Kidney and Cardiovascular Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Type 2 Diabetes.
Humans
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ drug therapy
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Male
Female
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
/ agonists
Middle Aged
Aged
Glomerular Filtration Rate
/ drug effects
Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
cardiovascular disease
chronic kidney disease
diabetes mellitus
glucagon-like 1 receptor agonists
sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Aug 2024
20 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
22
04
2024
revised:
29
05
2024
accepted:
10
06
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emerging data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) improve kidney outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Direct comparisons of the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 RA with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a first-line therapy for this population, are needed. The authors compared kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for new users of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs with T2D. Using propensity score overlap weighting, we analyzed electronic health record data from 20 U.S. health systems contributing to PCORnet between 2015 and 2020. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring. In addition, we examined cardiovascular and safety outcomes. The weighted study cohort included 35,004 SGLT2i and 47,268 GLP-1 RA initiators. Over a median of 1.2 years, the primary outcome did not differ between treatments (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-1.02), although SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.91). Risks of mortality (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.93-1.14), and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13) did not differ. Genital mycotic infections were more common for SGLT2i initiators, but other safety outcomes did not differ. The results were similar regardless of chronic kidney disease status. SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs led to similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D, though SGLT2i initiation was associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline. (Evaluating Comparative Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Population With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease; NCT05465317).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Emerging data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) improve kidney outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Direct comparisons of the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 RA with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a first-line therapy for this population, are needed.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The authors compared kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for new users of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs with T2D.
METHODS
METHODS
Using propensity score overlap weighting, we analyzed electronic health record data from 20 U.S. health systems contributing to PCORnet between 2015 and 2020. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring. In addition, we examined cardiovascular and safety outcomes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The weighted study cohort included 35,004 SGLT2i and 47,268 GLP-1 RA initiators. Over a median of 1.2 years, the primary outcome did not differ between treatments (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-1.02), although SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.91). Risks of mortality (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.93-1.14), and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13) did not differ. Genital mycotic infections were more common for SGLT2i initiators, but other safety outcomes did not differ. The results were similar regardless of chronic kidney disease status.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs led to similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D, though SGLT2i initiation was associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline. (Evaluating Comparative Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Population With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease; NCT05465317).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39142723
pii: S0735-1097(24)07627-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.016
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05465317']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
696-708Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the Boehringer Ingelheim & Lilly Diabetes Alliance. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Boehringer Ingelheim was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations. Dr Butler has received consultant honoraria from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards, Element Science, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Roche, Sequana, SQ Innovation, and Vifor. Dr Pagidipati has received research support from Alnylam, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eggland’s Best, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Verily Life Sciences; has served on consultation/advisory panels for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; has served as an executive committee member for trials sponsored by Novo Nordisk and Amgen; has served on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards for trials sponsored by Johnson and Johnson and Novartis; and has served on the medical advisory board for Miga Health. Dr Fonseca has received research support (to Tulane) from Fractyl and Jaguar Gene Therapy; has received consultant honoraria from Asahi, Bayer, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Corcept; has stock or stock options in Mellitus Health, BRAVO4Health, Amgen, and Abbott; and has patents pending for BRAVO risk engine for predicting diabetes complications and PAX4 gene therapy for type 1 diabetes. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.