Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis Predicts Biventricular Dysfunction and Dilation in Congenital Heart Disease.
Humans
Deep Learning
Electrocardiography
/ methods
Female
Male
Heart Defects, Congenital
/ physiopathology
Adult
Adolescent
Young Adult
Child
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ physiopathology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
/ physiopathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
/ methods
Child, Preschool
Predictive Value of Tests
artificial intelligence
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
congenital heart disease
tetralogy of Fallot
ventricular function
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
ISSN: 1558-3597
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8301365
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Aug 2024
27 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
revised:
23
04
2024
accepted:
20
05
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) analysis shows promise to detect biventricular pathophysiology. However, AI-ECG analysis remains underexplored in congenital heart disease (CHD). The purpose of this study was to develop and externally validate an AI-ECG model to predict cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-defined biventricular dysfunction/dilation in patients with CHD. We trained (80%) and tested (20%) a convolutional neural network on paired ECG-CMRs (≤30 days apart) from patients with and without CHD to detect left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%), RV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%), and LV and RV dilation (end-diastolic volume z-score ≥4). Performance was assessed during internal testing and external validation on an outside health care system using area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and area under precision recall curve. The internal and external cohorts comprised 8,584 ECG-CMR pairs (n = 4,941; median CMR age 20.7 years) and 909 ECG-CMR pairs (n = 746; median CMR age 25.4 years), respectively. Model performance was similar for internal testing (AUROC: LV dysfunction 0.87; LV dilation 0.86; RV dysfunction 0.88; RV dilation 0.81) and external validation (AUROC: LV dysfunction 0.89; LV dilation 0.83; RV dysfunction 0.82; RV dilation 0.80). Model performance was lowest in functionally single ventricle patients. Tetralogy of Fallot patients predicted to be at high risk of ventricular dysfunction had lower survival (P < 0.001). Model explainability via saliency mapping revealed that lateral precordial leads influence all outcome predictions, with high-risk features including QRS widening and T-wave inversions for RV dysfunction/dilation. AI-ECG shows promise to predict biventricular dysfunction/dilation, which may help inform CMR timing in CHD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) analysis shows promise to detect biventricular pathophysiology. However, AI-ECG analysis remains underexplored in congenital heart disease (CHD).
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to develop and externally validate an AI-ECG model to predict cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-defined biventricular dysfunction/dilation in patients with CHD.
METHODS
METHODS
We trained (80%) and tested (20%) a convolutional neural network on paired ECG-CMRs (≤30 days apart) from patients with and without CHD to detect left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%), RV dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%), and LV and RV dilation (end-diastolic volume z-score ≥4). Performance was assessed during internal testing and external validation on an outside health care system using area under receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and area under precision recall curve.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The internal and external cohorts comprised 8,584 ECG-CMR pairs (n = 4,941; median CMR age 20.7 years) and 909 ECG-CMR pairs (n = 746; median CMR age 25.4 years), respectively. Model performance was similar for internal testing (AUROC: LV dysfunction 0.87; LV dilation 0.86; RV dysfunction 0.88; RV dilation 0.81) and external validation (AUROC: LV dysfunction 0.89; LV dilation 0.83; RV dysfunction 0.82; RV dilation 0.80). Model performance was lowest in functionally single ventricle patients. Tetralogy of Fallot patients predicted to be at high risk of ventricular dysfunction had lower survival (P < 0.001). Model explainability via saliency mapping revealed that lateral precordial leads influence all outcome predictions, with high-risk features including QRS widening and T-wave inversions for RV dysfunction/dilation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
AI-ECG shows promise to predict biventricular dysfunction/dilation, which may help inform CMR timing in CHD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39168568
pii: S0735-1097(24)07676-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.062
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
815-828Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported in part by the Thrasher Research Fund Early Career Award (Dr Mayourian), National Institutes of Health T32 Research Methods in Pediatric Cardiovascular Disease Award Number: 5T32HL007572-38 (Dr Gearhart), and National Institutes of Health grant R00-LM012926 (Prof La Cava). Dr Nadkarni has consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, BioVie, GLG Consulting, Pensieve Health, Reata, Renalytix, Siemens Healthineers, and Variant Bio; has received research funding from Goldfinch Bio and Renalytix; has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, BioVie, Lexicon, Daiichi-Sankyo, Menarini Health, and Reata; has patents or royalties with Renalytix; owns equity and stock options in Pensieve Health and Renalytix as a scientific cofounder; owns equity in Verici Dx; has received financial compensation as a scientific board member and advisor to Renalytix; serves on the advisory board of Neurona Health; and serves in an advisory or leadership role for Pensieve Health and Renalytix; none of these relationships played a role in the design or conduct of this study. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.