Interference haptic stimulation and consistent quantitative tactility in transparent electrotactile screen with pressure-sensitive transistors.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Aug 2024
21 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
23
03
2024
accepted:
07
08
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Integrating tactile feedback through haptic interfaces enhances experiences in virtual and augmented reality. However, electrotactile systems, which stimulate mechanoreceptors directly, often yield inconsistent tactile results due to variations in pressure between the device and the finger. In this study, we present the integration of a transparent electrotactile screen with pressure-sensitive transistors, ensuring highly consistent quantitative haptic sensations. These transistors effectively calibrate tactile variations caused by touch pressure. Additionally, we explore remote-distance tactile stimulations achieved through the interference of electromagnetic waves. We validated tactile perception using somatosensory evoked potentials, monitoring the somatosensory cortex response. Our haptic screen can stimulate diverse electrotactile sensations and demonstrate various tactile patterns, including Morse code and Braille, when integrated with portable smart devices, delivering a more immersive experience. Furthermore, interference of electric fields allows haptic stimulation to facilitate diverse stimulus positioning at lower current densities, extending the reach beyond direct contact with electrodes of our screen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39168999
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51593-2
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-51593-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7147Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Lee, W. W. et al. A neuro-inspired artificial peripheral nervous system for scalable electronic skins. Sci. Robot 4, eaax2198 (2019).
pubmed: 33137772
Sundaram, S. et al. Learning the signatures of the human grasp using a scalable tactile glove. Nature 569, 698–702 (2019).
pubmed: 31142856
Shim, H. et al. Stretchable elastic synaptic transistors for neurologically integrated soft engineering systems. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax4961 (2019).
pubmed: 31646177
pmcid: 6788872
Song, J.-K. et al. Wearable Force Touch Sensor Array Using a Flexible and Transparent Electrode. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1605286 (2017).
Shi, Y. et al. Eye tracking and eye expression decoding based on transparent, flexible and ultra-persistent electrostatic interface. Nat. Commun. 14, 3315 (2023).
pubmed: 37286541
pmcid: 10247702
Song, Y. M. Artificial vision systems inspired by the eyes of aquatic animals. CLEO:Applications and Technology (Optica Publishing Group) (2023)
Yao, H. et al. Augmented Reality Interfaces Using Virtual Customization of Microstructured Electronic Skin Sensor Sensitivity Performances. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008650 (2021).
Larson, C. et al. Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing. Science 351, 1071–1074 (2016).
pubmed: 26941316
Bai, N. et al. Graded intrafillable architecture-based iontronic pressure sensor with ultra-broad-range high sensitivity. Nat. Commun. 11, 209 (2020).
pubmed: 31924813
pmcid: 6954251
Kim, K. K. et al. A substrate-less nanomesh receptor with meta-learning for rapid hand task recognition. Nat. Electron. 6, 64–75 (2023).
Weber, A. I. et al. Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures. PNAS 110, 17107–17112 (2013).
pubmed: 24082087
pmcid: 3800989
Jung, Y. H. et al. A wireless haptic interface for programmable patterns of touch across large areas of the skin. Nat. Electron. 5, 374–385 (2022).
Ershad, F., Patel, S. & Yu, C. Wearable bioelectronics fabricated in situ on skins. npj Flex. Electron 7, 32 (2023).
Berkelman, P. J. & Hollis, R. L. Lorentz Magnetic Levitation for Haptic Interaction: Device Design, Performance, and Integration with Physical Simulations. Int. J. Robot. Res. 19, 644–667 (2000).
Fang, C., Zhang, Y., Dworman, M. & Harrison, C. Wireality: Enabling Complex Tangible Geometries in Virtual Reality with Worn Multi-String Haptics. in Proc. of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–10 (2020)
Zhang, J. et al. Stretchable Transparent Electrode Arrays for Simultaneous Electrical and Optical Interrogation of Neural Circuits in Vivo. Nano Lett. 18, 2903–2911 (2018).
pubmed: 29608857
Shi, Y. et al. Self-powered electro-tactile system for virtual tactile experiences. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe2943 (2021).
pubmed: 33536215
pmcid: 7857682
Lin, W. et al. Super-resolution wearable electrotactile rendering system. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp8738 (2022).
pubmed: 36083898
pmcid: 9462686
Kajimoto H., Kawakami N., Maeda T., & Tachi S. Electro-Tactile Display with Tactile Primary Color Approach. Graduate School of Information and Technology (The University of Tokyo), (2004).
Kajimoto, H. Skeletouch: transparent electro-tactile display for mobile surfaces. SA’12: SIGGRAPH Asia 2012 Emerging Technologies 1–3 (2012).
Catrysse, P. B. & Fan, S. Nanopatterned Metallic Films for Use As Transparent Conductive Electrodes in Optoelectronic Devices. Nano Lett. 10, 2944–2949 (2010).
pubmed: 20698607
Birgersson, U., Birgersson, E. & Ollmar, S. Estimating electrical properties and the thickness of skin with electrical impedance spectroscopy: Mathematical analysis and measurements. J. Electr. Bioimpedance. 3, 51–60 (2012).
Benali-Khoudja, M., Hafez, M., Alexandre, J. & Kheddar, A. Tactile interfaces: a state-of-the-art survey. Int. Symp .Robot. 31, 23–26 (2004).
Matia, Y. et al. Harnessing nonuniform pressure distributions in soft robotic actuators. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200330 (2023).
Taji, B., Chan, A. D. C. & Shirmohammadi, S. Effect of pressure on skin-electrode impedance in wearable biomedical measurement devices. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 67, 1900–1912 (2018).
Yuk, H., Lu, B. & Zhao, X. Hydrogel bioelectronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1642–1667 (2019).
pubmed: 30474663
Akhtar, A., Sombeck, J., Boyce, B. & Bretl, T. Controlling sensation intensity for electrotactile stimulation in human-machine interfaces. Sci. Robot. 3, eaap9770 (2018).
pubmed: 31342002
pmcid: 6656406
Kourtesis, P., Argelaguet, F., Vizcay, S., Marchal, M. & Pacchierotti, C. Electrotactile feedback applications for hand and arm interactions: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and future directions. IEEE Trans. Haptics. 15, 479–496 (2022).
pubmed: 35816531
Mirzakhalili, E., Barra, B., Capogrosso, M. & Lempka, S. F. Biophysics of temporal interference stimulation. Cell Syst. 11, 557–572.e5 (2020).
pubmed: 33157010
Grossman, N. et al. Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields. Cell 169, 1029–1041.e16 (2017).
pubmed: 28575667
pmcid: 5520675
Choi, K., Kim, P., Kim, K.-S. & Kim, S. Two-channel electrotactile stimulation for sensory feedback of fingers of prosthesis. 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 1133–1138 (2016).
Malešević, J. et al. Electrotactile Communication via Matrix Electrode Placed on the Torso Using Fast Calibration, and Static vs. Dynamic Encoding. Sensors 22, 7658 (2022).
pubmed: 36236758
pmcid: 9572222
Gellis, M. & Pool, R. Two-point discrimination distances in the normal hand and forearm: application to various methods of fingertip reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 59, 57–63 (1977).
pubmed: 318754
Nolan, M. F. Two-Point Discrimination Assessment in the Upper Limb in Young Adult Men and Women. Phys. Ther. 62, 965–969 (1982).
pubmed: 7089059
Moon, S.-H. et al. Electrically stimulable indium tin oxide plate for long-term in vitro cardiomyocyte culture. Biomater. Res 24, 10 (2020).
pubmed: 32514370
pmcid: 7251917
Gehrke, H. et al. Platinum nanoparticles and their cellular uptake and DNA platination at non-cytotoxic concentrations. Arch. Toxicol. 85, 799–812 (2011).
pubmed: 21229235
Hsu, N.-S. et al. Oxi-redox selective breast cancer treatment: an in vitro study of theranostic in-based oxide nanoparticles for controlled generation or prevention of oxidative stress. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 13, 2204–2217 (2021).
Hwang, J. C. et al. In situ diagnosis and simultaneous treatment of cardiac diseases using a single-device platform. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq0897 (2022).
pubmed: 36103536
pmcid: 9473581
R. S. Dahiya, M. Valle. Robotic Tactile Sensing: Technologies and System Ch. 5 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013).
Zang, Y., Zhang, F., Di, C. & Zhu, D. Advances of flexible pressure sensors toward artificial intelligence and health care applications. Mater. Horiz. 2, 140–156 (2015).
Torres, G., Cinelli, M. P., Hynes, A. T., Kaplan, I. S. & Leheste, J. R. Electroencephalogram Mapping of Brain. S. J. Neurosci. Neuroeng. 3, 73–77 (2014).
Hayashi, K. & Ninjouji, T. Two-point discrimination threshold as a function of frequency and polarity at fingertip by electrical stimulation. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med Biol. Soc. 2004, 4256–4259 (2004).
pubmed: 17271244
Fine, E. J. & Ziad Darkhabani, M. History of the development of the neurological examination. Handbook of Clinical Neurology Ch.16 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2009).
Rowin, J. & Meriggioli, M. N. Textbook of Clinical Neurology Ch. 19 (Third Edition) (W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2007).
Ren, Z. et al. Fully Elastic and Metal-Free Tactile Sensors for Detecting both Normal and Tangential Forces Based on Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1802989 (2018).
Hutcheon, B. et al. Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends Neurosci. 23, 216–222 (2000).
pubmed: 10782127