Effects of Losartan on Patients Hospitalized for Acute COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Humans
Losartan
/ therapeutic use
Male
Female
Aged
Middle Aged
Hospitalization
COVID-19
/ mortality
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
France
/ epidemiology
Hospital Mortality
SARS-CoV-2
/ drug effects
Canada
/ epidemiology
Aged, 80 and over
Treatment Outcome
Hypotension
/ chemically induced
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
/ therapeutic use
Adult
COVID-19
angiotensin receptor blocker
losartan
mortality
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Sep 2024
26 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
21
02
2024
medline:
26
9
2024
pubmed:
26
9
2024
entrez:
26
9
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) down-regulates angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, potentially increasing angiotensin II. We hypothesized that losartan compared to usual care decreases mortality and is safe in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate the effect of losartan versus usual care on 28-day mortality in patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19. Eligibility criteria included adults admitted for acute COVID-19. Exclusion criteria were hypotension, hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, and use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors within 7 days. Participants were randomized to losartan 25-100 mg/day orally for the hospital duration or 3 months or the control arm (usual care) in 29 hospitals in Canada and France. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, organ support, and serious adverse events (SAEs). The trial was stopped early because of a serious safety concern with losartan. In 341 patients, any SAE and hypotension were significantly higher in the losartan versus usual care groups (any SAE: 39.8% vs 27.2%, respectively, P = .01; hypotension: 30.4% vs 15.3%, respectively, P < .001) in both ward and intensive care patients. The 28-day mortality did not differ between losartan (6.5%) versus usual care (5.9%) (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, .47-2.64]; P = .81), nor did organ dysfunction or secondary outcomes. Caution is needed in deciding which patients to start or continue using ARBs in patients hospitalized with pneumonia to mitigate risk of hypotension, acute kidney injury, and other side effects. ARBs should not be added to care of patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19. NCT04606563.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) down-regulates angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, potentially increasing angiotensin II. We hypothesized that losartan compared to usual care decreases mortality and is safe in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate the effect of losartan versus usual care on 28-day mortality in patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19.
METHODS
METHODS
Eligibility criteria included adults admitted for acute COVID-19. Exclusion criteria were hypotension, hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury, and use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors within 7 days. Participants were randomized to losartan 25-100 mg/day orally for the hospital duration or 3 months or the control arm (usual care) in 29 hospitals in Canada and France. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, organ support, and serious adverse events (SAEs).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The trial was stopped early because of a serious safety concern with losartan. In 341 patients, any SAE and hypotension were significantly higher in the losartan versus usual care groups (any SAE: 39.8% vs 27.2%, respectively, P = .01; hypotension: 30.4% vs 15.3%, respectively, P < .001) in both ward and intensive care patients. The 28-day mortality did not differ between losartan (6.5%) versus usual care (5.9%) (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, .47-2.64]; P = .81), nor did organ dysfunction or secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Caution is needed in deciding which patients to start or continue using ARBs in patients hospitalized with pneumonia to mitigate risk of hypotension, acute kidney injury, and other side effects. ARBs should not be added to care of patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT04606563.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39325643
pii: 7706430
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae306
doi:
Substances chimiques
Losartan
JMS50MPO89
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04606563']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
615-625Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Investigateurs
J Russell
(J)
K Tran
(K)
M Cheng
(M)
P Asfar
(P)
J Demiselle
(J)
J Singer
(J)
P Mann
(P)
F Jain
(F)
K Tran
(K)
K Donohoe
(K)
V Leung
(V)
T Lee
(T)
K Tran
(K)
J Boyd
(J)
K Walley
(K)
K Tran
(K)
D Sweet
(D)
G Haljan
(G)
O Sharif
(O)
D Ovakim
(D)
G Wood
(G)
D Forrest
(D)
A Teale
(A)
S Reynolds
(S)
P Birk
(P)
B Winston
(B)
R Fowler
(R)
N Dameman
(N)
N Adhikari
(N)
J Tsang
(J)
M Cheng
(M)
F Lamontagne
(F)
A Turgeon-Fournier
(A)
None Asfar
None Demiselle
D G Geri
(DG)
J Auchabie
(J)
J P Quenot
(JP)
F Meziani
(F)
V Dubee
(V)
S Lasocki
(S)
Y Cohen
(Y)
E Lebas
(E)
M Goudelin
(M)
J P Mira
(JP)
M Gousseff
(M)
P Leroy
(P)
G Plantefev
(G)
P Rispal
(P)
R Courtois
(R)
B Bievenue
(B)
J M Tadie
(JM)
J P Talarmin
(JP)
S Ansart
(S)
Tae Won Yi
(TW)
Adeera Levin
(A)
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Potential conflicts of interest . J. A. R. reports patents owned by the University of British Columbia that are related to (i) the use of PCSK9 inhibitor(s) in sepsis, (ii) the use of vasopressin in septic shock, and (iii) a patent owned by Ferring for use of selepressin in septic shock; J. A. R. is an inventor on these patents. J. A. R. was a founder, director, and shareholder in Cyon Therapeutics Inc (now closed) and is a shareholder in Molecular You Corp; is the Senior Research Advisor of the British Columbia, Canada Post COVID–Interdisciplinary Clinical Care Network (PC-ICCN); reports receiving consulting fees in the last 3 years as a funded member of the data and safety monitoring board of a National Institutes of Health–sponsored trial of plasma in COVID-19 (PASS-IT-ON; 2020–2021); has received grants for COVID-19 and for pneumonia research from CIHR and the St Paul's Foundation; and was a nonfunded science advisor and member of the government of Canada COVID-19 Therapeutics Task Force (June 2020–2021). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.