Computational design and experimental confirmation of a disulfide-stapled YAP helix


Journal

Journal of computer-aided molecular design
ISSN: 1573-4951
Titre abrégé: J Comput Aided Mol Des
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8710425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 07 04 2024
accepted: 14 08 2024
medline: 23 8 2024
pubmed: 23 8 2024
entrez: 23 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Human Hippo signaling pathway is an evolutionarily conserved regulator network that controls organ development and has been implicated in various cancers. Transcriptional enhanced associate domain-4 (TEAD4) is the final nuclear effector of Hippo pathway, which is activated by Yes-associated protein (YAP) through binding to two separated YAP regions of α1-helix and Ω-loop. Previous efforts have all been addressed on deriving peptide inhibitors from the YAP to target TEAD4. Instead, we herein attempted to rationally design a so-called 'YAP helix

Identifiants

pubmed: 39177727
doi: 10.1007/s10822-024-00572-2
pii: 10.1007/s10822-024-00572-2
doi:

Substances chimiques

TEA Domain Transcription Factors 0
Transcription Factors 0
TEAD4 protein, human 0
DNA-Binding Proteins 0
Antineoplastic Agents 0
YAP1 protein, human 0
YAP-Signaling Proteins 0
Muscle Proteins 0
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing 0
Disulfides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

31

Subventions

Organisme : Jinggangshan University Startup Fund for Doctor Research
ID : JZB11035
Organisme : Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation
ID : 20202BABL206111
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
ID : 20202BABL206111

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Références

Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM (2013) The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 13:246–257
pubmed: 23467301 doi: 10.1038/nrc3458
Cunningham R, Hansen CG (2022) The Hippo pathway in cancer: YAP/TAZ and TEAD as therapeutic targets in cancer. Clin Sci 136:197–222
doi: 10.1042/CS20201474
Zhou Y, Huang T, Cheng AS, Yu J, Kang W, To KF (2016) The TEAD family and its oncogenic role in promoting tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci 17:138
pubmed: 26805820 pmcid: 4730377 doi: 10.3390/ijms17010138
Hong W, Guan KL (2012) The YAP and TAZ transcription co-activators: key downstream effectors of the mammalian Hippo pathway. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23:785–793
pubmed: 22659496 pmcid: 3459069 doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.05.004
Santucci M, Vignudelli T, Ferrari S, Mor M, Scalvini L, Bolognesi ML, Uliassi E, Costi MP (2015) The Hippo pathway and YAP/TAZ-TEAD protein–protein interaction as targets for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment. J Med Chem 58:4857–4873
pubmed: 25719868 doi: 10.1021/jm501615v
Luo M, Xu Y, Chen H, Wu Y, Pang A, Hu J, Dong X, Che J, Yang H (2022) Advances of targeting the YAP/TAZ-TEAD complex in the hippo pathway for the treatment of cancers. Eur J Med Chem 244:114847
pubmed: 36265280 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114847
Wang S, Ye H, Shang S, Li Z, Peng Y, Zhou P (2024) A structure-based data set of protein-peptide affinities and its nonredundant benchmark: potential applications in computational peptidology. Curr Med Chem 26:1–10
Mesrouze Y, Bokhovchuk F, Meyerhofer M, Fontana P, Zimmermann C, Martin T, Delaunay C, Erdmann D, Schmelzle T, Chène P (2017) Dissection of the interaction between the intrinsically disordered YAP protein and the transcription factor TEAD. Elife 6:e25068
pubmed: 28430104 pmcid: 5400505 doi: 10.7554/eLife.25068
Furet P, Salem B, Mesrouze Y, Schmelzle T, Lewis I, Kallen J, Chène P (2019) Structure-based design of potent linear peptide inhibitors of the YAP–TEAD protein–protein interaction derived from the YAP Ω-loop sequence. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 29:2316–2319
pubmed: 31235263 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.06.022
He B, Wu T, He P, Lv F, Liu H (2021) Structure-based derivation and optimization of YAP-like coactivator-derived peptides to selectively target TEAD family transcription factors by hydrocarbon stapling and cyclization. Chem Biol Drug Des 97:1129–1136
pubmed: 33283479 doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13813
Mesrouze Y, Gubler H, Villard F, Boesch R, Ottl J, Kallen J, Reid PC, Scheufler C, Marzinzik AL, Chène P (2023) Biochemical and structural characterization of a peptidic inhibitor of the YAP:TEAD interaction that binds to the α-helix pocket on TEAD. ACS Chem Biol 18:643–651
pubmed: 36825662 doi: 10.1021/acschembio.2c00936
Pobbati AV, Rubin BP (2020) Protein–protein interaction disruptors of the YAP/TAZ–TEAD transcriptional complex. Molecules 25:6001
pubmed: 33352993 pmcid: 7766469 doi: 10.3390/molecules25246001
Bai Z, Hou S, Zhang S, Li Z, Zhou P (2017) Targeting self-binding peptides as a novel strategy to regulate protein activity and function: a case study on the proto-oncogene tyrosine protein kinase c-Src. J Chem Inf Model 57:835–845
pubmed: 28345935 doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00673
Zhou P, Hou S, Bai Z, Li Z, Wang H, Chen Z, Meng Y (2018) Disrupting the intramolecular interaction between proto-oncogene c-Src SH3 domain and its self-binding peptide PPII with rationally designed peptide ligands. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46:1122–1131
pubmed: 28754059 doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1360327
Zhang D, He D, Pan X, Liu L (2020) Rational design and intramolecular cyclization of hotspot peptide segments at YAP–TEAD4 complex interface. Protein Pept Lett 27:999–1006
pubmed: 32286937 doi: 10.2174/0929866527666200414160723
Zhang D, Wu H, Zhao J (2021) Computational design and experimental substantiation of conformationally constrained peptides from the complex interfaces of transcriptional enhanced associate domains with their cofactors in gastric cancer. Comput Biol Chem 94:107569
pubmed: 34500324 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2021.107569
Gu H, Liu L (2021) Molecular modeling and rational design of noncovalent halogen∙∙∙oxygen∙∙∙hydrogen motif at the complex interface of EGFR kinase domain with RALT peptide. Chem Phys 550:111309
doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2021.111309
Zhang D, He D, Pan X, Xu Y, Liu L (2019) Structural analysis and rational design of orthogonal stacking system in an E. coli DegP PDZ1–peptide complex. Chem Pap 73:2469–2476
doi: 10.1007/s11696-019-00797-8
Mesrouze Y, Bokhovchuk F, Izaac A, Meyerhofer M, Zimmermann C, Fontana P, Schmelzle T, Erdmann D, Furet P, Kallen J, Chène P (2018) Adaptation of the bound intrinsically disordered protein YAP to mutations at the YAP:TEAD interface. Protein Sci 27:1810–1820
pubmed: 30058229 pmcid: 6199158 doi: 10.1002/pro.3493
Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL (2009) Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 77:778–795
pubmed: 19603484 pmcid: 2885146 doi: 10.1002/prot.22488
Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, Zhang W, Yang R, Cieplak P, Luo R, Lee T, Caldwell J, Wang J, Kollman P (2003) A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 24:1999–2012
pubmed: 14531054 doi: 10.1002/jcc.10349
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435–447
pubmed: 26620784 doi: 10.1021/ct700301q
Zhou P, Yan F, Miao Q, Chen Z, Wang H (2021) Why the first self-binding peptide of human c-Src kinase does not contain class II motif but can bind to its cognate Src homology 3 domain in class II mode? J Biomol Struct Dyn 39:310–318
pubmed: 31872783 doi: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1709547
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Ni J, Zhong Z, Lu W, Li S, Shao X, Hang L (2024) Systematic profiling of mitogen-inducible gene 6 and its derived peptides binding to receptor tyrosine kinases in bone cancers at molecular and cellular levels. Int J Pept Res Ther 30:8
doi: 10.1007/s10989-023-10585-4
Yang C, Zhang S, He P, Wang C, Huang J, Zhou P (2015) Self-binding peptides: folding or binding? J Chem Inf Model 55:329–342
pubmed: 25643174 doi: 10.1021/ci500522v
Yang C, Zhang S, Bai Z, Hou S, Wu D, Huang J, Zhou P (2016) A two-step binding mechanism for the self-binding peptide recognition of target domains. Mol Biosyst 12:1201–1213
pubmed: 26854254 doi: 10.1039/C5MB00800J
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle Mesh Ewald: an N∙Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089–10092
doi: 10.1063/1.464397
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije JGEM (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18:1463–1472
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H
Genheden S, Ryde U (2015) The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 10:449–461
pubmed: 25835573 pmcid: 4487606 doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
Chang CE, Chen W, Gilson MK (2005) Evaluating the accuracy of the Quasiharmonic approximation. J Chem Theory Comput 1:1017–1028
pubmed: 26641917 doi: 10.1021/ct0500904
Zhou P, Wen L, Lin J, Mei L, Liu Q, Shang S, Li J, Shu J (2022) Integrated unsupervised-supervised modeling and prediction of protein-peptide affinities at structural level. Brief Bioinform 23:bbac097
pubmed: 35352094 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac097
Li Z, Miao Q, Yan F, Meng Y, Zhou P (2019) Machine learning in quantitative protein-peptide affinity prediction: implications for therapeutic peptide design. Curr Drug Metab 20:170–176
pubmed: 30317994 doi: 10.2174/1389200219666181012151944
Lin J, Wen L, Zhou Y, Wang S, Ye H, Su J, Li J, Shu J, Huang J, Zhou P (2023) PepQSAR: a comprehensive data source and information platform for peptide quantitative structure-activity relationships. Amino Acids 55:235–242
pubmed: 36474016 doi: 10.1007/s00726-022-03219-4
Zhou P, Liu Q, Wu T, Miao Q, Shang S, Wang H, Chen Z, Wang S, Wang H (2021) Systematic comparison and comprehensive evaluation of 80 amino acid descriptors in peptide QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Model 61:1718–1731
pubmed: 33710894 doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01370
Zhu H, Xu S, Wu J, Hu J, Mao X (2022) Molecular design and rational optimization of synergistic effect between the two wings of a roughly orthogonal cation-π-π stacking system at nasopharyngeal carcinoma YAP1–TEAD4 parallel Helix-Helix interaction interface. J Mol Recognit 35:e2986
pubmed: 36326001 doi: 10.1002/jmr.2986
Greenfield NJ (2006) Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat Protoc 1:2876–2890
pubmed: 17406547 pmcid: 2728378 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.202
Yan T, Zhang Y, Liu L, Shi Z, Sun T, Yang J, Xue L, Shi X, Sha N (2023) Targeting peptide-mediated interaction between the N-protein and P-protein of human pediatric respiratory syncytial virus by molecular design of chemically stapled helical peptides. J Chin Chem Soc 70:1835–1846
doi: 10.1002/jccs.202300123
Chen YH, Yang JT, Chau KH (1974) Determination of the helix and beta form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism. Biochemistry 13:3350–3359
pubmed: 4366945 doi: 10.1021/bi00713a027
Brooks H, Lebleu B, Vivès E (2005) Tat peptide-mediated cellular delivery: back to basics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:559–577
pubmed: 15722164 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.001
Zhao L, Huang Q, Tian S, Ge J, Zhu H, Dong Q (2019) Integrative identification of unexpected kinase-inhibitor interactions in the MAPK-mediated proliferation and differentiation of Mc3T3-E1 osteoblasts. Gen Physiol Biophys 38:1–13
pubmed: 30657460 doi: 10.4149/gpb_2018030
Zhou P, Tian F, Shang Z (2009) 2D depiction of nonbonding interactions for protein complexes. J Comput Chem 30:940–951
pubmed: 18942722 doi: 10.1002/jcc.21109
UniProt C (2023) UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D523–D531
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1052
Wang J, Zhang J, Sun X, Liu C, Li X, Chen L (2019) Molecular design of sequence-minimized, structure-optimized, and hydrocarbon-stapled helix-helix interactions in the trimer-of-hairpins motif of pediatric pneumonia RSV-F protein. Chem Biol Drug Des 94:1292–1299
pubmed: 30776182 doi: 10.1111/cbdd.13501
Lin J, Wang S, Wen L, Ye H, Shang S, Li J, Shu J, Zhou P (2023) Targeting peptide-mediated interactions in omics. Proteomics 23:e2200175
pubmed: 36461811 doi: 10.1002/pmic.202200175
Shu J, Li J, Wang S, Lin J, Wen L, Ye H, Zhou P (2023) Systematic analysis and comparison of peptide specificity and selectivity between their cognate receptors and noncognate decoys. J Mol Recognit 36:e3006
pubmed: 36579779 doi: 10.1002/jmr.3006
Mei L, Shang S, Wang S, Ye H, Zhou P (2023) Machine annealing-guided navigation of antihypertensive food peptide selectivity between human ACE N- and C-domains in structurally interacting diversity space. J Mol Recognit 36:e3014
pubmed: 37014036 doi: 10.1002/jmr.3014
Yin F, Dong J, Kang LI, Liu X (2021) Hippo-YAP signaling in digestive system tumors. Am J Cancer Res 11:2495–2507
pubmed: 34249412 pmcid: 8263672
Wu D, Luo L, Yang Z, Chen Y, Quan Y, Min Z (2021) Targeting human hippo TEAD binding interface with YAP/TAZ-derived, flexibility-reduced peptides in gastric cancer. Int J Pept Res Ther 27:119–128
doi: 10.1007/s10989-020-10069-9
Chen F, Wang Q, Mu Y, Sun S, Yuan X, Shang P, Ji B (2022) Systematic profiling and identification of the peptide-mediated interactions between human Yes-associated protein and its partners in esophageal cancer. J Mol Recognit 35:e2947
pubmed: 34964176 doi: 10.1002/jmr.2947

Auteurs

Kaipeng Li (K)

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, No. 28, Xueyuan Road, Ji'an, 343009, China.

Lijun Liu (L)

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jinggangshan University, No. 28, Xueyuan Road, Ji'an, 343009, China. lij_liu@163.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH