neurorehabilitation and Neuropsychiatry, Newcastle, United Kingdom.

Vicky Slonim (V)

Evelina London Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital, and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Una Summerson (U)

Contact, London, United Kingdom.

Alastair Sutcliffe (A)

Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Megan Thomas (M)

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, United Kingdom.

Chen Qu (C)

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Angela Hassiotis (A)

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH