Motivators and barriers for studying podiatry in Australia and New Zealand: A mixed methods study.
career choice
health workforce
podiatry
students
university
Journal
Journal of foot and ankle research
ISSN: 1757-1146
Titre abrégé: J Foot Ankle Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101471610
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
30
05
2024
accepted:
16
08
2024
medline:
4
9
2024
pubmed:
4
9
2024
entrez:
4
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Podiatry enrolments at Australian and New Zealand universities have decreased by 17.3% since 2015, which threatens the profession's sustainability and the health and wellbeing of Australian and New Zealand people and communities. Reasons for this decline remain unclear due to insufficient evidence on factors influencing career choices. The overarching aim of this study was to identify motivators and barriers for studying podiatry in Australia and New Zealand. This study used a convergent mixed methods design. Students enrolled in (i) podiatry and (ii) relevant non-podiatry health, sport or science programs at nine Australian and one New Zealand university, were invited to participate in an online survey. First-year podiatry students were also invited to participate in an online workshop. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear/logistic regression models. Three independent assessors used inductive thematic analysis for the qualitative data. Overall, 278 podiatry students (mean age 24.9 ± 8.5 years, 65.1% female) and 553 non-podiatry students (mean age 24.8 ± 8.2 years, 75.4% female; 32.2% from physiotherapy and 29.1% from occupational therapy) responded to the survey. Interest in a health-related career, wanting to make a difference to people's health, and opportunity to care for people from different backgrounds/age groups were key motivating factors among podiatry students. Barriers to studying podiatry were encountered by 28.1% of podiatry students. Thematic analysis identified seven themes concerning career choice, which are as follows: (i) awareness of profession and scope of practice; (ii) stereotypes and negative perceptions of the profession; (iii) awareness of career pathways; (iv) job prospects and earning potential; (v) working with people and building relationships; (vi) podiatry is not the first preference; and (vii) barriers which limit student enrolment. There are a variety of factors that motivate and influence students to study podiatry, however, altruistic reasons are most highly rated. Allied health students have limited understanding of the scope of practice and career opportunities in podiatry. Additionally, the podiatry profession often faces negative stereotypes. Further work is required to reverse the negative stereotypes and perceptions of podiatry and build knowledge of the profession's scope of practice, career pathways/opportunities, job prospects and earning potential.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Podiatry enrolments at Australian and New Zealand universities have decreased by 17.3% since 2015, which threatens the profession's sustainability and the health and wellbeing of Australian and New Zealand people and communities. Reasons for this decline remain unclear due to insufficient evidence on factors influencing career choices. The overarching aim of this study was to identify motivators and barriers for studying podiatry in Australia and New Zealand.
METHODS
METHODS
This study used a convergent mixed methods design. Students enrolled in (i) podiatry and (ii) relevant non-podiatry health, sport or science programs at nine Australian and one New Zealand university, were invited to participate in an online survey. First-year podiatry students were also invited to participate in an online workshop. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and linear/logistic regression models. Three independent assessors used inductive thematic analysis for the qualitative data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 278 podiatry students (mean age 24.9 ± 8.5 years, 65.1% female) and 553 non-podiatry students (mean age 24.8 ± 8.2 years, 75.4% female; 32.2% from physiotherapy and 29.1% from occupational therapy) responded to the survey. Interest in a health-related career, wanting to make a difference to people's health, and opportunity to care for people from different backgrounds/age groups were key motivating factors among podiatry students. Barriers to studying podiatry were encountered by 28.1% of podiatry students. Thematic analysis identified seven themes concerning career choice, which are as follows: (i) awareness of profession and scope of practice; (ii) stereotypes and negative perceptions of the profession; (iii) awareness of career pathways; (iv) job prospects and earning potential; (v) working with people and building relationships; (vi) podiatry is not the first preference; and (vii) barriers which limit student enrolment.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There are a variety of factors that motivate and influence students to study podiatry, however, altruistic reasons are most highly rated. Allied health students have limited understanding of the scope of practice and career opportunities in podiatry. Additionally, the podiatry profession often faces negative stereotypes. Further work is required to reverse the negative stereotypes and perceptions of podiatry and build knowledge of the profession's scope of practice, career pathways/opportunities, job prospects and earning potential.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e70004Subventions
Organisme : Australian Podiatry Education and Research Foundation
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Foot and Ankle Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Podiatry Association and The Royal College of Podiatry.
Références
Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Health. 2022. Future Focused Primary Health Care: Australia's Primary Health Care 10 Year Plan 2022–2032. Canberra (AU): Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australias‐primary‐health‐care‐10‐year‐plan‐2022‐2032.
Couch, Anna G., Terry Haines, Belinda O'Sullivan, Hylton B. Menz, and Cylie M. Williams. 2023. “Financial Characteristics and Security of Podiatry Work in Victoria: the PAIGE Cross Sectional Study of Australian Podiatrists.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16(1): 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐023‐00657‐5.
Ministry of Health New Zealand. 2020. The Cost and Value of Employment in the Health and Disability Sector. Wellington (NZ): Ministry of Health. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/cost‐and‐value‐employment‐health‐and‐disability‐sector.
Australian Podiatry Association. 2023. What Is podiatry? Melbourne (AU): Australian Podiatry Association. https://www.podiatry.org.au/about/what‐is‐podiatry.
Carroll, Matthew, Hannah Jepson, Prue Molyneux, and Angela Brenton‐Rule. 2020. “The New Zealand Podiatry Profession—A Workforce in Crisis?” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 13(1): 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐020‐00430‐y.
Couch, Anna, Terry Haines, Belinda O'Sullivan, Hylton B. Menz, and Cylie M. Williams. 2023. “Australian Podiatry Workforce: Findings from the PAIGE Cross‐Sectional Study of Australian Podiatrists.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16(1): 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐023‐00646‐8.
Podiatry Board of Australia (AHPRA). 2024. Registrant Data: 1 October 2023 to 31 December 2023. Melbourne (AU): Podiatry Board of Australia. https://www.podiatryboard.gov.au/about/statistics.aspx.
Podiatrists Board of New Zealand. 2023. Annual Report: 1 April 2022 – 31 March 2023. Wellington (NZ): Podiatrists Board of New Zealand. https://podiatristsboard.org.nz/news‐resources‐forms/newsletters‐annual‐reports/.
Podiatry Board of Australia (AHPRA). 2022. Podiatry Workforce Analysis – June 2022. Melbourne (AU): Podiatry Board of Australia. https://www.podiatryboard.gov.au/
Australian Podiatry Association. 2022. National Podiatry Workforce Summit ‐ Report 2022. Melbourne (AU): Australian Podiatry Association. https://www.podiatry.org.au/advocacy/resources/workforce‐summit‐report.
New South Wales Ministry of Health, Francis Health. 2015. Podiatry ‐ Horizon Scanning and Scenario Generation (Including Addendum with Validation of Findings Completed July 2017). Sydney (AU): New South Wales Ministry of Health. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/workforce/alliedhealth/Pages/podiatry.aspx/1000.
Carroll, Matthew, Ibrahim Saleh Al‐Busaidi, Kirsten J. Coppell, Michele Garrett, Belinda Ihaka, Claire O'Shea, Justina Wu, and Steve York. 2022. “Diabetes‐related Foot Disease Research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a Bibliometric Analysis (1970‐2020).” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15(1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐022‐00528‐5.
Australian Council of Podiatry Deans (ACPD). 2023. Total Commencing Podiatry Enrolments – Data from 2015‐2023. Melbourne (AU): Australian Council of Podiatry Deans.
Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care. 2024. Unleashing the Potential of Our Health Workforce ‐ Scope of Practice Review (Issues Paper 1). https://www.health.gov.au/our‐work/scope‐of‐practice‐review. Accessed July 24, 2024.
Wiggins, Desmond, Aron Downie, Roger M. Engel, and Benjamin T. Brown. 2022. “Factors that Influence Scope of Practice of the Five Largest Health Care Professions in Australia: A Scoping Review.” Human Resources for Health 20(1): 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960‐022‐00783‐4.
Bonanno, Daniel R., Anna Couch, Terry Haines, Hylton B. Menz, Belinda G. O'Sullivan, and Cylie M. Williams. 2024. “Burnout in Podiatrists Associated with Individual Characteristics, Workplace and Job Satisfaction: A National Survey.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 17(2): e12003. https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12003.
Beeler, Erin, Angela Brenton‐Rule, and Matthew Carroll. 2022. “Recruitment and Retention of the Rural Podiatry Workforce in Aotearoa New Zealand: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Podiatrist Perceptions.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15(1): 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐022‐00562‐3.
Couch, Anna, Hylton B. Menz, Belinda O'Sullivan, Terry Haines, and Cylie M. Williams. 2023. “Describing the Factors Related to Rural Podiatry Work and Retention in the Podiatry Workforce: A National Survey.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 16(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐023‐00603‐5.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2024. Rural and Remote Health. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural‐remote‐australians/rural‐and‐remote‐health.
Wallis, Lucy, James Faulkner, Rachel Locke, Beverley Harden, and Emma E. Cowley. 2022. “Motivations, Sources of Influence and Barriers to Being a Podiatrist: A National Questionnaire of Student Views.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 15(1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐022‐00551‐6.
Whitham, D., S. Whitham, M. Trowell, and S. Otter. 2021. “Podiatry as a Career in the UK ‐ what Attracts Generation Z? A Qualitative Exploration with University and College Students.” Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 14(1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047‐021‐00470‐y.
Menz, Hylton B., Francis A. Stewart, and Matthew J. Oates. 2003. “Knowledge of Aging and Attitudes toward Older People. A Survey of Australian Podiatric Medical Students.” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 93(1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315‐93‐1‐11.
Creswell, J. W., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fetters, Michael D., Leslie A. Curry, and John W. Creswell. 2013. “Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs‐Principles and Practices.” Health Services Research 48(6 Pt 2): 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475‐6773.12117.
O'cathain, Alicia, Elizabeth Murphy, and Jon Nicholl. 2008. “The Quality of Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 13(2): 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007074.
Tong, A., P. Sainsbury, and J. Craig. 2007. “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32‐item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19(6): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
Draugalis, JoLaine Reierson, and Cecilia M. Plaza. 2009. “Best Practices for Survey Research Reports Revisited: Implications of Target Population, Probability Sampling, and Response Rate.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 73(8): 142. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7308142.
Archibald, Mandy M., Rachel C. Ambagtsheer, Mavourneen G. Casey, and Michael Lawless. 2019. “Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18: 160940691987459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596.
Dollinger, Mollie, and Jessica Vanderlelie. 2021. “Closing the Loop: Co‐designing with Students for Greater Market Orientation.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 31(1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1757557.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.