A grassroots approach to peer support by the Danish Reproducibility Network.
Community building
Grassroots initiatives
Open research
Peer support
Reproducibility network
Reproducible research
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Sep 2024
10 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
31
05
2024
accepted:
23
08
2024
medline:
11
9
2024
pubmed:
11
9
2024
entrez:
10
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Danish Reproducibility Network (DKRN) is a grassroots initiative for establishing a peer-supportive reproducibility-focused academic network in Denmark. We modelled our approach on already existing national Reproducibility Networks. We consulted with researchers and research support professionals to identify the needs of the research community. Three themes emerged around policy implementation, training and the appropriate application of reproducible practices. The network aims to address these three themes in a strategic plan, which harnesses the benefits of grassroots initiatives. The mission of the DKRN is therefore to facilitate communication, peer-support, and the exchange of ideas through a network of topic and geographical nodes. The network is open to researchers and research support professionals from all career stages and disciplines. It aligns with broader international initiatives, and national institutions, positioning itself as a contributor to the Danish research ecosystem.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39256756
doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06912-7
pii: 10.1186/s13104-024-06912-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
256Subventions
Organisme : Carlsbergfondet
ID : CF23-0234
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Monya Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 2016.
Marcus RMunafò, Brian A, Nosek DVM, Bishop KS, Button CD, Chambers. Nathalie Percie Du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Jennifer J Ware, and John Ioannidis. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1(1):1–9.
Stuart Ritchie. Science fictions: exposing fraud, bias, negligence and hype in science. Random House; 2020.
Andrew J, Stewart EK, Farran JA, Grange M, Macleod M, Munafò P, Newton DR, Shanks. Institutional leads. Improving research quality: the view from the Uk reproducibility network institutional leads for research improvement. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):458.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3
Suzanne LK, Stewart CR, Pennington, Gonçalo Rda, Silva N, Ballou J, Butler Z, Dienes C, Jay S, Rossit. Anna Samara, and UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) Local Network leads. Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN local network leads. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):58.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w
Working Group on the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Danish code of conduct for research integrity. https://ufm.dk/en/publications/2014/files-2014-1/the-danish-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity.pdf , 2014.
Marcus RMunafò, Chambers C, Collins A, Fortunato L, Malcolm Macleod. The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):1–3.
UK Reproducibility Network Steering Committee. From grassroots to global: a blueprint for building a reproducibility network. PLoS Biol. 2021;19(11):e3001461.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001461
pmcid: 8608297
Kristijan Armeni L, Brinkman R, Carlsson A, Eerland R, Fijten R, Fondberg VE, Heininga S, Heunis WQ, Koh M, Masselink, et al. Towards widescale adoption of open science practices: the role of open science communities. Sci Public Policy. 2021;48(5):605–11.
doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab039
Amy Orben. A journal club to fix science. Nature. 2019;573(7775):465–6.
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
pubmed: 31551562
Marcus RMunafò, Chambers CD, Alexandra M, Collins L, Fortunato. Malcolm R Macleod. Research Culture and Reproducibility. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020;24(2):91–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002
UNESCO. Unesco recommendation on open science. https://www.unesco.org/en/open-science/ , 2023.
Coalition S. Accelerating the tansition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. https://www.crkn-rcdr.ca/sites/crkn/files/2018-10/Plan_S.pdf . 2018.
Wellcome Trust. Data, software and materials management and sharing policy. 2017. https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/data-software-materials-management-and-sharing-policy
Uddannelses og Forskningsministeriet. Ærlighed, gennemsigtighed og ansvarlighed skal gøre forskning reproducerbar og troværdig. https://ufm.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/2017/begreber-som-aerlighed-gennemsigtighed-og-ansvarlighed-er-afgorende-i-en-tid-hvor-flere-taler-om-forskningens-reproducerbarhedskrise , 2017.
Uddannelses og Forskningsministeriet. Denmark’s national strategy for open access. https://ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/cooperation-between-research-and-innovation/open-access/Publications/denmarks-national-strategy-for-open-access/national-strategy-for-open-access-english.pdf , 2018.
Danish National Research Foundation. Open access policy. https://dg.dk/en/open-access-policy/ , 2019.
Working Group on the Danish National Open Access Strategy. Evaluation of Denmark’s national strategy for open access (danish). https://ufm.dk/publikationer/2024/evaluering-af-danmarks-nationale-open-access-strategi , 2024.
COaRA. Agreement on performing research assessment. https://coara.eu/app/uploads/2022/09/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf , 2022.
DeiC. National strategy for data management based on the fair principles. https://www.deic.dk/sites/default/files/documents/PDF/EN_National%20strategi%20for%20data%20management%20baseret%20p%C3%A5%20FAIR-principper.pdf , 2021.
COS. The open research lifecycle. https://www.cos.io/blog/the-open-research-lifecycle , 2022.
Michelle Barker and Neil Chue Hong. Approaches to scaling up reproducibility in research organisations, March 2024.
Brand A, Allen L, Altman M, Hlava M, Scott J. Beyond authorship: attri-bution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learn Publish. 2015;28(2):151–5.
doi: 10.1087/20150211