Compromised informed consent due to functional health literacy challenges in Chinese hospitals.
China
Health communication
Health literacy
Informed consent
Medical ethics
Patient values
Journal
BMC medical ethics
ISSN: 1472-6939
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088680
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Aug 2024
23 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
20
08
2023
accepted:
05
08
2024
medline:
24
8
2024
pubmed:
24
8
2024
entrez:
23
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Medical informed consent stands as an ethical and legal requisite preceding any medical intervention. Hospitalized patients face functional health literacy (FHL) challenges when dealing with informed consent forms (ICFs). The legitimacy of ICFs and informed consent procedures in China remains substantially undisclosed. The study's aim was to investigate if Chinese patients have adequate FHL to be truly informed before providing medical consent. In this cross-sectional, structured interview-based study, FHL was assessed within the context of the informed consent scenarios in two teaching hospitals (a 1500-bed general tertiary hospital and a 700-bed cancer hospital) affiliated with Shantou University Medical College. Twenty-seven patients admitted across clinical departments, along with their relatives (n = 59), were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. The participants underwent a three-step assessment with two selected ICFs -teach-back skills, perceived understanding (perception), and informed knowledge (cognizance), with each component carrying a maximum score of 10. Data were analyzed with SPSS (version 22.0) for descriptive and inferential statistics, with consideration of significant P values as < 0.05. The median age (IQR and range) of participants was 35.5 (28 - 49 and 13 - 74) years. Most participants had only high school education (24.4%, 21/86) or below high school education (47.7%, 41/86). The median score (IQR) of FHL assessments-teach-back, perception, and cognizance-was 4.0 (2.5, 5.8), 8.0 (6.8, 8.8), and 6.5 (5.5, 8.0) out of 10, respectively. A moderate correlation was observed between the scores of cognizance and teach-back (r = 0.359, P = 0.002) or perception (r = 0.437, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis predicted being a patient and having lower education levels as independent risk factors of inadequate FHL (Ps = 0.001). Lack of patient-centeredness in ICFs, time constraints, and poor clinical communication were identified as barriers impeding informed consent. This study demonstrates inadequacy in personal FHL and impaired organizational HL, resulting in compromised informed consent in Chinese teaching hospitals. As a remedy, we propose improving the quality of ICFs and institutionally mandated outcome-focused training on informed consent for all concerned clinicians to enhance medical ethics, ensure quality health care, address patient values, and mitigate potential medical conflicts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Medical informed consent stands as an ethical and legal requisite preceding any medical intervention. Hospitalized patients face functional health literacy (FHL) challenges when dealing with informed consent forms (ICFs). The legitimacy of ICFs and informed consent procedures in China remains substantially undisclosed. The study's aim was to investigate if Chinese patients have adequate FHL to be truly informed before providing medical consent.
METHODS
METHODS
In this cross-sectional, structured interview-based study, FHL was assessed within the context of the informed consent scenarios in two teaching hospitals (a 1500-bed general tertiary hospital and a 700-bed cancer hospital) affiliated with Shantou University Medical College. Twenty-seven patients admitted across clinical departments, along with their relatives (n = 59), were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. The participants underwent a three-step assessment with two selected ICFs -teach-back skills, perceived understanding (perception), and informed knowledge (cognizance), with each component carrying a maximum score of 10. Data were analyzed with SPSS (version 22.0) for descriptive and inferential statistics, with consideration of significant P values as < 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median age (IQR and range) of participants was 35.5 (28 - 49 and 13 - 74) years. Most participants had only high school education (24.4%, 21/86) or below high school education (47.7%, 41/86). The median score (IQR) of FHL assessments-teach-back, perception, and cognizance-was 4.0 (2.5, 5.8), 8.0 (6.8, 8.8), and 6.5 (5.5, 8.0) out of 10, respectively. A moderate correlation was observed between the scores of cognizance and teach-back (r = 0.359, P = 0.002) or perception (r = 0.437, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis predicted being a patient and having lower education levels as independent risk factors of inadequate FHL (Ps = 0.001). Lack of patient-centeredness in ICFs, time constraints, and poor clinical communication were identified as barriers impeding informed consent.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates inadequacy in personal FHL and impaired organizational HL, resulting in compromised informed consent in Chinese teaching hospitals. As a remedy, we propose improving the quality of ICFs and institutionally mandated outcome-focused training on informed consent for all concerned clinicians to enhance medical ethics, ensure quality health care, address patient values, and mitigate potential medical conflicts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39180065
doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01089-x
pii: 10.1186/s12910-024-01089-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
91Subventions
Organisme : Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program in Shantou University Medical College
ID : 2021-43
Organisme : Undergraduate Research Training Program (UGRTP)
ID : LE0003
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Santana S, Brach C, Harris L, Ochiai E, Blakey C, Bevington F, Kleinman D, Pronk N. Updating health literacy for healthy people 2030: defining its importance for a New Decade in Public Health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 6):S258–64.
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001324
Brega AGBJ, Mabachi NM, Weiss BD, DeWalt DA, Brach C, Cifuentes M, Albright K, West DR. Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit, Second Edition. https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/health-literacy . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Wynia MK, Osborn CY. Health literacy and communication quality in health care organizations. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 2):102–15.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499981
Health Literacy. A Prescription to End Confusion. In: Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion edn. Edited by Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA. Washington (DC); 2004.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). What Is Health Literacy? https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Pape T. Legal and ethical considerations of informed consent. AORN J. 1997;65(6):1122–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62955-4 .
doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62955-4
Pietrzykowski T, Smilowska K. The reality of informed consent: empirical studies on patient comprehension-systematic review. Trials. 2021;22(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w .
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04969-w
Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, Schenker Y. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for Medical and Surgical procedures: an updated systematic review. Med Decis Mak. 2020;40(2):119–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19896348 .
doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348
Manta CJ, Ortiz J, Moulton BW, Sonnad SS. From the patient perspective, consent forms fall short of providing information to guide decision making. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(3):e149–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000310 .
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000310
Zhang D, Zhan W, Zheng C, Zhang J, Huang A, Hu S, Ba-Thein W. Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):736. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Older Adults. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/developmaterials/audiences/olderadults/index.html . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Kobayashi LC, Wardle J, Wolf MS, von Wagner C. Cognitive function and Health Literacy Decline in a cohort of Aging English adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(7):958–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3206-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3206-9
Kobayashi LC, Wardle J, Wolf MS, von Wagner C. Aging and Functional Health Literacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016;71(3):445–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu161 .
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu161
Department of Statista. U.S. population with a hospitalization 2000–2018 by age. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184447/us-population-with-a-hospitalization-by-age/ . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
The National Peole’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Practitioner Law of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202108/d954d9fa0af7458aa862182dc50a0d63.shtml . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
The National Peole’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Implementation details of medical institutions Management Ordinance. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fzs/s3576/201808/7a922e4803fa452f99d43a25ec0a3d77.shtml . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
The National Peole’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Regulations on Medical Institutions. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-12/25/content_5575075.htm . Accessed 15 Aug 2022.
The State Council. T The People’s Republic of China. The Regulation on the Handling of Medical Accidents. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-08/31/content_5318057.htm . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Li Z, Tian Y, Gong Z, Qian L. Health Literacy and Regional Heterogeneities in China: a Population-based study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:603325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.603325 .
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.603325
National Bureau of Statistics. China Health Statistics Yearbook. https://www.yearbookchina.com/navipage-n3022013080000229.html . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients’ literacy skills. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10(10):537–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02640361 .
doi: 10.1007/BF02640361
Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, Jackson RH, Bates P, George RB, Bairnsfather LE. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients. Fam Med. 1991;23(6):433–5.
Altin SV, Finke I, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S. The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1207. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1207 .
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1207
Mantwill S, Schulz PJ. Health literacy in Mainland China: validation of a functional health literacy test in simplified Chinese. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):742–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dav043 .
doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav043
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Teach-Back: Intervention. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/reports/engage/interventions/teachback.html . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Talevski J, Wong Shee A, Rasmussen B, Kemp G, Beauchamp A. Teach-back: a systematic review of implementation and impacts. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0231350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231350 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231350
Shields GS, Hunter CL, Yonelinas AP. Stress and memory encoding: what are the roles of the stress-encoding delay and stress relevance? Learn Mem. 2022;29(2):48–54. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.053469.121 .
doi: 10.1101/lm.053469.121
Lyons B, Dolezal L. Shame, health literacy and consent. Clin Ethics. 2024;19(2):150–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509231218203 .
doi: 10.1177/14777509231218203
Hamilton AFC, Lind F. Audience effects: what can they tell us about social neuroscience, theory of mind and autism? Cult Brain. 2016;4(2):159–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-016-0044-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s40167-016-0044-5
Shah P, Thornton I, Turrin D, Hipskind JE. Informed consent. StatPearls. edn. Treasure Island (FL); 2023.
Zhang D, Jiang Z, Xie Y, Wu W, Zhao Y, Huang A, Li T, Ba-Thein W. Linguistic barriers and healthcare in China: Chaoshan vs. Mandarin. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07744-6 .
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07744-6
Gong N, Zhou Y, Cheng Y, Chen X, Li X, Wang X, Chen G, Chen J, Meng H, Zhang M. Practice of informed consent in Guangdong, China: a qualitative study from the perspective of in-hospital patients. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020658. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020658 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020658
The Medical Protection Society (MPS). Informed consent – a time of change in Singapore. https://www.medicalprotection.org/singapore/casebook-resources/medicolegal-articles/articles/informed-consent-a-time-of-change-in-singapore . Accessed 27 Jul 2024.
Masaki S, Ishimoto H, Asai A. Contemporary issues concerning informed consent in Japan based on a review of court decisions and characteristics of Japanese culture. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-8 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-8
Cohen E, Byrom B, Becher A, Jornten-Karlsson M, Mackenzie AK. Comparative effectiveness of eConsent: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43883. https://doi.org/10.2196/43883 .
doi: 10.2196/43883
Gesualdo F, Daverio M, Palazzani L, Dimitriou D, Diez-Domingo J, Fons-Martinez J, Jackson S, Vignally P, Rizzo C, Tozzi AE. Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2021;22(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00585-8
Chimonas S, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Matsoukas K, Kuperman G. Electronic consent in clinical care: an international scoping review. BMJ Health Care Inf. 2023;30(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100726 .
Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(1):151–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10364247 .
doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364247
Federation EC. Electronic Informed Consent Implementation Guide Practical Considerations. https://www.eucrof.eu/images/Electronic_Informed_Consent_Implementation_Guide_Practical_Considerations_Version_1.0___March_2021_2.pdf . Accessed 12 Jun 2024.
Grady C, Cummings SR, Rowbotham MC, McConnell MV, Ashley EA, Kang G. Informed consent. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(9):856–67. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1603773 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1603773
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ten Attributes of Health Literate Health Care Organizations. https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/publications/ten-attributes.html . Accessed 12 Jun 2024.
Yong V, Zhao H, Gilmore K, Cripe J, Conklin C, Dauer E. Procedural-based Specialties Benefit from a formal informed consent and disclosures Educational Program. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(3):725–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.12.008