Correction of Acquired Leg Length Discrepancy after Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty by Revision Resurfacing: A Case Report.
Journal
JBJS case connector
ISSN: 2160-3251
Titre abrégé: JBJS Case Connect
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596828
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline:
31
8
2024
pubmed:
31
8
2024
entrez:
29
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A 53-year-old man presented with a 13-mm leg length discrepancy following left hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), resulting in pain and imbalance. Advanced osteoarthritis of the contralateral hip was also noted. The patient strongly preferred HRA over total hip arthroplasty. Adequate remaining bone stock and the ability to resurface the contralateral hip allowed for resolution with 2 HRAs. This is the first known revision of a HRA with a subsequent HRA. Assuming sufficient bone stock and precise implant positioning, resurfacing presents a feasible methodology to overcome complex anatomical deformities and improve mobility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39208141
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.23.00647
pii: 01709767-202409000-00039
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C445).
Références
LeBrun DG, Shen TS, Bovonratwet P, Morgenstern R, Su EP. Hip resurfacing vs total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 35 Years: a comparison of revision rates and patient-reported outcomes. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:229-33.
McLawhorn AS, Buller LT, Blevins JL, Lee YY, Su EP. What are the benefits of hip resurfacing in appropriate patients? A retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis. HSS J. 2020;16(suppl 2):316-26.
Haddad FS, Konan S, Tahmassebi J. A prospective comparative study of cementless total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing in patients under the age of 55 years: a ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(5):617-22.
Loughead JM, Starks I, Chesney D, Matthews JN, McCaskie AW, Holland JP. Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(1):31-4.
Quesada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(7 suppl):69-73.
De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, Doubi R, Backers K, Grammatopoulos G. Revisions of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011;42(2):259-69, ix.
Mellon SJ, Grammatopoulos G, Andersen MS, Pandit HG, Gill HS, Murray DW. Optimal acetabular component orientation estimated using edge-loading and impingement risk in patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Biomech. 2015;48(2):318-23.
Underwood RJ, Zografos A, Sayles RS, Hart A, Cann P. Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012;226(3):217-26.
Zhang Y, He W, Cheng T, Zhang X. Total hip arthroplasty: leg length discrepancy affects functional outcomes and patient's gait. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;72(1):215-9.
Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Bissett GA, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(12):2310-7.
Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(1 suppl):S9-20.
McWilliams AB, Lampropoulos A, Stone MH. Revision surgery for leg length inequality after primary hip replacement. Hip Int. 2018;28(5):554-8.
Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E, Pullen C, Confalonieri N. Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand. Int Orthop. 2011;35(1):19-24.
Elbuluk A, Fiaes K, Benson JR, Su E. Computer-assisted navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a case study utilizing the ReCap femoral resurfacing system. J Orthop Case Rep. 2019;9(3):93-7.
Shah R, Benson JR, Muir JM. Computer-assisted navigation in Birmingham hip resurfacing: a case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2018;6:2050313X18819641.
Kuijpers MFL, Colo E, Schmitz MWJL, Hannink G, Rijnen WHC, Schreurs BW. The outcome of subsequent revisions after primary total hip arthroplasty in 1,049 patients aged under 50 years: a single-centre cohort study with a follow-up of more than 30 years. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(3):368-75.
Salmons HI, Fruth KM, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptically failed metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(12):2399-405.
Aghayev E, Beck A, Staub LP, Dietrich D, Melloh M, Orljanski W, Röder C. Simultaneous bilateral hip replacement reveals superior outcome and fewer complications than two-stage procedures: a prospective study including 1819 patients and 5801 follow-ups from a total joint replacement registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:245.