Is public transport a promising strategy for increasing physical activity? Evidence from a study of objectively measured public transport use and physical activity.
Behaviour
Commuting
Exercise
Public health
Translational medical research
Transportation
Journal
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Aug 2024
19 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
25
03
2024
accepted:
23
07
2024
medline:
20
8
2024
pubmed:
20
8
2024
entrez:
19
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Greater public transport use has been linked to higher physical activity levels. However, neither the amount of physical activity associated with each daily public transport trip performed, nor the potential total physical activity gain associated with an increase in trips/day, has been determined. Using objective measures, we aimed to quantify the association between public transport use, physical activity and sedentary time. A longitudinal study of Australian adults living in Hobart, Tasmania, who were infrequent bus users (≥ 18 years; used bus ≤ 2 times/week). The number of bus trips performed each day was determined from objective smartcard data provided by the public transportation (bus) provider across a 36-week study timeframe. Accelerometer measured steps/day (primary outcome), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (min/day), and sedentary time (min/day) were assessed across four separate one-week periods. Among 73 participants across 1483 day-level observations, on days that public transport was used, participants achieved significantly more steps (β = 2147.48; 95%CI = 1465.94, 2829.03), moderate to vigorous physical activity (β = 22.79; 95% CI = 14.33, 31.26), and sedentary time (β = 37.00; 95% CI = 19.80, 54.21) compared to days where no public transport trips were made. The largest increase in steps per day associated with a one-trip increase was observed when the number of trips performed each day increased from zero to one (β = 1761.63; 95%CI = 821.38, 2701.87). The increase in the number of steps per day was smaller and non-significant when the number of trips performed increased from one to two (β = 596.93; 95%CI=-585.16, 1779.01), and two to three or more (β = 632.39; 95%CI=-1331.45, 2596.24) trips per day. Significant increases in sedentary time were observed when the number of trips performed increased from zero to one (β = 39.38; 95%CI = 14.38, 64.39) and one to two (β = 48.76; 95%CI = 25.39, 72.12); but not when bus trips increased from two to three or more (β=-27.81; 95%CI=-76.00, 20.37). Greater public transport use was associated with higher physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Bus use may yield cumulative increases in steps that amount to 15-30% of the daily recommended physical activity target. A policy and public health focus on intersectoral action to promote public transport may yield meaningful increases in physical activity and subsequent health benefits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Greater public transport use has been linked to higher physical activity levels. However, neither the amount of physical activity associated with each daily public transport trip performed, nor the potential total physical activity gain associated with an increase in trips/day, has been determined. Using objective measures, we aimed to quantify the association between public transport use, physical activity and sedentary time.
METHODS
METHODS
A longitudinal study of Australian adults living in Hobart, Tasmania, who were infrequent bus users (≥ 18 years; used bus ≤ 2 times/week). The number of bus trips performed each day was determined from objective smartcard data provided by the public transportation (bus) provider across a 36-week study timeframe. Accelerometer measured steps/day (primary outcome), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (min/day), and sedentary time (min/day) were assessed across four separate one-week periods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 73 participants across 1483 day-level observations, on days that public transport was used, participants achieved significantly more steps (β = 2147.48; 95%CI = 1465.94, 2829.03), moderate to vigorous physical activity (β = 22.79; 95% CI = 14.33, 31.26), and sedentary time (β = 37.00; 95% CI = 19.80, 54.21) compared to days where no public transport trips were made. The largest increase in steps per day associated with a one-trip increase was observed when the number of trips performed each day increased from zero to one (β = 1761.63; 95%CI = 821.38, 2701.87). The increase in the number of steps per day was smaller and non-significant when the number of trips performed increased from one to two (β = 596.93; 95%CI=-585.16, 1779.01), and two to three or more (β = 632.39; 95%CI=-1331.45, 2596.24) trips per day. Significant increases in sedentary time were observed when the number of trips performed increased from zero to one (β = 39.38; 95%CI = 14.38, 64.39) and one to two (β = 48.76; 95%CI = 25.39, 72.12); but not when bus trips increased from two to three or more (β=-27.81; 95%CI=-76.00, 20.37).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Greater public transport use was associated with higher physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Bus use may yield cumulative increases in steps that amount to 15-30% of the daily recommended physical activity target. A policy and public health focus on intersectoral action to promote public transport may yield meaningful increases in physical activity and subsequent health benefits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39160546
doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01633-3
pii: 10.1186/s12966-024-01633-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
91Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 1152999
Organisme : National Heart Foundation of Australia
ID : 100444
Organisme : Metro Tasmania Pty. Ltd.
ID : Metro Tasmania Pty. Ltd.
Organisme : Local Government Association of Tasmania
ID : Local Government Association of Tasmania
Organisme : Tasmanian Department of Health Services
ID : Tasmanian Department of Health Services
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
pubmed: 33239350
Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, Van Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1311–24.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30383-X
pubmed: 27475266
Australian Department of Health. Australia’s physical activity and sedentary Behaviour guidelines for adults (18–64 years). Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014.
World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
Rissel C, Curac N, Greenaway M, Bauman A. Physical activity associated with public transport use: a review and modelling of potential benefits. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2012;9(7):2454–78.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072454
Bus Association Victoria. Public transport use a ticket to health. Melbourne, Australia: Bus Association Victoria; 2010.
Besser L, Dannenberg A. Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(4):273–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.010
pubmed: 16242589
Bista S, Debache I, Chaix B. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour related to transport activity assessed with multiple body-worn accelerometers: the RECORD MultiSensor Study. Public Health. 2020;189:144–52.
doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.009
pubmed: 33242758
Chaix B, Kestens Y, Duncan S, Merrien C, Thierry B, Pannier B, et al. Active transportation and public transportation use to achieve physical activity recommendations? A combined GPS, accelerometer, and mobility survey study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2014;11(1):124.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0124-x
Herreros-Irarrázabal D, Guzmán-Habinger J, Mahecha Matsudo S, Kovalskys I, Gómez G, Rigotti A, et al. Association between active transportation and public transport with an objectively measured meeting of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily steps guidelines in adults by sex from eight latin American countries. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2021;18(21):11553.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111553
Knell G, Durand CP, Shuval K, Kohl IIIHW, Salvo D, Sener IN, et al. Transit use and physical activity: findings from the Houston travel-related activity in neighborhoods (TRAIN) study. Prev Med Rep. 2018;9:55–61.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.12.012
pubmed: 29340271
Hajna S, White T, Panter J, Brage S, Wijndaele K, Woodcock J, et al. Driving status, travel modes and accelerometer-assessed physical activity in younger, middle-aged and older adults: a prospective study of 90 810 UK Biobank participants. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(4):1175–86.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz065
pubmed: 31004155
pmcid: 6693808
Sharman MJ, Ball K, Greaves S, Jose KA, Morse M, Blizzard CL, et al. trips4health: protocol of a single-blinded randomised controlled trial incentivising adults to use public transport for physical activity gain. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;19:100619.
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100619
pubmed: 32775761
pmcid: 7394862
Evans JT, Stanesby O, Blizzard L, Jose K, Sharman MJ, Ball K, et al. trips4health: a single-blinded randomised controlled trial incentivising adult public transport use for physical activity gain. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2023;20(1):98.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01500-7
Sharman M, Ball K, Greaves S, Jose K, Morse M, Blizzard L, et al. trips4health: protocol of a single-blinded randomised controlled trial incentivising adults to use public transport for physical activity gain. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020;19:100619.
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100619
pubmed: 32775761
pmcid: 7394862
Stanesby O, Greaves S, Jose K, Sharman M, Blizzard L, Palmer AJ, et al. A prospective study of the impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on activities and mobility upon physical activity, travel behaviour and attitudes. J Transp Health. 2023;31:101624.
doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101624
pubmed: 37228262
pmcid: 10196155
Jose KA, Sharman MJ, Stanesby O, Greaves S, Venn AJ, Blizzard L, et al. Incentivising public transport use for physical activity gain: process evaluation of the COVID-19 disrupted trips4health randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2022;19(1):157.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01394-x
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Regional population: 2021–2022. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2023.
Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2).
Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Bassett DR. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(8):1376–81.
doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00021
pubmed: 12165695
Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11).
Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5).
Census of Population and Housing. 2021 TableBuilder [Internet]. Commonwealth of Australia. 2021 [cited 11/01/2024]. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/microdata-tablebuilder/tablebuilder .
Laverty AA, Webb E, Vamos EP, Millett C. Associations of increases in public transport use with physical activity and adiposity in older adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2018;15(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0660-x
Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough? Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1–8.
doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434010-00001
pubmed: 14715035
Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Ballin M, Bassett DR, Buford TW, Carnethon MR, et al. Prospective association of daily steps with cardiovascular disease: a harmonized meta-analysis. Circulation. 2023;147(2):122–31.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061288
pubmed: 36537288
Del Pozo Cruz B, Ahmadi MN, Lee IM, Stamatakis E. Prospective associations of daily step counts and intensity with cancer and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182(11):1139.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.4000
pubmed: 36094529
pmcid: 9468953
Teylan M, Kantorowski A, Homsy D, Kadri R, Richardson C, Moy M. Physical activity in COPD: minimal clinically important difference for medical events. Chronic Resp Dis. 2019;16:1479973118816424.
Demeyer H, Burtin C, Hornikx M, Camillo CA, Van Remoortel H, Langer D, et al. The minimal important difference in physical activity in patients with COPD. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0154587.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154587
pubmed: 27124297
pmcid: 4849755
Motl RW, Pilutti LA, Learmonth YC, Goldman MD, Brown T. Clinical importance of steps taken per day among persons with multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73247.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073247
pubmed: 24023843
pmcid: 3762863
Maddison R, Jiang Y, Foley L, Scragg R, Direito A, Olds T. The association between the activity profile and cardiovascular risk. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(8):605–10.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.08.001
pubmed: 26320386
Länsitie M, Kangas M, Jokelainen J, Venojärvi M, Timonen M, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk and all-cause mortality associated with accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time – a prospective population-based study in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):729.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03414-8
pubmed: 36064345
pmcid: 9446693
Ulf E, Jakob T, Jostein S-J, Bjørge HH, Barbara J, Morten WF, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4570.
Liao Y, Gil J, Pereira RHM, Yeh S, Verendel V. Disparities in travel times between car and transit: spatiotemporal patterns in cities. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4056.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61077-0
pubmed: 32132647
pmcid: 7055332
Tasmanian Government. Greater Hobart household travel survey summary. In: Department of State Growth, editor.; 2019.
Goulet-Langlois G, Koutsopoulos HN, Zhao J. Inferring patterns in the multi-week activity sequences of public transport users. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 2016;64:1–16.
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.012
Mutz DC, Roberts DF, Vuuren DPv. Reconsidering the displacement hypothesis: Television’s influence on children’s time use. Communication Res. 1993;20(1):51–75.
doi: 10.1177/009365093020001003
Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr. 2014;1:5.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2014.00005
pubmed: 25988109
pmcid: 4428382
Lee JA, Williams SM, Brown DD, Laurson KR. Concurrent validation of the actigraph gt3x+, Polar active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(10):991–1000.
doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981848
pubmed: 25517396
Bagchi M, White PR. The potential of public transport smart card data. Transp Policy. 2005;12(5):464–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.06.008