Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Left-sided ICA
Rectal cancer
Robotic purse-string suture
Robotic surgery
Journal
BMC surgery
ISSN: 1471-2482
Titre abrégé: BMC Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968567
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Sep 2024
05 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
31
05
2024
accepted:
29
08
2024
medline:
6
9
2024
pubmed:
6
9
2024
entrez:
5
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes. From September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3. In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3-0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique. The matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications. The RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Robotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
From September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3. In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3-0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39237904
doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02551-8
pii: 10.1186/s12893-024-02551-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
249Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B. Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1886–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9
pubmed: 20112118
Emile SH. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy; earlier recovery, less complications, and more. Br J Surg. 2020;107:614. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11519 .
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11519
pubmed: 32187679
Provenzano D, Lo Bianco S, Zanghì G, Griggio G, Sardo F, Morici R, et al. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy A retrospective study and review of literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2022;93:229–34.
pubmed: 35476670
Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Takagi K, Hachiya H, Tago K, Shimizu T, et al. Postoperative complications associated with intra- versus extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right colectomy. Am Surg. 2022;88:2831–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348211023417 .
doi: 10.1177/00031348211023417
pubmed: 34039069
Kelley SR, Duchalais E, Larson DW. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for malignancy. J Robot Surg. 2018;12:461–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0759-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0759-0
pubmed: 29071484
Sorgato N, Mammano E, Contardo T, Vittadello F, Sarzo G, Morpurgo E. Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for cancer: a prospective comparison between robotics and laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2022;6:655–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01290- .
doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01290-
Hollandsworth HM, Li K, Zhao B, Abbadessa B, Lopez NE, Parry L, et al. Robotic left-stapled total intracorporeal bowel anastomosis versus stapled partial extracorporeal anastomosis: operative technical description and outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:3645–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09048-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09048-6
pubmed: 35061081
pmcid: 9001240
Takayama Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A, Fukami Y, Takahashi T, Uji M. A Novel Technique of Hand-Sewn Purse-String Suturing by Double Ligation Method (DLM) for Intracorporeal Circular Esophagojejunostomy. J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19:290–300. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e26 .
doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e26
pubmed: 31598372
pmcid: 6769370
Sun L, Wang W, Zhou J, Ji L, Zhao S, Fu A, et al. Modified Q-type purse-string suture duodenal stump embedding method for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. BMC Surg. 2024;24:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02423-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02423-1
pubmed: 38658911
pmcid: 11041002
Zhou H, Yu S, Wu X, Li X. Application of purse string suture pancreaticojejunostomy for undilated pancreatic duct in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg. 2022;22:195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01640-w .
doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01640-w
pubmed: 35590306
pmcid: 9118586
Shadhu K, Ramlagun D, Wang Y, Ping X, Chen T, Zhu Y, et al. Re-evaluation of purse string suture in laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:779–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06828-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06828-5
pubmed: 31087172
Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J, Mizushima T, Yamamoto H, Ikeda M, et al. Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1110–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3284-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3284-x
pubmed: 24202709
Hiraki M, Takemasa I, Uemura M, Haraguchi N, Nishimura J, Hata T, et al. Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3216–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3594-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3594-7
pubmed: 25027469
Liang H, Zhu Z, Zhang C, Zhang H, Zhang C. A safe and feasible technique: laparoscopic manual binding technique for intracorporeal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic anterior resection of high-mid rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1927–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08294-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08294-4
pubmed: 33492507
Chang YS, Wang JX, Chang DW. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. J Surg Res. 2015;195:465–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.026 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.026
pubmed: 25770742