Management of Fluid Overload in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (EASE-TAVR): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Humans
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ physiopathology
Female
Male
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ adverse effects
Quality of Life
Treatment Outcome
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Severity of Illness Index
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Heart Failure
/ physiopathology
Dielectric Spectroscopy
Water-Electrolyte Imbalance
/ physiopathology
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Predictive Value of Tests
Recovery of Function
Prospective Studies
TAVR
cardiac decompensation
congestion
outcome
volume status
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Sep 2024
09 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
12
05
2024
revised:
14
06
2024
accepted:
18
06
2024
medline:
12
9
2024
pubmed:
12
9
2024
entrez:
11
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001). In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS
METHODS
This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39260962
pii: S1936-8798(24)00915-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.06.022
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04556123']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2054-2066Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Austrian Society of Cardiology. Dr Dannenberg has received consulting fees from Abbott; and has received educational grants from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kammerlander has received speaker fees from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim; has received advisory board honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; and has received research grants from Pfizer. Dr Hengstenberg has received proctoring/speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received institutional research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic). Dr Mascherbauer has received proctor fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences; has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Shockwave Medical; and has received educational grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Nitsche has received speaker fees/institutional research grants from Pfizer; and has received advisory board honoraria from Prothena). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.