Informed consent and coercion in recruitment advertisements for oocyte donors.
Egg donation
IVF
Infertility
Informed consent
Oocyte donors
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Sep 2024
20 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
13
09
2023
accepted:
09
08
2024
medline:
20
9
2024
pubmed:
20
9
2024
entrez:
19
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As the use of donor eggs for in vitro treatment has increased, both medically affiliated and private donor egg agencies have turned to online advertisements to recruit donors. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine provides recommendations encouraging ethical recruitment of donors, however there is no formal regulation for the informed consent process for egg donor recruitment and compensation. Underrepresentation of risks and targeted financial incentives may pose a risk to the informed consent process. Data from online advertisements for egg donors active between January 1 - August 31, 2020, were collected to analyze content related to risks, Covid-19 precautions, donor payment, and desired donor characteristics. Advertisements for egg donors on Google, Craigslist, and social media were analyzed. Primary outcomes included the mention of the risks of egg donation, including the risk of Covid-19 exposure, in donor egg advertisements. Secondary outcomes included language targeting specific donor characteristics and financial compensation. 103 advertisements were included. 35.9% (37/103) of advertisements mentioned some risk of the egg donation process, and 18.5% (19/103) mentioned risks or precautions related to Covid-19 exposure. Of advertisements for private donor egg agencies, 40.7% (24/59) mentioned any risk, compared to 29.6% (13/44) of medically affiliated egg donation programs; the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.24). Agencies targeting students and donors of a specific race were more likely to offer payments over $10,000 for an egg donation cycle. Among advertisements offering over $20,000 for donor compensation, 72.7% (8/11) recruited women under the age of 21. Egg donor recruitment advertisements, for both medically affiliated programs and private agencies, were unlikely to mention risks including the risk of exposure to Covid-19. Non-medically affiliated private donor egg agencies were more likely to violate multiple American Society for Reproductive Medicine ethics guidelines, including offering higher than average compensation, and recruiting donors from young and vulnerable populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As the use of donor eggs for in vitro treatment has increased, both medically affiliated and private donor egg agencies have turned to online advertisements to recruit donors. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine provides recommendations encouraging ethical recruitment of donors, however there is no formal regulation for the informed consent process for egg donor recruitment and compensation. Underrepresentation of risks and targeted financial incentives may pose a risk to the informed consent process.
METHODS
METHODS
Data from online advertisements for egg donors active between January 1 - August 31, 2020, were collected to analyze content related to risks, Covid-19 precautions, donor payment, and desired donor characteristics. Advertisements for egg donors on Google, Craigslist, and social media were analyzed. Primary outcomes included the mention of the risks of egg donation, including the risk of Covid-19 exposure, in donor egg advertisements. Secondary outcomes included language targeting specific donor characteristics and financial compensation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
103 advertisements were included. 35.9% (37/103) of advertisements mentioned some risk of the egg donation process, and 18.5% (19/103) mentioned risks or precautions related to Covid-19 exposure. Of advertisements for private donor egg agencies, 40.7% (24/59) mentioned any risk, compared to 29.6% (13/44) of medically affiliated egg donation programs; the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.24). Agencies targeting students and donors of a specific race were more likely to offer payments over $10,000 for an egg donation cycle. Among advertisements offering over $20,000 for donor compensation, 72.7% (8/11) recruited women under the age of 21.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Egg donor recruitment advertisements, for both medically affiliated programs and private agencies, were unlikely to mention risks including the risk of exposure to Covid-19. Non-medically affiliated private donor egg agencies were more likely to violate multiple American Society for Reproductive Medicine ethics guidelines, including offering higher than average compensation, and recruiting donors from young and vulnerable populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39300511
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03302-w
pii: 10.1186/s12905-024-03302-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
526Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) DataART: Clinic Information | DRH | CDC. Accessed August 14. 2023. https://nccd.cdc.gov/drh_art/rdPage.aspx
Lafuente-Funes S, Weis C, Hudson N, Provoost V. Egg donation in the age of vitrification: a study of egg providers’ perceptions and experiences in the UK, Belgium and Spain. Sociol Health Illn. 2023;45(2):259–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13590 .
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13590
pubmed: 36444136
Daar J, Benward J, Collins L, et al. Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):e15–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.040 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.040
Marshall L. Ethical issues in the Evolving Realm of Egg Donation. In: Francis L, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics. Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 0. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981878.013.21 .
Bodri D, Guillén JJ, Polo A, Trullenque M, Esteve C, Coll O. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(2):237–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60200-3 .
doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60200-3
pubmed: 18681998
Tober D, Garibaldi C, Blair A, Baltzell K. Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed? Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2021;12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003
pubmed: 33024845
Cahn N, Collins J. Fully informed consent for prospective Egg donors. AMA J Ethics. 2014;16(1):49–56.
doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.1.hlaw2-1401
Krawiec KD. Egg-Donor price fixing and Kamakahi v. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. AMA J Ethics. 2014;16(1):57–62.
doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.1.pfor1-1401
Alberta HB, Berry RM, Levine AD. Compliance with donor age recommendations in oocyte donor recruitment advertisements in the USA. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(4):400–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.011
pubmed: 23337419
Alberta HB, Berry RM, Levine AD. Risk Disclosure and the recruitment of Oocyte donors: are advertisers telling the full story? J Law Med Ethics. 2014;42(2):232–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12138 .
doi: 10.1111/jlme.12138
pubmed: 25040386
Gurmankin AD. Risk information provided to Prospective Oocyte Donors in a preliminary phone call. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1(4):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/152651601317139207 .
doi: 10.1162/152651601317139207
pubmed: 11954633
Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):455–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081
pubmed: 19022427
V RA. Facebook Acquisitions – The Complete List (2021)! [Infographic] | TechWyse ‘Rise To The Top’ Blog. https://www.techwyse.com . Published August 12, 2021. Accessed August 14, 2023. https://www.techwyse.com/blog/infographics/facebook-acquisitions-the-complete-list-infographic/
Keehn J, Howell E, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. How agencies Market Egg Donation on the internet: a qualitative study. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(3):610–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12303 .
doi: 10.1111/jlme.12303
pubmed: 26479570
pmcid: 4663984
Informing offspring of their. Conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028
Freeman T. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: an overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015;33(1):45–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0018-y .
doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0018-y
pubmed: 25743051
pmcid: 4900443
Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19(4):769–89.
pubmed: 22908619
Schuchat A. Public Health Response to the Initiation and Spread of Pandemic COVID-19 in the United States, February 24–April 21, 2020. 2020;69(18).
Resnik D. Bioethical issues in providing financial incentives to research participants. Medicolegal Bioeth. Published Online June 2015:35. https://doi.org/10.2147/MB.S70416
Sister CY. Spare Some Eggs? Women’s Health. Published April 27, 2023. Accessed July 26, 2024. https://www.womenshealthmag.com/health/a43621157/egg-freezing-donation-programs-national-infertility-awareness-week-2023/
Guide to Freezing Your Eggs for Free (or Extremely Discounted) — Freeze. Accessed July 26. 2024. https://freeze.health/blog/freeze-your-eggs-for-free-or-discounted