Management of Fluid Overload in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (EASE-TAVR): A Randomized Controlled Trial.


Journal

JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 12 05 2024
revised: 14 06 2024
accepted: 18 06 2024
medline: 12 9 2024
pubmed: 12 9 2024
entrez: 11 9 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001). In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS METHODS
This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.
RESULTS RESULTS
The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).

Identifiants

pubmed: 39260962
pii: S1936-8798(24)00915-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.06.022
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04556123']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2054-2066

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Austrian Society of Cardiology. Dr Dannenberg has received consulting fees from Abbott; and has received educational grants from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kammerlander has received speaker fees from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received advisory board honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received research grants from Pfizer. Dr Hengstenberg has received proctoring/speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic). Dr Mascherbauer has received proctor fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Shockwave Medical; and has received educational grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nitsche has received speaker fees/institutional research grants from Pfizer; and has received advisory board honoraria from Prothena). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Auteurs

Kseniya Halavina (K)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Matthias Koschutnik (M)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Carolina Donà (C)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Maximilian Autherith (M)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Fabian Petric (F)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Anna Röckel (A)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Georg Spinka (G)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Daryush Danesh (D)

Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.

Jürgen Puchinger (J)

Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.

Martin Wiesholzer (M)

Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.

Katharina Mascherbauer (K)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gregor Heitzinger (G)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Varius Dannenberg (V)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Sophia Koschatko (S)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Charlotte Jantsch (C)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Max-Paul Winter (MP)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Georg Goliasch (G)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Andreas A Kammerlander (AA)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Philipp E Bartko (PE)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Christian Hengstenberg (C)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Julia Mascherbauer (J)

Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.

Christian Nitsche (C)

Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christian.nitsche@meduniwien.ac.at.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH