Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: an analysis of monthly changes in the quality and outcomes framework indicators in OpenSAFELY.


Journal

Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Aug 2024
Historique:
received: 01 05 2024
accepted: 07 06 2024
medline: 31 8 2024
pubmed: 31 8 2024
entrez: 30 8 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cardiovascular disease management in primary care in England. To describe the impact of the pandemic on blood pressure screening and hypertension management based on a national quality of care scheme (Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) across key demographic, regional and clinical subgroups. With NHS England approval, a population-based cohort study was conducted using OpenSAFELY-TPP on 25.2 million NHS patients registered at general practices (March 2019 to March 2023). We examined monthly changes in recorded blood pressure screening in the preceding 5 years in patients aged ≥45 years and recorded the hypertension prevalence and the percentage of patients treated to target (≤140/90 mmHg for patients aged ≤79 years and ≤150/90 mmHg for patients aged ≥80 years) in the preceding 12 months. The percentage of patients aged ≥45 years who had blood pressure screening recorded in the preceding 5 years decreased from 90% (March 2019) to 85% (March 2023). Recorded hypertension prevalence was relatively stable at 15% throughout the study period. The percentage of patients with a record of hypertension treated to target in the preceding 12 months reduced from a maximum of 71% (March 2020) to a minimum of 47% (February 2021) in patients aged ≤79 years and from 85% (March 2020) to a minimum of 58% (February 2021) in patients aged ≥80 years before recovery. Blood pressure screening rates in the preceding 5 years remained stable in older people, patients with recorded learning disability or care home status. The pandemic substantially disrupted hypertension management QOF indicators, which is likely attributable to general reductions of blood pressure measurement including screening. OpenSAFELY can be used to continuously monitor changes in national quality-of-care schemes to identify changes in key clinical subgroups early and support prioritisation of recovery from care disrupted by COVID-19.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cardiovascular disease management in primary care in England.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To describe the impact of the pandemic on blood pressure screening and hypertension management based on a national quality of care scheme (Quality and Outcomes Framework, QOF) across key demographic, regional and clinical subgroups.
METHODS METHODS
With NHS England approval, a population-based cohort study was conducted using OpenSAFELY-TPP on 25.2 million NHS patients registered at general practices (March 2019 to March 2023). We examined monthly changes in recorded blood pressure screening in the preceding 5 years in patients aged ≥45 years and recorded the hypertension prevalence and the percentage of patients treated to target (≤140/90 mmHg for patients aged ≤79 years and ≤150/90 mmHg for patients aged ≥80 years) in the preceding 12 months.
RESULTS RESULTS
The percentage of patients aged ≥45 years who had blood pressure screening recorded in the preceding 5 years decreased from 90% (March 2019) to 85% (March 2023). Recorded hypertension prevalence was relatively stable at 15% throughout the study period. The percentage of patients with a record of hypertension treated to target in the preceding 12 months reduced from a maximum of 71% (March 2020) to a minimum of 47% (February 2021) in patients aged ≤79 years and from 85% (March 2020) to a minimum of 58% (February 2021) in patients aged ≥80 years before recovery. Blood pressure screening rates in the preceding 5 years remained stable in older people, patients with recorded learning disability or care home status.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The pandemic substantially disrupted hypertension management QOF indicators, which is likely attributable to general reductions of blood pressure measurement including screening. OpenSAFELY can be used to continuously monitor changes in national quality-of-care schemes to identify changes in key clinical subgroups early and support prioritisation of recovery from care disrupted by COVID-19.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39214534
pii: openhrt-2024-002732
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002732
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare the following: BG has received research funding from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the NHS National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the NIHR School of Primary Care Research, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the Mohn-Westlake Foundation, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley, the Wellcome Trust, the Good Thinking Foundation, Health Data Research UK, the Health Foundation, the World Health Organisation, UKRI, Asthma UK, the British Lung Foundation and the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing strand of the National Core Studies programme; he also receives personal income from speaking and writing for lay audiences on the misuse of science.

Auteurs

Milan Wiedemann (M)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK milan.wiedemann@phc.ox.ax.uk.

Victoria Speed (V)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Christine Cunningham (C)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Rose Higgins (R)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Helen J Curtis (HJ)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Colm Andrews (C)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Louis Fisher (L)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Lisa Hopcroft (L)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Christopher T Rentsch (CT)

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Viyaasan Mahalingasivam (V)

Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Laurie Tomlinson (L)

Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK.

Caroline Morton (C)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Miriam Samuel (M)

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Amelia Green (A)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Christopher Wood (C)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Andrew D Brown (AD)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jon Massey (J)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Caroline Walters (C)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Rebecca M Smith (RM)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Peter Inglesby (P)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

David Evans (D)

The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Steven Maude (S)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Iain Dillingham (I)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Alex J Walker (AJ)

The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jessica Morley (J)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Amir Mehrkar (A)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Seb Bacon (S)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

John Parry (J)

TPP, Leeds, UK.

Frank Hester (F)

TPP, Leeds, UK.

Richard J McManus (RJ)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Ben Goldacre (B)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Brian MacKenna (B)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH