Functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback training targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces changes in cortico-striatal functional connectivity.
Humans
Neurofeedback
/ methods
Male
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared
/ methods
Female
Adult
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
/ physiology
Young Adult
Corpus Striatum
/ physiology
Brain Mapping
/ methods
Pilot Projects
Prefrontal Cortex
/ physiology
Cognition
/ physiology
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Eating behaviour
Functional connectivity
Functional near infrared spectroscopy
Magnetic resonance imaging
Neurofeedback
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Aug 2024
28 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
06
07
2023
accepted:
09
08
2024
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
28
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to its central role in cognitive control, the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been the target of multiple brain modulation studies. In the context of the present pilot study, the dlPFC was the target of eight repeated neurofeedback (NF) sessions with functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to assess the brain responses during NF and with functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging (task-based fMRI and rsMRI) scanning. Fifteen healthy participants were recruited. Cognitive task fMRI and rsMRI were performed during the 1st and the 8th NF sessions. During NF, our data revealed an increased activity in the dlPFC as well as in brain regions involved in cognitive control and self-regulation learning (pFWE < 0.05). Changes in functional connectivity between the 1st and the 8th session revealed increased connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex and the dlPFC, and between the posterior cingulate cortex and the dorsal striatum (pFWE < 0.05). Decreased left dlPFC-left insula connectivity was also observed. Behavioural results revealed a significant effect of hunger and motivation on the participant control feeling and a lower control feeling when participants did not identify an effective mental strategy, providing new insights on the effects of behavioural factors that may affect the NF learning.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39198481
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69863-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69863-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20025Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Friedman, N. P. & Robbins, T. W. The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology 47, 72–89 (2022).
pubmed: 34408280
doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0
Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 135–168 (2013).
pubmed: 23020641
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Tanji, J. & Hoshi, E. Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in executive behavioral control. Physiol. Rev. 88, 37–57 (2008).
pubmed: 18195082
doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2007
Rajkowska, G. & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: II. Variability in locations of areas 9 and 46 and relationship to the Talairach coordinate system. Cereb. Cortex 5, 323–337 (1995).
pubmed: 7580125
doi: 10.1093/cercor/5.4.323
Petrides, M. Lateral prefrontal cortex: Architectonic and functional organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 781–795 (2005).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1631
Haber, S. N. Corticostriatal circuitry. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 18, 7–21 (2016).
pubmed: 27069376
pmcid: 4826773
doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.1/shaber
Haber, S. N., Liu, H., Seidlitz, J. & Bullmore, E. Prefrontal connectomics: From anatomy to human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 47, 20–40 (2022).
pubmed: 34584210
doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01156-6
Menon, V. & D’Esposito, M. The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology 47, 90–103 (2022).
pubmed: 34408276
doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01152-w
Seeley, W. W. et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J. Neurosci. 27, 2349–2356 (2007).
pubmed: 17329432
pmcid: 2680293
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
Menon, V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model. Trends Cognit. Sci. 15, 483–506 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003
Chen, S., Dong, D., Jackson, T., Su, Y. & Chen, H. Altered frontal inter-hemispheric resting state functional connectivity is associated with bulimic symptoms among restrained eaters. Neuropsychologia 81, 22–30 (2016).
pubmed: 26160289
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.036
Biezonski, D., Cha, J., Steinglass, J. & Posner, J. Evidence for thalamocortical circuit abnormalities and associated cognitive dysfunctions in underweight individuals with anorexia nervosa. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 1560–1568 (2016).
pubmed: 26462619
doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.314
Val-Laillet, D. et al. Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity. NeuroImage Clin. 8, 1–31 (2015).
pubmed: 26110109
pmcid: 4473270
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.016
Benjamin, L. & Wulfert, E. Dispositional correlates of addictive behaviors in college women: Binge eating and heavy drinking. Eat. Behav. 6, 197–209 (2005).
pubmed: 15854866
doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2003.08.001
Jasinska, A. J. et al. Impulsivity and inhibitory control deficits are associated with unhealthy eating in young adults. Appetite 59, 738–747 (2012).
pubmed: 22885454
pmcid: 3490037
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.001
Oliva, R., Morys, F., Horstmann, A., Castiello, U. & Begliomini, C. The impulsive brain: Neural underpinnings of binge eating behavior in normal-weight adults. Appetite 136, 33–49 (2019).
pubmed: 30615922
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.043
Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A. & Buhle, J. T. Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1251, E1–E24 (2012).
pubmed: 23025352
pmcid: 4133790
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x
Godet, A., Fortier, A., Bannier, E., Coquery, N. & Val-Laillet, D. Interactions between emotions and eating behaviors: Main issues, neuroimaging contributions, and innovative preventive or corrective strategies. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 23, 807–831 (2022).
pubmed: 34984602
doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09700-x
Hollmann, M., Pleger, B., Villringer, A. & Horstmann, A. Brain imaging in the context of food perception and eating. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 24, 18–24 (2013).
pubmed: 23165087
doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e32835b61a4
Rolls, E. Functions of the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex in taste, olfaction, appetite and emotion. Acta Physiol. Hung. 95, 131–164 (2008).
pubmed: 18642756
doi: 10.1556/APhysiol.95.2008.2.1
Shin, A. C., Zheng, H. & Berthoud, H. R. An expanded view of energy homeostasis: Neural integration of metabolic, cognitive, and emotional drives to eat. Physiol. Behav. 97, 572–580 (2009).
pubmed: 19419661
pmcid: 2765252
doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.010
Craig, A. D. B. How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009).
pubmed: 19096369
doi: 10.1038/nrn2555
Jung, J. Y., Lambon Ralph, M. A. & Jackson, R. L. Subregions of DLPFC display graded yet distinct structural and functional connectivity. J. Neurosci. 42, 3241–3252 (2022).
pubmed: 35232759
pmcid: 8994544
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1216-21.2022
Weygandt, M. et al. The role of neural impulse control mechanisms for dietary success in obesity. Neuroimage 83, 669–678 (2013).
pubmed: 23867558
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.028
Hollmann, M. et al. Neural correlates of the volitional regulation of the desire for food. Int. J. Obes. 36, 648–655 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.125
Le, D. S. N. T. et al. Less activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to a meal: A feature of obesity. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84, 725–731 (2006).
pubmed: 17023697
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.4.725
Baek, K., Morris, L. S., Kundu, P. & Voon, V. Disrupted resting-state brain network properties in obesity: Decreased global and putaminal cortico-striatal network efficiency. Psychol. Med. 47, 585–596 (2017).
pubmed: 27804899
doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002646
Chen, F., He, Q., Han, Y., Zhang, Y. & Gao, X. Increased BOLD signals in dlPFC is associated with stronger self-control in food-related decision-making. Front. Psychiatry 9, 1–8 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00689
Barth, B., Strehl, U., Fallgatter, A. J. & Ehlis, A.-C. Near-infrared spectroscopy based neurofeedback of prefrontal cortex activity: A proof-of-concept study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 1–13 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00633
Sitaram, R. et al. Closed-loop brain training: The science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 86–100 (2017).
pubmed: 28003656
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164
Gaume, A., Vialatte, A., Mora-Sánchez, A., Ramdani, C. & Vialatte, F. B. A psychoengineering paradigm for the neurocognitive mechanisms of biofeedback and neurofeedback. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 891–910 (2016).
pubmed: 27339691
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.012
Thibault, R. T., MacPherson, A., Lifshitz, M., Roth, R. R. & Raz, A. Neurofeedback with fMRI: A critical systematic review. Neuroimage 172, 786–807 (2018).
pubmed: 29288868
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.071
Muñoz-Moldes, S. & Cleeremans, A. Delineating implicit and explicit processes in neurofeedback learning. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 118, 681–688 (2020).
pubmed: 32918947
pmcid: 7758707
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.003
Autenrieth, M., Kober, S. E., Neuper, C. & Wood, G. How much do strategy reports tell about the outcomes of neurofeedback training? A study on the voluntary up-regulation of the sensorimotor rhythm. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 1–12 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00218
Kober, S. E., Witte, M., Ninaus, M., Neuper, C. & Wood, G. Learning to modulate one’s own brain activity: The effect of spontaneous mental strategies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 1–12 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00695
Ros, T. et al. Consensus on the reporting and experimental design of clinical and cognitive-behavioural neurofeedback studies (CRED-nf checklist). Brain 143, 1674–1685 (2020).
pubmed: 32176800
pmcid: 7296848
doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa009
Kadosh, K. C. & Staunton, G. A systematic review of the psychological factors that influence neurofeedback learning outcomes. Neuroimage 185, 545–555 (2019).
pubmed: 30315905
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.021
Pereira, D. J. et al. Neurofeedback-dependent influence of the ventral striatum using a working memory paradigm targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 17, 1–15 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1014223
Sherwood, M. S., Kane, J. H., Weisend, M. P. & Parker, J. G. Enhanced control of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex neurophysiology with real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) neurofeedback training and working memory practice. Neuroimage 124, 214–223 (2016).
pubmed: 26348555
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.074
Kohl, S. H. et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training to improve eating behavior by self-regulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A randomized controlled trial in overweight and obese subjects. Neuroimage 191, 596–609 (2019).
pubmed: 30798010
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.033
Blume, F. et al. NIRS-based neurofeedback training in a virtual reality classroom for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 18, 41 (2017).
pubmed: 28118856
pmcid: 5259870
doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1769-3
Marx, A.-M. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) neurofeedback as a treatment for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—a pilot study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 1–13 (2015).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01038
Hudak, J. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy-based frontal lobe neurofeedback integrated in virtual reality modulates brain and behavior in highly impulsive adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 1–13 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00425
Kimmig, A.-C.S. et al. Feasibility of NIRS-based neurofeedback training in social anxiety disorder: Behavioral and neural correlates. J. Neural Transm. 126, 1175–1185 (2019).
pubmed: 30498952
doi: 10.1007/s00702-018-1954-5
Aranyi, G., Pecune, F., Charles, F., Pelachaud, C. & Cavazza, M. Affective interaction with a virtual character through an fNIRS brain-computer interface. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 10, 1–14 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fncom.2016.00070
Aranyi, G., Charles, F. & Cavazza, M. Anger-based BCI Using fNIRS Neurofeedback. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology 511–521 (ACM, 2015).
doi: 10.1145/2807442.2807447
Yu, L. et al. Improving emotion regulation through real-time neurofeedback training on the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Evidence from behavioral and brain network analyses. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 15, 1–11 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.620342
Hilbert, A. et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography neurofeedback for binge-eating disorder: An exploratory randomized trial. Psychol. Med. 54, 675–686 (2024).
pubmed: 37964437
doi: 10.1017/S0033291723002350
Maywald, M. et al. Individual- and connectivity-based real-time fmri neurofeedback to modulate emotion-related brain responses in patients with depression: A pilot study. Brain Sci. 12, 1714 (2022).
pubmed: 36552173
pmcid: 9775232
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121714
Morgenroth, E. et al. Using connectivity-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback to modulate attentional and resting state networks in people with high trait anxiety. NeuroImage Clin. 25, 102191 (2020).
pubmed: 32044712
pmcid: 7013190
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102191
Weiss, F., Zhang, J., Aslan, A., Kirsch, P. & Gerchen, M. F. Feasibility of training the dorsolateral prefrontal–striatal network by real-time fMRI neurofeedback. Sci. Rep. 12, 1669 (2022).
pubmed: 35102203
pmcid: 8803939
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05675-0
Spetter, M. S. et al. Volitional regulation of brain responses to food stimuli in overweight and obese subjects: A real-time fMRI feedback study. Appetite 112, 188–195 (2017).
pubmed: 28131758
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.032
Strehl, U. What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 1–8 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00894
Arns, M. et al. Neurofeedback: One of today’s techniques in psychiatry?. Encephale 43, 135–145 (2017).
pubmed: 28041692
doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.11.003
Birbaumer, N., Ruiz, S. & Sitaram, R. Learned regulation of brain metabolism. Trends Cognit. Sci. 17, 295–302 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.009
Ninaus, M. et al. Neural substrates of cognitive control under the belief of getting neurofeedback training. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 1–10 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00914
von Lühmann, A., Ortega-Martinez, A., Boas, D. A. & Yücel, M. A. Using the general linear model to improve performance in fNIRS single trial analysis and classification: A perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 1–17 (2020).
Balleine, B. W. & O’Doherty, J. P. Human and rodent homologies in action control: Corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 48–69 (2010).
pubmed: 19776734
doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.131
Delgado, M. R., Miller, M. M., Inati, S. & Phelps, E. A. An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning. Neuroimage 24, 862–873 (2005).
pubmed: 15652321
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.002
Balleine, B. W., Delgado, M. R. & Hikosaka, O. The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making: Figure 1. J. Neurosci. 27, 8161–8165 (2007).
pubmed: 17670959
pmcid: 6673072
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-07.2007
Zhao, Z. et al. Putamen volume predicts real-time fMRI neurofeedback learning success across paradigms and neurofeedback target regions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 1879–1887 (2021).
pubmed: 33400306
pmcid: 7978128
doi: 10.1002/hbm.25336
Skottnik, L., Sorger, B., Kamp, T., Linden, D. & Goebel, R. Success and failure of controlling the real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback signal are reflected in the striatum. Brain Behav. 9, e01240 (2019).
pubmed: 30790474
pmcid: 6422826
doi: 10.1002/brb3.1240
Vogt, B. A. Cingulate cortex in the three limbic subsystems. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology 39–51 (Elsevier, 2019).
Rolls, E. T. The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 3001–3018 (2019).
pubmed: 31451898
pmcid: 6875144
doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2
Hardwick, R. M., Caspers, S., Eickhoff, S. B. & Swinnen, S. P. Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 94, 31–44 (2018).
pubmed: 30098990
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
Liakakis, G., Nickel, J. & Seitz, R. J. Diversity of the inferior frontal gyrus—A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Behav. Brain Res. 225, 341–347 (2011).
pubmed: 21729721
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.022
Hagoort, P. On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends Cognit. Sci. 9, 416–423 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004
Bookheimer, S. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 151–188 (2002).
pubmed: 12052907
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946
Morin, A. & Michaud, J. Self-awareness and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Inner speech use during self-related processing. Brain Res. Bull. 74, 387–396 (2007).
pubmed: 17920447
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.06.013
Emmert, K. et al. Meta-analysis of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies using individual participant data: How is brain regulation mediated?. Neuroimage 124, 806–812 (2016).
pubmed: 26419389
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.042
Lee, S., Ruiz, S., Caria, A. & Veit, R. Detection of cerebral reorganization induced by real-time fMRI feedback training of insula activation : A multivariate investigation. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 25, 259–267 (2011).
pubmed: 21357528
doi: 10.1177/1545968310385128
Pearson, J. M., Heilbronner, S. R., Barack, D. L., Hayden, B. Y. & Platt, M. L. Posterior cingulate cortex: Adapting behavior to a changing world. Trends Cognit. Sci. 15, 143–151 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.002
Leech, R. & Sharp, D. J. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain 137, 12–32 (2014).
pubmed: 23869106
doi: 10.1093/brain/awt162
Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F. & Liberzon, I. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16, 331–348 (2002).
pubmed: 12030820
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
Etkin, A., Büchel, C. & Gross, J. J. The neural bases of emotion regulation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 693–700 (2015).
pubmed: 26481098
doi: 10.1038/nrn4044
Helion, C., Krueger, S. M. & Ochsner, K. N. Emotion regulation across the life span. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 163, 257–280 (2019).
pubmed: 31590734
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804281-6.00014-8
Krylova, M. et al. Progressive modulation of resting-state brain activity during neurofeedback of positive-social emotion regulation networks. Sci. Rep. 11, 23363 (2021).
pubmed: 34862407
pmcid: 8642545
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02079-4
Yang, X. et al. A brief real-time fNIRS-informed neurofeedback training of the prefrontal cortex changes brain activity and connectivity during subsequent working memory challenge. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 132, 110968 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.110968
Sorger, B., Scharnowski, F., Linden, D. E. J., Hampson, M. & Young, K. D. Control freaks: Towards optimal selection of control conditions for fMRI neurofeedback studies. Neuroimage 186, 256–265 (2019).
pubmed: 30423429
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.004
Fede, S. J., Dean, S. F., Manuweera, T. & Momenan, R. A guide to literature informed decisions in the design of real time fMRI neurofeedback studies: A systematic review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 14, 60 (2020).
pubmed: 32161529
pmcid: 7052377
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00060
Kohl, S. H. et al. The potential of functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based neurofeedback—A systematic review and recommendations for best practice. Front. Neurosci. 14, 594 (2020).
pubmed: 32848528
pmcid: 7396619
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00594
Godet, A. et al. Subjective feeling of control during fNIRS-based neurofeedback targeting the DL-PFC is related to neural activation determined with short-channel correction. PLoS One 18, e0290005 (2023).
pubmed: 37585456
pmcid: 10431651
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290005
Peirce, J. et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 195–203 (2019).
pubmed: 30734206
pmcid: 6420413
doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Delpy, D. T. et al. Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement. Phys. Med. Biol. 33, 1433–1442 (1988).
pubmed: 3237772
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/33/12/008
Gramfort, A. et al. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front. Neurosci. 7, 1–13 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00267
Abraham, A. et al. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn. Front. Neuroinform. 8, 1–10 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00014
Pollonini, L., Bortfeld, H. & Oghalai, J. S. PHOEBE: A method for real time mapping of optodes-scalp coupling in functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 5104 (2016).
pubmed: 28018728
pmcid: 5175555
doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.005104
Cardenas, V. A. et al. Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression. Brain Stimul. 15, 63–72 (2022).
pubmed: 34767967
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008
Coquery, N. et al. Brain responses to food choices and decisions depend on individual hedonic profiles and eating habits in healthy young women. Front. Nutr. 9, 920170 (2022).
pubmed: 35811938
pmcid: 9263555
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.920170
Nieto-Castanon, A. Handbook of Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods in CONN (Hilbert Press, 2020).
doi: 10.56441/hilbertpress.2207.6598
Stopyra, M. A. et al. Altered functional connectivity in binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa: A resting-state fMRI study. Brain Behav. 9, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/brb3.1207
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A. & Bullmore, E. T. Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 53, 1197–1207 (2010).
pubmed: 20600983
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041
Zalesky, A., Cocchi, L., Fornito, A., Murray, M. M. & Bullmore, E. Connectivity differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 60, 1055–1062 (2012).
pubmed: 22273567
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.068
Zeger, S. L. & Liang, K.-Y. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42, 121 (1986).
pubmed: 3719049
doi: 10.2307/2531248
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K.-Y. & Albert, P. S. Models for longitudinal data: A generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 44, 1049 (1988).
pubmed: 3233245
doi: 10.2307/2531734