Transforming Ethics Education Through a Faculty Learning Community: "I'm Coming Around to Seeing Ethics as Being Maybe as Important as Calculus".


Journal

Science and engineering ethics
ISSN: 1471-5546
Titre abrégé: Sci Eng Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516228

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
accepted: 13 07 2024
medline: 10 9 2024
pubmed: 10 9 2024
entrez: 9 9 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ethics is central to scientific and engineering research and practice, but a key challenge for promoting students' ethical formation involves enhancing faculty members' ability and confidence in embedding positive ethical learning experiences into their curriculums. To this end, this paper explores changes in faculty members' approaches to and perceptions of ethics education following their participation in a multi-year interdisciplinary faculty learning community (FLC). We conducted and thematically analyzed semi-structured interviews with 11 participants following the second year of the FLC. Qualitative themes suggested that, following two years of FLC participation, faculty members (1) were better able to articulate their conceptualizations of ethics; (2) became cognizant of how personal experiences, views, and beliefs informed how they introduced ethics into their curriculum; and (3) developed and lived instructional principles that guided their ethics teaching. Results thus suggested that faculty members benefitted from exploring, discussing, and teaching ethics, which (in turn) enabled them to see new opportunities and become confident in integrating ethics into their courses in meaningful ways that aligned with their scholarly identities. Taken together, these data suggest faculty became agents of change for designing, implementing, and refining ethics-related instructional efforts in STEM. This work can guide others interested in designing faculty learning communities to promote instructional skill development, faculty members' awareness of their ethical values, and their ability and agency to design and integrate ethics learning activities alongside departmental peers in an intentional and continuous manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39251460
doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00503-2
pii: 10.1007/s11948-024-00503-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

40

Subventions

Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : 1737157

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

ABET (n.d.). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022–2023. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ .
Anderson, E. (2008). Dewey’s moral philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.
Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1, 25–48.
doi: 10.57186/jalhe_2009_v1a2p25-48
Association of American Colleges and Universities (n.d.) Ethical reasoning value rubric. https://www.aacu.org/initiatives/value-initiative/value-rubrics/value-rubrics-ethical-reasoning .
Bird, S. Socially responsible science is more than good science. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.870 .
Blalock, A. E. (2019). How forms of capital shape the teaching practices of women in fixed-term faculty positions. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bringle, R. G., Games, R., Foos, C. L., Osgood, R., & Osborne, R. (2000). Faculty fellows program enhancing integrated professional development through community service. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 882–894.
doi: 10.1177/00027640021955531
Campbell, C. M., & O’Meara, K. (2014). Faculty agency: Departmental contexts that matter in faculty careers. Research in Higher Education, 55, 49–74.
doi: 10.1007/s11162-013-9303-x
Chism, N. V. N., Palmer, M. M., & Price, M. F. (2013). Investigating faculty development for sevice learning. In P. H. Clayton, R. G. Bringle, & J. A. Hatcher (Eds.), Research on faculty and service learning (Vol. 2A, pp. 187–214). Students and Faculty.
Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 150–167
Davis, M., & Riley, K. (2008). Ethics across the graduate engineering curriculum: An experiment in teaching and assessment. Teaching Ethics, 9(1), 25–42.
doi: 10.5840/tej20089115
Dewey, J. (2008). The middle works, 1899–1924: Essays, miscellany, and reconstruction in philosophy. Southern Illinois University.
Fore, G., Nyarko, S., Hess, J. L., Coleman, M. A., Price, M. F., Sorge, B. H., & Sanders, E. A. (2024). Ethical becoming and ethical inquiry among earth sciences faculty: Case studies from a faculty learning community. Journal of Teaching Ethics. https://doi.org/10.5840/tej2024328141
Fore, G. A., & Hess, J. L. (2020). Operationalizing ethical becoming as a theoretical framework for teaching engineering design ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1353–1375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00160-w
Fore, G. A., Hess, J. L., Sorge, B., Price, M. F., Colean, M. A., Hahn, T. W., & Hatcher, J. A. (2018). An introduction to the integrated community-engaged learning and ethical reflection framework (I-CELER). Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT
Furco, A., & Moely, B. E. (2012). Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 128–153.
doi: 10.1080/00221546.2012.11777237
Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833.
doi: 10.3102/0002831217706736
Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2019). Perceived outcomes associated with engagement in and design of faculty communities of practice focused on STEM reform. Research in Higher Education, 60, 844–869.
doi: 10.1007/s11162-018-9534-y
Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
Harthshorne, C. (1970). Creative synthesis and philosophic method. Open Court.
Henning, B. G. (2008). Is there an ethics of creativity? In T. Walker & T. Moth (Eds.), Whiteheading ethics: Abstracts and papers from teh ethics section of the philosophy group at the 6th international Whitehead conference at the University of Salzburg. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. A. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 551–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6
Hess, J. L., Miller, S., Higbee, S., Fore, G., & Wallace, J. (2021). Empathy and ethical becoming in biomedical engineering education: A mixed methods study of an animal tissue harvesting laboratory. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2020.1796045
Holsapple, M. A., Sutus, J., Carpenter, D., Finelli, C., Burt, B., Ra, E., Harding, T., & Bielby, R. (2011). We can’t get no satisfaction! The relationship between students’ ethical reasoning and their satisfaction with engineering ethics education.
Jamieson, L. H., & Lohmann, J. R. (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring US engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. ASEE
Katz, A. (2019). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the state of U.S. engineering ethics education. Purdue University.
Kezar, A., & Gehrke, S. (2015). Communities of transformation and their work scaling STEM reform. Pullias Center for Higher Education.
Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, 2, 63–82
doi: 10.1037/10096-003
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). Using case studies in engineering ethics education: The case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 47–63.
doi: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1914297
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McTighe, G., & Wiggins, J. (2004). Understanding by design: Professional development workbook. ASCD.
Mitcham, C., & Englehardt, E. E. (2019). Ethics across the curriculum: Prospects for broader (and deeper) teaching and learning in research and engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1735–1762.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9797-7
Musil, C. M. (2015). Civic-rich preparation for work. Association of American Colleges & Universitie’s. Peer Review, 17(3).
Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2017). Drinking from the cosmic gourd: How Amos Tutuola can change our minds. Langaa Research & Publishing CIG.
Palmer, P. J. (1997). The heart of a teacher identity and integrity in teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 29(6), 14–21.
doi: 10.1080/00091389709602343
Palmer, P. J. (2007). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013
Peters, S. J. (2020). Democracy and higher education: Traditions and stories of civic engagement. Michigan State University Press
Price, M. F. (2018). Scholarly identity mapping (SIM), V.7, I-CELER: A reflection activity to support STEM faculty in living into their values and claiming academic identities grounded in public purpose and social responsibility. https://doi.org/10.7912/677w-4d83
Price, M. F., Coleman, M. A., Fore, G. A., Hess, J. L., Sorge, B. H., Hahn, T., Sanders, E. & Nyarko, S. C. (2023). The integrated community-engaged learning and ethical reflection (ICELER) faculty learning community curriculum: 2018-2022. Indiana University. https://doi.org/10.7912/J8EN-GB18
Price, M. F., Coleman, M. A., Fore, G. A., Hess, J. L., Sorge, B. H., Hahn, T., Sanders, E., Nyarko, S. C. & Hatcher, J. A. (2021). The integrating community engaged learning through ethical reflection (ICELER) faculty learning community theory of change and annual goals, years 1-4. NSF Grant #1737157. https://doi.org/10.7912/y85p-0623
Resnik, D. B. (2012). Ethical virtues in scientific research. Accountability in Research, 19(6), 329–343.
doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.728908
Riley, D. (2017). Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit. Engineering Studies, 9(3), 249–265.
doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
Sanders, E. A., Hess, J. L., Fore, G. A., Price, M. F., Hahn, T., & Coleman, M. (2021). WIP: Faculty members’ conceptualizations of ethics in the biomedical engineering classroom. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Lincoln, NE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637123
Sanders, E. A., Hess, J. L., Miller, S., & Higbee, S. (2022). Ethical considerations in biomedical engineering: Qualitative student perspectives from a large mid-western university. Paper presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Annual Conference, Uppsala, Sweden. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962600
Sia, S. (2008). Ethics across the curriculum: Some observations. Teaching Ethics, 9(1), 5–11.
doi: 10.5840/tej20089113
Slaton, A. E., & Pawley, A. L. (2018). The power and politics of engineering education research design: Saving the ‘Small N’. Engineering Studies, 10(2–3), 133–157.
doi: 10.1080/19378629.2018.1550785
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for ethical reasoning in liberal education. Liberal Education, 96(3).
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Weston, A. (2008). A 21st century ethical toolbox (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Whitcomb, J., Borko, H., & Liston, D. (2009). Growing talent: Promising professional development models and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109337
Whitehead, A. N. (1978 [1929]). In Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected edition, D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne (Eds.)). The Free Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Zhu, Q., & Clancy, R. F. (2023). Constructing a role ethics approach to engineering ethics education. Ethics and Education, 18(2), 216–229.
doi: 10.1080/17449642.2023.2249740

Auteurs

Justin L Hess (JL)

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. jhess@purdue.edu.

Elizabeth Sanders (E)

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Grant A Fore (G)

Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Martin Coleman (M)

Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Mary Price (M)

The Forum on Education Abroad, Warren, RI, USA.

Sammy Nyarko (S)

Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Brandon Sorge (B)

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH