Growth rate as a link between microbial diversity and soil biogeochemistry.
Journal
Nature ecology & evolution
ISSN: 2397-334X
Titre abrégé: Nat Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698577
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Sep 2024
18 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
25
10
2023
accepted:
25
07
2024
medline:
19
9
2024
pubmed:
19
9
2024
entrez:
18
9
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Measuring the growth rate of a microorganism is a simple yet profound way to quantify its effect on the world. The absolute growth rate of a microbial population reflects rates of resource assimilation, biomass production and element transformation-some of the many ways in which organisms affect Earth's ecosystems and climate. Microbial fitness in the environment depends on the ability to reproduce quickly when conditions are favourable and adopt a survival physiology when conditions worsen, which cells coordinate by adjusting their relative growth rate. At the population level, relative growth rate is a sensitive metric of fitness, linking survival and reproduction to the ecology and evolution of populations. Techniques combining omics and stable isotope probing enable sensitive measurements of the growth rates of microbial assemblages and individual taxa in soil. Microbial ecologists can explore how the growth rates of taxa with known traits and evolutionary histories respond to changes in resource availability, environmental conditions and interactions with other organisms. We anticipate that quantitative and scalable data on the growth rates of soil microorganisms, coupled with measurements of biogeochemical fluxes, will allow scientists to test and refine ecological theory and advance process-based models of carbon flux, nutrient uptake and ecosystem productivity. Measurements of in situ microbial growth rates provide insights into the ecology of populations and can be used to quantitatively link microbial diversity to soil biogeochemistry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39294403
doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02520-7
pii: 10.1038/s41559-024-02520-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : LLNL 'Microbes Persist' Soil Microbiome Scientific Focus Area SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : Science Graduate Student Research
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0023126
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0023126
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0023126
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SC0016207
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0023126
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0020172
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : DE-SC0023126
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
ID : SCW1632
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 2114570
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 1643871
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : AW5809-826664
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Holmes, D. E. et al. Metatranscriptomic evidence for direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter and Methanothrix species in methanogenic rice paddy soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e00223-17 (2017).
pubmed: 28258137
pmcid: 5394310
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00223-17
Elser, J. J. et al. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 3, 540–550 (2000).
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.x
Wang, Y., Law, R. & Pak, B. A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere. Biogeosciences 7, 2261–2282 (2010).
doi: 10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010
Tang, K., Baskaran, V. & Nemati, M. Bacteria of the sulphur cycle: an overview of microbiology, biokinetics and their role in petroleum and mining industries. Biochem. Eng. J. 44, 73–94 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.12.011
Hobbie, S. E. & Vitousek, P. M. Nutrient limitation of decomposition in Hawaiian forests. Ecology 81, 1867–1877 (2000).
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1867:NLODIH]2.0.CO;2
Bremer, H. & Dennis, P. P. Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell at different exponential growth rates. EcoSal Plus 3, https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosal.5.2.3 (2008).
King, T., Ishihama, A., Kori, A. & Ferenci, T. A regulatory trade-off as a source of strain variation in the species Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 186, 5614–5620 (2004).
pubmed: 15317765
pmcid: 516835
doi: 10.1128/JB.186.17.5614-5620.2004
Bergkessel, M., Basta, D. W. & Newman, D. K. The physiology of growth arrest: uniting molecular and environmental microbiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 549–562 (2016).
pubmed: 27510862
pmcid: 10069271
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.107
Cooper, T. F., Rozen, D. E. & Lenski, R. E. Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1072–1077 (2003).
pubmed: 12538876
pmcid: 298728
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0334340100
Peyraud, R., Cottret, L., Marmiesse, L., Gouzy, J. & Genin, S. A resource allocation trade-off between virulence and proliferation drives metabolic versatility in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005939 (2016).
pubmed: 27732672
pmcid: 5061431
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005939
Martínez-García, E., Nikel, P. I., Chavarría, M. & de Lorenzo, V. The metabolic cost of flagellar motion in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 291–303 (2014).
pubmed: 24148021
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12309
Notley-McRobb, L., King, T. & Ferenci, T. rpoS mutations and loss of general stress resistance in Escherichia coli populations as a consequence of conflict between competing stress responses. J. Bacteriol. 184, 806–811 (2002).
pubmed: 11790751
pmcid: 139526
doi: 10.1128/JB.184.3.806-811.2002
Biselli, E., Schink, S. J. & Gerland, U. Slower growth of Escherichia coli leads to longer survival in carbon starvation due to a decrease in the maintenance rate. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9478 (2020).
pubmed: 32500952
pmcid: 7273699
doi: 10.15252/msb.20209478
Shapiro, J. W. & Turner, P. E. Evolution of mutualism from parasitism in experimental virus populations. Evolution 72, 707–712 (2018).
pubmed: 29380361
doi: 10.1111/evo.13440
Hestrin, R. et al. Plant-associated fungi support bacterial resilience following water limitation. ISME J. 16, 2752–2762 (2022).
pubmed: 36085516
pmcid: 9666503
doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01308-6
Caro, T. A., McFarlin, J., Jech, S., Fierer, N. & Kopf, S. Hydrogen stable isotope probing of lipids demonstrates slow rates of microbial growth in soil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2211625120 (2023).
pubmed: 37036980
pmcid: 10120080
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211625120
Stone, B. W. et al. Nutrients cause consolidation of soil carbon flux to small proportion of bacterial community. Nat. Commun. 12, 3381 (2021).
pubmed: 34099669
pmcid: 8184982
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x
Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M. & Schmidt, T. M. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1328–1333 (2000).
pubmed: 10742207
pmcid: 91988
doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1328-1333.2000
Eichorst, S. A., Breznak, J. A. & Schmidt, T. M. Isolation and characterization of soil bacteria that define Terriglobus gen. nov., in the phylum Acidobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2708–2717 (2007).
pubmed: 17293520
pmcid: 1855589
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02140-06
Nannipieri, P., Johnson, R. & Paul, E. Criteria for measurement of microbial growth and activity in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 223–229 (1978).
doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(78)90100-1
Paul, E. A. & Juma, N. G. Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen by microorganisms.Ecol. Bull. 33, 179–195 (1981).
Avery, S. V., Harwood, J. L. & Lloyd, D. Quantification and characterization of phagocytosis in the soil amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii by flow cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1124–1132 (1995).
pubmed: 16534962
pmcid: 1388394
doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.1124-1132.1995
Okano, Y. et al. Application of real-time PCR to study effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1008–1016 (2004).
pubmed: 14766583
pmcid: 348910
doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1008-1016.2004
Demoling, F., Figueroa, D. & Bååth, E. Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39, 2485–2495 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.05.002
Paustian, K. et al. Climate-smart soils. Nature 532, 49–57 (2016).
pubmed: 27078564
doi: 10.1038/nature17174
Amobonye, A., Bhagwat, P., Singh, S. & Pillai, S. Plastic biodegradation: frontline microbes and their enzymes. Sci. Total Environ. 759, 143536 (2021).
pubmed: 33190901
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143536
Minasny, B. et al. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292, 59–86 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
Hungate, B. A. et al. Quantitative microbial ecology through stable isotope probing. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 81, 7570–7581 (2015).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02280-15
Brown, C. T., Olm, M. R., Thomas, B. C. & Banfield, J. F. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1256–1263 (2016).
pubmed: 27819664
pmcid: 5538567
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3704
Caro, T.A. et al. Single-cell measurement of microbial growth rate with Raman microspectroscopy. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiae110 (2024).
Meredith, L. K. et al. Consumption of atmospheric hydrogen during the life cycle of soil‐dwelling actinobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6, 226–238 (2014).
pubmed: 24983527
doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12116
Pii, Y. et al. Microbial interactions in the rhizosphere: beneficial influences of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on nutrient acquisition process. A review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51, 403–415 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-0996-1
Coban, O., De Deyn, G. B. & van der Ploeg, M. Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands. Science 375, abe0725 (2022).
pubmed: 35239372
doi: 10.1126/science.abe0725
Rousk, J. & Bååth, E. Growth of saprotrophic fungi and bacteria in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 78, 17–30 (2011).
pubmed: 21470255
doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01106.x
Schnecker, J. et al. Seasonal dynamics of soil microbial growth, respiration, biomass, and carbon use efficiency in temperate soils. Geoderma 440, 116693 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116693
Kalanetra, K. M., Joye, S. B., Sunseri, N. R. & Nelson, D. C. Novel vacuolate sulfur bacteria from the Gulf of Mexico reproduce by reductive division in three dimensions. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1451–1460 (2005).
pubmed: 16104867
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00832.x
Hood, M. A., Guckert, J. B., White, D. C. & Deck, F. Effect of nutrient deprivation on lipid, carbohydrate, DNA, RNA, and protein levels in Vibrio cholerae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 788–793 (1986).
pubmed: 2430523
pmcid: 239115
doi: 10.1128/aem.52.4.788-793.1986
Spohn, M., Klaus, K., Wanek, W. & Richter, A. Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth—implications for carbon cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 96, 74–81 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.016
Bååth, E. Measurement of protein synthesis by soil bacterial assemblages with the leucine incorporation technique. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17, 147–153 (1994).
doi: 10.1007/BF00337747
Soares, M. & Rousk, J. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biol. Biochem. 131, 195–205 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.010
Mumy, K. L. & Findlay, R. H. Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 57, 259–268 (2004).
pubmed: 15063066
doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.01.013
Koch, B. J. et al. Estimating taxon-specific population dynamics in diverse microbial communities. Ecosphere 9, e02090 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2090
Kirchman, D. Growth rates of microbes in the oceans. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 285–309 (2015).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-122414-033938
Gibson, B., Wilson, D. J., Feil, E. & Eyre-Walker, A. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 20180789 (2018).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0789
Liu, W. et al. Active phoD-harboring bacteria are enriched by long-term organic fertilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 152, 108071 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108071
Dong, W. et al. Linking microbial taxa and the effect of mineral nitrogen forms on residue decomposition at the early stage in arable soil by DNA-qSIP. Geoderma 400, 115127 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115127
Li, J. et al. Predictive genomic traits for bacterial growth in culture versus actual growth in soil. ISME J. 13, 2162–2172 (2019).
pubmed: 31053828
pmcid: 6776108
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0422-z
Wang, C. et al. The temperature sensitivity of soil: microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization. ISME J. 15, 2738–2747 (2021).
pubmed: 33782569
pmcid: 8397749
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00959-1
Purcell, A. M. et al. Decreased growth of wild soil microbes after 15 years of transplant‐induced warming in a montane meadow. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 128–139 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.15911
Bell, S. L. et al. Effects of warming on bacterial growth rates in a peat soil under ambient and elevated CO
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108933
Propster, J. R. et al. Distinct growth responses of tundra soil bacteria to short-term and long-term warming. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 0, e01543-22 (2023).
doi: 10.1128/aem.01543-22
Blazewicz, S. J. et al. Taxon-specific microbial growth and mortality patterns reveal distinct temporal population responses to rewetting in a California grassland soil. ISME J. 14, 1520–1532 (2020).
pubmed: 32203117
pmcid: 7242442
doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0617-3
Dove, N. C., Taş, N. & Hart, S. C. Ecological and genomic responses of soil microbiomes to high-severity wildfire: linking community assembly to functional potential. ISME J. 16, 1853–1863 (2022).
pubmed: 35430593
pmcid: 9213548
doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01232-9
Nelson, A. R. et al. Wildfire-dependent changes in soil microbiome diversity and function. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1419–1430 (2022).
pubmed: 36008619
pmcid: 9418001
doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01203-y
Finley, B. K. et al. Soil minerals affect taxon-specific bacterial growth. ISME J. 16, 1318–1326 (2022).
pubmed: 34931028
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01162-y
Chase, A. B., Weihe, C. & Martiny, J. B. H. Adaptive differentiation and rapid evolution of a soil bacterium along a climate gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101254118 (2021).
pubmed: 33906949
pmcid: 8106337
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101254118
Foley, M. M. et al. Active populations and growth of soil microorganisms are framed by mean annual precipitation in three California annual grasslands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 177, 108886 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108886
Morrissey, E. M. et al. Taxonomic patterns in the nitrogen assimilation of soil prokaryotes. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 1112–1119 (2018).
pubmed: 29411496
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14051
Starr, E. P. et al. Stable-isotope-informed, genome-resolved metagenomics uncovers potential cross-kingdom interactions in rhizosphere soil. mSphere 6, e0008521 (2021).
pubmed: 34468166
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00085-21
Hungate, B. A. et al. The functional significance of bacterial predators. Mbio 12, e00466-21 (2021).
pubmed: 33906922
pmcid: 8092244
doi: 10.1128/mBio.00466-21
Mielke, L. et al. Nematode grazing increases the allocation of plant-derived carbon to soil bacteria and saprophytic fungi, and activates bacterial species of the rhizosphere. Pedobiologia 90, 150787 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2021.150787
Morrissey, E. M. et al. Evolutionary history constrains microbial traits across environmental variation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1064–1069 (2019).
pubmed: 31209289
doi: 10.1038/s41559-019-0918-y
Ruan, Y. et al. Elevated temperature and CO
pubmed: 36693873
pmcid: 9873651
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36086-y
Stone, B. W. et al. Nutrients strengthen density dependence of per-capita growth and mortality rates in the soil bacterial community. Oecologia 201, 771–782 (2023).
pubmed: 36847885
doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05322-z
Stone, B. W. G. et al. Life history strategies among soil bacteria—dichotomy for few, continuum for many. ISME J. 17, 611–619 (2023).
pubmed: 36732614
pmcid: 10030646
doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01354-0
Morrissey, E. M. et al. Carbon acquisition ecological strategies to connect soil microbial biodiversity and carbon cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 177, 108893 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108893
Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 35–46 (2020).
pubmed: 31586158
doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7
Sokol, N. W. et al. The path from root input to mineral-associated soil carbon is dictated by habitat-specific microbial traits and soil moisture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 193, 109367 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109367
Rudgers, J. A. et al. Climate disruption of plant–microbe interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 51, 561–586 (2020).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-090819
Bradford, M. A. et al. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 751–758 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3071
Schmidt, M. W. I. et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478, 49–56 (2011).
pubmed: 21979045
doi: 10.1038/nature10386
Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. & Simpson, M. J. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 156, 108189 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108189
Ludwig, M. et al. Microbial contribution to SOM quantity and quality in density fractions of temperate arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 81, 311–322 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.12.002
Chang, Y. et al. A stoichiometric approach to estimate sources of mineral-associated soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17092 (2024).
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17092
Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D. & Grandy, A. S. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nat. Commun. 7, 13630 (2016).
pubmed: 27892466
pmcid: 5133697
doi: 10.1038/ncomms13630
Pold, G. et al. Carbon use efficiency and its temperature sensitivity covary in soil bacteria. mBio 11, e02293-19 (2020).
pubmed: 31964725
pmcid: 6974560
doi: 10.1128/mBio.02293-19
Marschmann, G. L. et al. Predictions of rhizosphere microbiome dynamics with a genome-informed and trait-based energy budget model. Nat. Microbiol. 9, 421–433 (2024).
pubmed: 38316928
pmcid: 10847045
doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01582-w
Wieder, W., Grandy, S., Kallenbach, C., Bonan, B. & Integrating, G. Microbial physiology and physiochemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model. Biogeosciences 11, 3899–3917 (2014).
doi: 10.5194/bg-11-3899-2014
Wang, G. et al. Microbial dormancy improves development and experimental validation of ecosystem model. ISME J. 9, 226–237 (2015).
pubmed: 25012899
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.120
Tang, J. & Riley, W. J. Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 56–60 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2438
Sulman, B. N., Phillips, R. P., Oishi, A. C., Shevliakova, E. & Pacala, S. W. Microbe-driven turnover offsets mineral-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2436
Georgiou, K., Abramoff, R. Z., Harte, J., Riley, W. J. & Torn, M. S. Microbial community-level regulation explains soil carbon responses to long-term litter manipulations. Nat. Commun. 8, 1223 (2017).
pubmed: 29089496
pmcid: 5663850
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01116-z
Tao, F. et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage. Nature 618, 981–985 (2023).
pubmed: 37225998
pmcid: 10307633
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06042-3
Malik, A. A. et al. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. ISME J. 14, 1–9 (2020).
pubmed: 31554911
doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0510-0
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A. & Jackson, R. B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88, 1354–1364 (2007).
pubmed: 17601128
doi: 10.1890/05-1839
Westoby, M. et al. Trait dimensions in bacteria and archaea compared to vascular plants. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1487–1504 (2021).
pubmed: 33896087
doi: 10.1111/ele.13742
Prosser, J. I. & Martiny, J. B. H. Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190241 (2020).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0241
Malik, A. A. et al. Drought and plant litter chemistry alter microbial gene expression and metabolite production. ISME J. 14, 2236–2247 (2020).
pubmed: 32444813
pmcid: 7608424
doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0683-6
Sokol, N. W. et al. Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 415–430 (2022).
pubmed: 35228712
doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z
Bonkowski, M. Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. New Phytol. 162, 617–631 (2004).
pubmed: 33873756
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01066.x
Wilhelm, R. C., Singh, R., Eltis, L. D. & Mohn, W. W. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 13, 413–429 (2019).
pubmed: 30258172
doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0279-6
Blanchet, F. G., Cazelles, K. & Gravel, D. Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1050–1063 (2020).
pubmed: 32429003
doi: 10.1111/ele.13525
Rousk, J. Biomass or growth? How to measure soil food webs to understand structure and function. Soil Biol. Biochem. 102, 45–47 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.001
Maxfield, P. J., Dildar, N., Hornibrook, E. R. C., Stott, A. W. & Evershed, R. P. Stable isotope switching (SIS): a new stable isotope probing (SIP) approach to determine carbon flow in the soil food web and dynamics in organic matter pools. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 26, 997–1004 (2012).
pubmed: 22396038
doi: 10.1002/rcm.6172
DeRito, C. M., Pumphrey, G. M. & Madsen, E. L. Use of field-based stable isotope probing to identify adapted populations and track carbon flow through a phenol-degrading soil microbial community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 7858–7865 (2005).
pubmed: 16332760
pmcid: 1317415
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7858-7865.2005
Maxfield, P. J., Hornibrook, E. R. C. & Evershed, R. P. Estimating high-affinity methanotrophic bacterial biomass, growth, and turnover in soil by phospholipid fatty acid
pubmed: 16751495
pmcid: 1489670
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02779-05
Lueders, T., Pommerenke, B. & Friedrich, M. W. Stable-isotope probing of microorganisms thriving at thermodynamic limits: syntrophic propionate oxidation in flooded soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 5778–5786 (2004).
pubmed: 15466514
pmcid: 522077
doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.5778-5786.2004
Vogt, C. et al. Stable isotope probing approaches to study anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation and degraders. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 195–210 (2016).
pubmed: 26959525
Li, Z. et al. Genome-resolved proteomic stable isotope probing of soil microbial communities using
pubmed: 31866955
pmcid: 6908837
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02706
Morris, S. A., Radajewski, S., Willison, T. W. & Murrell, J. C. Identification of the functionally active methanotroph population in a peat soil microcosm by stable-isotope probing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1446–1453 (2002).
pubmed: 11872500
pmcid: 123758
doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1446-1453.2002