Cognition and Return to Work Status 2 Years After Breast Cancer Diagnosis.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2024
Historique:
medline: 19 8 2024
pubmed: 19 8 2024
entrez: 19 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Return to work after breast cancer (BC) treatment depends on several factors, including treatment-related adverse effects. While cancer-related cognitive impairment is frequently reported by patients with BC, to date, no longitudinal studies have assessed its association with return to work. To examine whether cognition, assessed using objective and subjective scores, was associated with return to work 2 years after BC diagnosis. In a case series of the French Cancer Toxicities (CANTO) cohort, a study of patients with stage I to III BC investigated cognition from April 2014 to December 2018 (2 years' follow-up). Participants included women aged 58 years or younger at BC diagnosis who were employed or looking for a job. The outcome was return to work assessed 2 years after BC diagnosis. Objective cognitive functioning (tests), cognitive symptoms, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were prospectively assessed at diagnosis (baseline), 1 year after treatment completion, and 2 years after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explain return to work status at year 2 according to each cognitive measure separately, adjusted for age, occupational class, stage at diagnosis, and chemotherapy. The final sample included 178 women with BC (median age: 48.7 [range, 28-58] years), including 37 (20.8%) who did not return to work at year 2. Patients who returned to work had a higher (ie, professional) occupational class and were less likely to have had a mastectomy (24.1% vs 54.1%; P < .001). Return to work at year 2 was associated with lower overall cognitive impairment (1-point unit of increased odds ratio [1-pt OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P = .01), higher working memory (1-pt OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.59; P = .008), higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.36; P = .01) and higher attention performance (1-pt OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.64; P = .04), higher perceived cognitive abilities (1-pt OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21; P = .007), and lower depression (1-pt OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P = .001) at year 2 assessment. Return to work at year 2 was associated with several measures assessed at baseline and year 1: higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.37-4.31; P = .003 and 1.95; 95% CI, 1.14-3.50; P = .02), higher executive performance (1-pt OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.28-5.75; P = .01, and 2.88; 95% CI, 1.36-6.28; P = .006), and lower physical fatigue (10-pt OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .009 and 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02). In this case series study of patients with BC, return to work 2 years after diagnosis was associated with higher cognitive speed performance before and after BC treatment. Cognitive difficulties should be assessed before return to work to propose suitable management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39158915
pii: 2822402
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27576
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2427576

Auteurs

Marie Lange (M)

ANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.

Justine Lequesne (J)

ANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.

Agnes Dumas (A)

Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), Marseille, France.

Bénédicte Clin (B)

ANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
CHU de Caen, Service de santé au travail et pathologie professionnelle, F-14000 Caen, France.

Ines Vaz-Luis (I)

INSERM, Gustave Roussy Institute, University Paris Saclay, Unit Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Villejuif, France.

Barbara Pistilli (B)

Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Olivier Rigal (O)

Care Support Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Medical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.

Christelle Lévy (C)

Institut Normand du Sein, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Florence Lerebours (F)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France.

Anne-Laure Martin (AL)

UNICANCER, Paris, France.

Sibille Everhard (S)

UNICANCER, Paris, France.

Gwenn Menvielle (G)

INSERM, Gustave Roussy Institute, University Paris Saclay, Unit Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Villejuif, France.

Florence Joly (F)

ANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Services Unit PLATON, Cancer and Cognition Platform, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France.
Medical Oncology Department, CHU de Caen, Caen, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH