The proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase c-SRC facilitates glioblastoma progression by remodeling fatty acid synthesis.
Glioblastoma
/ metabolism
Humans
Proto-Oncogene Mas
Fatty Acids
/ metabolism
Cell Line, Tumor
Phosphorylation
Acetyl Coenzyme A
/ metabolism
Animals
CSK Tyrosine-Protein Kinase
/ metabolism
src-Family Kinases
/ metabolism
Disease Progression
Mice
Brain Neoplasms
/ metabolism
NADP
/ metabolism
Mice, Nude
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
05
01
2024
accepted:
08
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
28
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increased fatty acid synthesis benefits glioblastoma malignancy. However, the coordinated regulation of cytosolic acetyl-CoA production, the exclusive substrate for fatty acid synthesis, remains unclear. Here, we show that proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase c-SRC is activated in glioblastoma and remodels cytosolic acetyl-CoA production for fatty acid synthesis. Firstly, acetate is an important substrate for fatty acid synthesis in glioblastoma. c-SRC phosphorylates acetyl-CoA synthetase ACSS2 at Tyr530 and Tyr562 to stimulate the conversion of acetate to acetyl-CoA in cytosol. Secondly, c-SRC inhibits citrate-derived acetyl-CoA synthesis by phosphorylating ATP-citrate lyase ACLY at Tyr682. ACLY phosphorylation shunts citrate to IDH1-catalyzed NADPH production to provide reducing equivalent for fatty acid synthesis. The c-SRC-unresponsive double-mutation of ACSS2 and ACLY significantly reduces fatty acid synthesis and hampers glioblastoma progression. In conclusion, this remodeling fulfills the dual needs of glioblastoma cells for both acetyl-CoA and NADPH in fatty acid synthesis and provides evidence for glioma treatment by c-SRC inhibition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39198451
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51444-0
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-51444-0
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proto-Oncogene Mas
0
MAS1 protein, human
0
Fatty Acids
0
Acetyl Coenzyme A
72-89-9
CSK Tyrosine-Protein Kinase
EC 2.7.10.2
src-Family Kinases
EC 2.7.10.2
CSK protein, human
EC 2.7.10.23
NADP
53-59-8
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7455Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 82072777
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32070749
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : U21A20373
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Wen, P. Y. & Kesari, S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1850–1850 (2008).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0708126
Stupp, R. et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 987–996 (2005).
pubmed: 15758009
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330
Gilbert, M. R. et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 699–708 (2014).
pubmed: 24552317
pmcid: 4201043
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573
Warburg, O., Wind, F. & Negelein, E. The metabolism of tumors in the body. J. Gen. Physiol. 8, 519–530 (1927).
pubmed: 19872213
pmcid: 2140820
doi: 10.1085/jgp.8.6.519
Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314 (1956).
pubmed: 13298683
doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).
pubmed: 21376230
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013
Kroemer, G. & Pouyssegur, J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell 13, 472–482 (2008).
pubmed: 18538731
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005
DeBerardinis, R. J., Lum, J. J., Hatzivassiliou, G. & Thompson, C. B. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. Cell Metab. 7, 11–20 (2008).
pubmed: 18177721
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002
Koundouros, N. & Poulogiannis, G. Reprogramming of fatty acid metabolism in cancer. Br. J. Cancer 122, 4–22 (2019).
pubmed: 31819192
pmcid: 6964678
doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0650-z
Efeyan, A., Comb, W. C. & Sabatini, D. M. Nutrient-sensing mechanisms and pathways. Nature 517, 302–310 (2015).
pubmed: 25592535
pmcid: 4313349
doi: 10.1038/nature14190
Zaidi, N., Swinnen, J. V. & Smans, K. ATP-citrate lyase: a key player in cancer metabolism. Cancer Res. 72, 3709–3714 (2012).
pubmed: 22787121
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-4112
Wellen, K. E. et al. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science 324, 1076–1080 (2009).
pubmed: 19461003
pmcid: 2746744
doi: 10.1126/science.1164097
Currie, E., Schulze, A., Zechner, R., Walther, T. C. & Farese, R. V. Jr Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 18, 153–161 (2013).
pubmed: 23791484
pmcid: 3742569
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.017
Comerford, S. A. et al. Acetate dependence of tumors. Cell 159, 1591–1602 (2014).
pubmed: 25525877
pmcid: 4272450
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.020
Mashimo, T. et al. Acetate is a bioenergetic substrate for human glioblastoma and brain metastases. Cell 159, 1603–1614 (2014).
pubmed: 25525878
pmcid: 4374602
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.025
Schug, Z. T. et al. Acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 promotes acetate utilization and maintains cancer cell growth under metabolic stress. Cancer Cell 27, 57–71 (2015).
pubmed: 25584894
pmcid: 4297291
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.12.002
Gao, X. et al. Acetate functions as an epigenetic metabolite to promote lipid synthesis under hypoxia. Nat. Commun. 7, 11960 (2016).
pubmed: 27357947
pmcid: 4931325
doi: 10.1038/ncomms11960
Schug, Z. T., Vande Voorde, J. & Gottlieb, E. The metabolic fate of acetate in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 708–717 (2016).
pubmed: 27562461
pmcid: 8992383
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.87
Bloemen, J. G. et al. Short chain fatty acids exchange across the gut and liver in humans measured at surgery. Clin. Nutr. 28, 657–661 (2009).
pubmed: 19523724
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.011
Jeon, J. Y. et al. Regulation of acetate utilization by monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Oncol. Res. 26, 71–81 (2018).
pubmed: 28390113
pmcid: 7844556
doi: 10.3727/096504017X14902648894463
Li, M. et al. Monocarboxylate transporter 1 promotes proliferation and invasion of renal cancer cells by mediating acetate transport. Cell Biol. Int. 45, 1278–1287 (2021).
pubmed: 33559958
doi: 10.1002/cbin.11571
Sivaprakasam, S., Bhutia, Y. D., Yang, S. & Ganapathy, V. Short-chain fatty acid transporters: role in colonic homeostasis. Compr. Physiol. 8, 299–314 (2017).
pubmed: 29357130
pmcid: 6019286
doi: 10.1002/cphy.c170014
Liu, X. et al. Acetate production from glucose and coupling to mitochondrial metabolism in mammals. Cell 175, 502–513.e513 (2018).
pubmed: 30245009
pmcid: 6173642
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.040
Maher, E. A. et al. Metabolism of [U-13C]glucose in human brain tumors in vivo. NMR Biomed. 25, 1234–1244 (2012).
pubmed: 22419606
pmcid: 3406255
doi: 10.1002/nbm.2794
Martin, G. S. The hunting of the Src. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 467–475 (2001).
pubmed: 11389470
doi: 10.1038/35073094
Tice, D. A., Biscardi, J. S., Nickles, A. L. & Parsons, S. J. Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1415–1420 (1999).
pubmed: 9990038
pmcid: 15477
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1415
Brown, M. T. & Cooper, J. A. Regulation, substrates and functions of src. BBA Rev. Cancer 1287, 121–149 (1996).
Mori, S. et al. Identification of two juxtamembrane autophosphorylation sites in the PDGFβ-receptor; involvement in the interaction with Src family tyrosine kinases. EMBO J. 12, 2257–2264 (1993).
pubmed: 7685273
pmcid: 413454
doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05879.x
Yeatman, T. J. A renaissance for SRC. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 470–480 (2004).
pubmed: 15170449
doi: 10.1038/nrc1366
Zhang, J. et al. c-Src phosphorylation and activation of hexokinase promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 8, 13732 (2017).
pubmed: 28054552
pmcid: 5227066
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13732
Ma, H. et al. c-Src promotes tumorigenesis and tumor progression by activating PFKFB3. Cell Rep. 30, 4235–4249.e4236 (2020).
pubmed: 32209481
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.005
Ma, H. et al. c-Src facilitates tumorigenesis by phosphorylating and activating G6PD. Oncogene 40, 2567–2580 (2021).
pubmed: 33686238
doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01673-0
Menendez, J. A. & Lupu, R. Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 763–777 (2007).
pubmed: 17882277
doi: 10.1038/nrc2222
Schwer, B., Bunkenborg, J., Verdin, R. O., Andersen, J. S. & Verdin, E. Reversible lysine acetylation controls the activity of the mitochondrial enzyme acetyl-CoA synthetase 2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10224–10229 (2006).
pubmed: 16788062
pmcid: 1502439
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603968103
Yoshimura, Y., Araki, A., Maruta, H., Takahashi, Y. & Yamashita, H. Molecular cloning of rat acss3 and characterization of mammalian propionyl-CoA synthetase in the liver mitochondrial matrix. J. Biochem. 161, 279–289 (2017).
pubmed: 28003429
Eyme, K. M. et al. Targeting de novo lipid synthesis induces lipotoxicity and impairs DNA damage repair in glioblastoma mouse models. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eabq6288 (2023).
pubmed: 36652537
pmcid: 9942236
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abq6288
Miska, J. & Chandel, N. S. Targeting fatty acid metabolism in glioblastoma. J. Clin. Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163448 (2023).
Bulusu, V. et al. Acetate recapturing by nuclear acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 prevents loss of histone acetylation during oxygen and serum limitation. Cell Rep. 18, 647–658 (2017).
pubmed: 28099844
pmcid: 5276806
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.055
Yan, H. et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 765–773 (2009).
pubmed: 19228619
pmcid: 2820383
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710
Tommasini-Ghelfi, S. et al. Cancer-associated mutation and beyond: the emerging biology of isocitrate dehydrogenases in human disease. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw4543 (2019).
pubmed: 31131326
pmcid: 6530995
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw4543
Dang, L. et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 462, 739–744 (2009).
pubmed: 19935646
pmcid: 2818760
doi: 10.1038/nature08617
Reuss, D. E. Updates on the WHO diagnosis of IDH-mutant glioma. J. Neurooncol. 162, 461–469 (2023).
pubmed: 36717507
pmcid: 10227121
doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04250-5
Berger, T. R., Wen, P. Y., Lang-Orsini, M. & Chukwueke, U. N. World Health Organization 2021 classification of central nervous system tumors and implications for therapy for adult-type gliomas: a review. JAMA Oncol. 8, 1493–1501, (2022).
pubmed: 36006639
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2844
Zhang, S. & Yu, D. Targeting Src family kinases in anti-cancer therapies: turning promise into triumph. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 122–128 (2012).
pubmed: 22153719
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.11.002
Montero, J. C., Seoane, S., Ocana, A. & Pandiella, A. Inhibition of SRC family kinases and receptor tyrosine kinases by dasatinib: possible combinations in solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 5546–5552 (2011).
pubmed: 21670084
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2616
Mayer, E. L. & Krop, I. E. Advances in targeting SRC in the treatment of breast cancer and other solid malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 3526–3532 (2010).
pubmed: 20634194
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1834
Wheeler, D. L., Iida, M. & Dunn, E. F. The role of Src in solid tumors. Oncologist 14, 667–678 (2009).
pubmed: 19581523
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0009
Daud, A. I. et al. Phase I study of bosutinib, a src/abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, administered to patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 1092–1100 (2012).
pubmed: 22179664
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2378
Baselga, J. et al. Phase I safety, pharmacokinetics, and inhibition of SRC activity study of saracatinib in patients with solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 4876–4883 (2010).
pubmed: 20805299
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0748
Belli, S. et al. c-Src and EGFR inhibition in molecular cancer therapy: what else can we improve? Cancers 12, (2020).
Jaraiz-Rodriguez, M. et al. Connexin43 peptide, TAT-Cx43266-283, selectively targets glioma cells, impairs malignant growth, and enhances survival in mouse models in vivo. Neuro Oncol. 22, 493–504 (2020).
pubmed: 31883012
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz243
Talaveron, R., Matarredona, E. R., Herrera, A., Medina, J. M. & Tabernero, A. Connexin43 region 266-283, via Src inhibition, reduces neural progenitor cell proliferation promoted by EGF and FGF-2 and increases astrocytic differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228852 (2020).
Jaraiz-Rodriguez, M. et al. A short region of connexin43 reduces human glioma stem cell migration, invasion, and survival through Src, PTEN, and FAK. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 451–463 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.06.007
Jiang, N. et al. Fatty acid oxidation fuels glioblastoma radioresistance with CD47-mediated immune evasion. Nat. Commun. 13, 1511 (2022).
pubmed: 35314680
pmcid: 8938495
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29137-3
Kim, S. S., Pirollo, K. F. & Chang, E. H. Isolation and culturing of glioma cancer stem cells. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb2310s67 (2015).
Srere, P. A. The citrate cleavage enzyme. I. Distribution and purification. J. Biol. Chem. 234, 2544–2547 (1959).
pubmed: 13833535
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69735-2
Bauer, D. E., Hatzivassiliou, G., Zhao, F., Andreadis, C. & Thompson, C. B. ATP citrate lyase is an important component of cell growth and transformation. Oncogene 24, 6314–6322 (2005).
pubmed: 16007201
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208773
Lin, S. Y. et al. GSK3-TIP60-ULK1 signaling pathway links growth factor deprivation to autophagy. Science 336, 477–481 (2012).
pubmed: 22539723
doi: 10.1126/science.1217032
Chaneton, B. et al. Serine is a natural ligand and allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase M2. Nature 491, 458–462 (2012).
pubmed: 23064226
pmcid: 3894725
doi: 10.1038/nature11540
Metallo, C. M. et al. Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDH1 mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature 481, 380–384 (2011).
pubmed: 22101433
pmcid: 3710581
doi: 10.1038/nature10602