Midterm complications after primary obstetrical anal sphincter injury repair in France.
Anal sphincter repair
Perineal care
Perineal trauma
Wound breakdown
Wound complication
Wound infection
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Aug 2024
14 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
09
02
2024
accepted:
09
07
2024
medline:
15
8
2024
pubmed:
15
8
2024
entrez:
14
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Incidence of complications following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) during vaginal delivery are poorly defined. They are only studied in high level maternities, small cohorts, all stages of perineal tear or in low-income countries. The aim of our study was to describe complications after primary OASI repair following a vaginal delivery in all French maternity wards at short and midterm and to assess factors associated with complication occurrence. We conducted a historical cohort study using the French nationwide claim database (PMSI) from January 2013 to December 2021. All women who sustained an OASI repair following a vaginal delivery were included and virtually followed-up for 2 years. Then, we searched for OASIS complications. Finally, we evaluated factors associated with OASIS complication repaired or not and OASIS complication repairs. Among the 61,833 included women, 2015 (2.8%) had an OASI complication and 842 (1.16%) underwent an OASI complication repair. Women were mainly primiparous (71.6%) and 44.3% underwent an instrumental delivery. During a follow-up of 2 years, 0.6% (n = 463), 0.3% (n = 240), 0.2% (n = 176), 0.1% (n = 84), 0.06% (n = 43) and 0.01% (n = 5) of patients underwent second surgery for a perineal repair, a fistula repair, a sphincteroplasty, a perineal infection, a colostomy and a sacral nervous anal stimulation, respectively. Only one case of artificial anal sphincter was noticed. Instrumental deliveries (OR = 1.56 CI95%[1.29;1.9]), private for-profit hospitals (OR = 1.42 [1.11;1.82], reference group "public hospital"), obesity (OR = 1.36 [1;1.84]), stage IV OASIS (OR = 2.98 [2.4;3.72]), perineal wound breakdown (OR = 2.8 [1.4;5.48]), ages between 25 and 29 years old (OR = 1.59 [1.17;2.18], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") and 30 and 34 years old (OR = 1.57 [1.14; 2.16], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") were factors associated with OASIS complication repairs. Maternal age, stage IV OASIS, obesity, instrumental deliveries and private for-profit hospitals seemed to predict OASIS complications. Understanding factors associated with OASIS complications could be beneficial for the patient to inform them and to influence the patient's follow-up in order to prevent complications, repairs and maternal distress.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Incidence of complications following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASI) during vaginal delivery are poorly defined. They are only studied in high level maternities, small cohorts, all stages of perineal tear or in low-income countries. The aim of our study was to describe complications after primary OASI repair following a vaginal delivery in all French maternity wards at short and midterm and to assess factors associated with complication occurrence.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a historical cohort study using the French nationwide claim database (PMSI) from January 2013 to December 2021. All women who sustained an OASI repair following a vaginal delivery were included and virtually followed-up for 2 years. Then, we searched for OASIS complications. Finally, we evaluated factors associated with OASIS complication repaired or not and OASIS complication repairs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 61,833 included women, 2015 (2.8%) had an OASI complication and 842 (1.16%) underwent an OASI complication repair. Women were mainly primiparous (71.6%) and 44.3% underwent an instrumental delivery. During a follow-up of 2 years, 0.6% (n = 463), 0.3% (n = 240), 0.2% (n = 176), 0.1% (n = 84), 0.06% (n = 43) and 0.01% (n = 5) of patients underwent second surgery for a perineal repair, a fistula repair, a sphincteroplasty, a perineal infection, a colostomy and a sacral nervous anal stimulation, respectively. Only one case of artificial anal sphincter was noticed. Instrumental deliveries (OR = 1.56 CI95%[1.29;1.9]), private for-profit hospitals (OR = 1.42 [1.11;1.82], reference group "public hospital"), obesity (OR = 1.36 [1;1.84]), stage IV OASIS (OR = 2.98 [2.4;3.72]), perineal wound breakdown (OR = 2.8 [1.4;5.48]), ages between 25 and 29 years old (OR = 1.59 [1.17;2.18], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") and 30 and 34 years old (OR = 1.57 [1.14; 2.16], refence group "age between 13 and 24 years old") were factors associated with OASIS complication repairs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Maternal age, stage IV OASIS, obesity, instrumental deliveries and private for-profit hospitals seemed to predict OASIS complications. Understanding factors associated with OASIS complications could be beneficial for the patient to inform them and to influence the patient's follow-up in order to prevent complications, repairs and maternal distress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39143527
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06691-w
pii: 10.1186/s12884-024-06691-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
539Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Thubert T, Cardaillac C, Fritel X, Winer N, Dochez V. Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46:913–21.
pubmed: 30385355
Stock L, Basham E, Gossett DR, Lewicky-Gaupp C. Factors associated with wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:327.e1-327.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.025 .
Goldaber KG, Wendel PJ, McIntire DD, Wendel GD. Postpartum perineal morbidity after fourth-degree perineal repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:489–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90478-2 .
doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90478-2
pubmed: 8438915
Lewicky-Gaupp C, Leader-Cramer A, Johnson LL, Kenton K, Gossett DR. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1088–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000833 .
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000833
pubmed: 25932836
Saclarides TJ. Rectovaginal fistula. Surg Clin North Am. 2002;82:1261–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00055-5 .
doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00055-5
pubmed: 12516853
Okeahialam NA, Wong KW, Thakar R, Sultan AH. The incidence of wound complications following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227:182–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.012
pubmed: 35550375
Gommesen D, Nohr EA, Drue HC, Qvist N, Rasch V. Obstetric perineal tears: risk factors, wound infection and dehiscence: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05165-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05165-1
pubmed: 31004221
Johnson A, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal wound infection: is there underreporting? Br J Nurs Mark Allen Publ. 2012;21(30):S28, S30, S32–35. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup5.S28 .
doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup5.S28
Goh JTW, Natukunda H, Singasi I, Kabugho E, Browning A, Krause HG. Surgical repair and follow-up of chronic 4th degree obstetric perineal tear (total perineal defect) in 2 centres in eastern Africa. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32:2437–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04841-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04841-8
pubmed: 34003311
pmcid: 8129957
Roper JC, Thakar R, Hurt KJ, Sultan AH. Diagnosis, management and training in perineal trauma: a UK national survey of obstetricians. Int Urogynecology J. 2023;34:2873–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-023-05590-6 .
Ismail SIMF. The management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): A national postal questionnaire survey in hospitals in the UK. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35:229–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2014.954098 .
Williams MK, Chames MC. Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:755–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.085
pubmed: 16949409
Maheu-Giroux M, Filippi V, Maulet N, Samadoulougou S, Castro MC, Meda N, et al. Risk factors for vaginal fistula symptoms in Sub-Saharan Africa: a pooled analysis of national household survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0871-6 .
Nichols CM, Lamb EH, Ramakrishnan V. Differences in outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree perineal laceration repair: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:530–4; discussion 534–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.045 .
Puissegur A, Accoceberry M, Rouzaire M, Pereira B, Herault M, Bruhat C, et al. Risk factors for Perineal Wound Breakdown in Early Postpartum: a retrospective case–control study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:3036. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12083036 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm12083036
pubmed: 37109371
pmcid: 10146046
Sjøveian S, Vangen S, Mukwege D, Onsrud M. Surgical outcome of obstetric fistula: a retrospective analysis of 595 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:753–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01162.x .
Turel FD, Langer S, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Medium- to Long-term Follow-up of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62:348–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001297 .
Viannay P, de la Codre F, Brochard C, Thubert T, Meurette G, Legendre G, et al. Management and consequences of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Rev J Visc Surg. 2021;158:231–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.10.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.10.010
Études. nécessitant l’accès aux données du PMSI et/ou des RPU par les établissements de santé et les fédérations hospitalières Méthodologie de référence MR-005 | CNIL n.d. https://www.cnil.fr/fr/declaration/mr-005-etudes-necessitant-lacces-aux-donnees-du-pmsi-etou-des-rpu-par-les-etablissements (accessed June 3, 2023).
Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, Johnson EL, Wright TG, Robson MC, et al. Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes. 2014;2014:638936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/638936 .
doi: 10.1155/2014/638936
pubmed: 24701367
pmcid: 3950544
Ye J. Adipose tissue vascularization: its role in chronic inflammation. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:203–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-011-0183-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0183-1
pubmed: 21327583
Oh D, Wright C, Young CJ. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injury: colorectal surgeons’ perspectives in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;61:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13261 .
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13261
pubmed: 33058142