Chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle correction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Chevron osteotomy
Complication
Hallux valgus
Hallux valgus angle
Intermetatarsal angle
Scarf osteotomy
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Sep 2024
14 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
19
07
2024
accepted:
16
08
2024
medline:
14
9
2024
pubmed:
14
9
2024
entrez:
13
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the differences in hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complication rates between chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for correcting hallux valgus. Two investigators independently searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2007 to 2018 on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Next, chevron and scarf osteotomies were compared for their postoperative outcomes using HVA, IMA, and AOFAS scores and their complication rates. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). Six RCTs-comprising 507 feet, of which 261 and 246 underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies, respectively-were included. The meta-analysis revealed that chevron osteotomy led to significantly smaller postoperative HVAs than scarf osteotomy (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.94, 95% CI = - 2.65 to - 1.29, P < .00001). However, the differences in postoperative IMA (WMD = - 0.44, 95% CI = - 1.10 to 0.22, P = .19), postoperative AOFAS scores (WMD = 0.75; 95% CI = - 5.32 to 6.82; P = .81), and complication rates (risk ratio = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.65-2.27, P = .53) between feet that underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies were nonsignificant. Compared with scarf osteotomy, chevron osteotomy had significantly more favorable postoperative outcomes in terms of HVA correction, but not in terms of IMA, AOFAS scores, or complication rates. Level I, systemic review and meta-analysis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the differences in hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and complication rates between chevron osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for correcting hallux valgus.
METHODS
METHODS
Two investigators independently searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2007 to 2018 on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Next, chevron and scarf osteotomies were compared for their postoperative outcomes using HVA, IMA, and AOFAS scores and their complication rates. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Six RCTs-comprising 507 feet, of which 261 and 246 underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies, respectively-were included. The meta-analysis revealed that chevron osteotomy led to significantly smaller postoperative HVAs than scarf osteotomy (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.94, 95% CI = - 2.65 to - 1.29, P < .00001). However, the differences in postoperative IMA (WMD = - 0.44, 95% CI = - 1.10 to 0.22, P = .19), postoperative AOFAS scores (WMD = 0.75; 95% CI = - 5.32 to 6.82; P = .81), and complication rates (risk ratio = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.65-2.27, P = .53) between feet that underwent chevron and scarf osteotomies were nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with scarf osteotomy, chevron osteotomy had significantly more favorable postoperative outcomes in terms of HVA correction, but not in terms of IMA, AOFAS scores, or complication rates.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Level I, systemic review and meta-analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39272201
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05007-0
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-05007-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
566Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in the General Population: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3(21).
Wagner E. Osteotomy considerations in Hallux Valgus Treatment: improving the correction power. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(3):481–98.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2012.06.007
pubmed: 22938646
Bia A, Guerra-Pinto F, Pereira BS, Corte-Real N. XM. O. Percutaneous Osteotomies in Hallux Valgus: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57(1):123–30.
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.06.027
pubmed: 28870735
Trnka HJ, Zembsch A, Easley ME, Salzer M, Ritschl P. MS. M. The Chevron Osteotomy for correction of Hallux Valgus. Comparison of findings after two and five years of Follow-Up. J Bone Joint Surg Am.82(19):1373–8.
Smith SE, Landorf KB, Butterworth PA. Scarf Versus Chevron Osteotomy for the correction of 1–2 intermetatarsal Angle in Hallux Valgus: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(4):437–44.
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.02.016
pubmed: 22487651
Fakoor M, Sarafan N, Mohammadhoseini P. e. comparison of clinical outcomes of scarf and chevron osteotomies and the McBride procedure in the treatment of hallux valgus deformity. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014;2(1):31–6.
pubmed: 25207310
pmcid: 4151428
Adam SP, Choung SC, Gu Y. Outcomes after scarf osteotomy for treatment of adult Hallux Valgus deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):854–9.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1510-6
pubmed: 20706810
Deenik AR, Pilot P, Brandt SE, van Mameren H, Geesink RGT. Scarf Versus Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus: a Randomized Controlled Trial in 96 patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(5):537–41.
doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0537
pubmed: 17559759
Mahadevan DLS, Hepple S, et al. Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(2):109–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.05.012
pubmed: 27301730
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;8(7):e1000100.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
doi: 10.1002/9780470712184
Deenik A, van Mameren H. dV. Equivalent correction in Scarf and Chevron Osteotomy in moderate and severe Hallux Valgus: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(12):1209–15.
doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.1209
pubmed: 19138485
Lee MWJ, Smith MM, et al. Hallux Valgus correction comparing Percutaneous Chevron/Akin (PECA) and Open Scarf/Akin Osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(8):838–46.
doi: 10.1177/1071100717704941
pubmed: 28476096
Jeuken RMSM, Kort NP, et al. Long-term follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial comparing scarf to Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus correction. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(7):687–95.
doi: 10.1177/1071100716639574
pubmed: 27009063
Elshazly O, Abdel Rahman AF, Fahmy H. al. e. scarf versus long chevron osteotomies for the treatment of hallux valgus: a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(4):469–77.
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.017
pubmed: 30321962
Ma Q, Liang X. Chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: a meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(6):755–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.09.003
pubmed: 30391038
Schneider W, Aigner N, Pinggera O. Chevron Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus. Ten-year results of 112 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(7):1016–20.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B7.15108
pubmed: 15446530
van Groningen B, van der Steen MC, Reijman M, Bos J. Outcomes in chevron osteotomy for Hallux Valgus in a large cohort. Foot. 2016;29:18–24.
doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2016.09.002
pubmed: 27888787
Maffulli N, Longo UG, Oliva F, Denaro V, Coppola C. Bosch osteotomy and scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;4–(4):525–4.
Sammarco GJ, Idusuyi OB. Complications after surgery of the hallux. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:59–71.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200110000-00008
Loveday DT, Barr LV, Loizou CL, Barton G, Smith G. Cost effectiveness of different techniques in hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;22(4):259–64.
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.11.004